Quest Alloys and Metals的动态

The United States Department of Defense has done an impressive job on #criticalmineral #supplychains during this administration, putting some serious ?? on the table to finance projects across the value chain inside the country as well as abroad. See the article below in defense.gov.

US President-elect Donald Trump is well known for making big calls that dominate headlines and his latest calling for the US to buy Greenland – amongst other things – is no different. With less than a week to go before taking office once again, Trump said the US needs Greenland “for national security purposes” and went so far as to refuse ruling out the use of military force to do so. Unsurprisingly, the call was quickly rejected by Prime Minister Múte Egede of the Danish autonomous territory. It isn’t the first time that Trump has called for the US to buy Greenland, having flagged the same thing during his first term, though that too was similarly rebuffed by Egede. While Greenland already plays host to US military installations – including its ballistic missile early-warning system and being able to expand these is likely attractive, the president-elect’s renewed interest might have well been driven by the increasing realisation that relying on China for the supply of rare earths – especially in light of its recent moves to restrict exports – is a BAD THING?. Happily, the giant island – the world’s largest actually – is rich in resources including rare earths and is in the perfect position to supply the US, so having it as part of the US rather than held by a friendly country undoubtedly plays some part in Trump’s call. #CRM https://lnkd.in/gP6pH_Zn

"The U.S. currently maintains just one military base in Greenland, the Pituffik Space Base. While Denmark touted new defense spending for the island just before the new year, it was only enough to cover “two new inspection ships, two new long-range drones, and two extra dog sled teams” – hardly the show of force necessary to scare off Russia or China." " As former Trump National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien wrote on X, “We love the Danes but a couple of additional drones, dogsled teams & inspection ships are not enough to defend Greenland against the Russians & Chinese Communists.” "Greenland also has significant natural resources that have been largely untapped under Danish control. Of particular interest to the United States is the island’s estimated reserves of 1.5 million tons of rare earth minerals, which are necessary for the production of everything from cell phones to solar panels." "China currently controls 60 percent of global production and 85 percent of worldwide processing capacity in rare earth minerals – a virtual monopoly that it could wield as an economic weapon in a trade (or military) war with the United States. Greenland’s rare earth mineral reserves present an opportunity for the United States to break its reliance on China and secure supply chains." "The U.S. Geological Survey also estimates that Greenland and its surrounding waters could contain 17.5 billion barrels of oil and 148 trillion cubic feet of natural gas – about 13 and 30 percent of the world’s undiscovered reserves, respectively." https://lnkd.in/ePH6TEny? utm_objective=website_traffic&dderh=19932a122b51f1c5ad5241aee92e39d0

Why Greenland? Strategic Importance: Greenland's location in the Arctic makes it strategically significant, especially with the new maritime routes, and access to untapped natural resources like minerals, oil, and gas. Military Presence: The U.S. already has a military base in Greenland (Thule Air Base), and expanding this presence could enhance U.S. security interests in the region, particularly as Arctic routes become more navigable. Arguments for the Purchase: Economic Opportunities: Haridopolos might argue that Greenland's natural resources could be beneficial for the U.S. economy, providing new mining and drilling opportunities. Geopolitical Influence: It would increase U.S. influence in an area where other nations, notably Russia and China, are also looking to expand their presence. Sovereignty and Autonomy: Greenland has a significant degree of autonomy from Denmark, and its population might welcome the sale, or a significant deal without the loss of their sovereignty. If Greenland choose to become a state it would rights for autonomy covered in the Constitution. Greenland would involve several layers of decision-making: Greenland's Government: Greenland has its own parliament (Inatsisartut) and government, which handle local affairs under home rule from Denmark. Any significant decision affecting Greenland's status would require the consent of its people and government. Greenland has been moving towards greater autonomy and possibly full independence, which affects any negotiations. Denmark's Government: Denmark holds sovereignty over Greenland. Any proposal to sell or change Greenland's status would need approval from the Danish government, including the Parliament (Folketing). The Prime Minister of Denmark would also play a crucial role in any negotiations or decisions. The United States Government: On the U.S. side, if there were serious talks about purchasing Greenland, it would involve the President, who would initiate negotiations, and would require Congressional approval for such a significant territorial and financial commitment. The U.S. Senate would have to ratify any treaty. Cost and Feasibility: The financial implications, not just in terms of purchase but also in terms of development, infrastructure, and environmental management, would be enormous. Public Opinion: Both in the U.S. and globally, the idea might be seen as anachronistic or imperialistic, potentially damaging diplomatic relations. Conclusion: Addressing this issue would require careful diplomacy, consideration of Greenland's population, and support from Denmark. The decision should heavily prioritize Greenland's aspirations for growth and the preferences expressed by its citizens through voting. https://lnkd.in/enzjxcqr

Greenland Resources Inc. is expanding capex funding sources by engaging potential strategic defense equity investors through Rasmussen Global, founded by Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the former Prime Minister of Denmark and former Secretary General of NATO. The rationale behind this move is the recognition that the top five most powerful defence nations globally designate molybdenum as critical. https://lnkd.in/dzA2-Q_J

Check out the third installment in Caspian Policy Center's Strategic Minerals series. We examined the critical materials for defense tech and explored how Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Ukraine could become pivotal suppliers in safeguarding national security. https://lnkd.in/eZfhQ-mT

The United States Department of Defense emphasizes the importance of securing critical minerals to ensure the resilience of the defense industrial base. These minerals are essential for producing everything from unmanned aerial systems to fighter jets and submarines. Key Points: - Supply Chain Resilience: Addressing disruptions caused by adversarial actions, such as export bans on key materials. - Domestic Production: Increasing domestic mining and processing to reduce reliance on foreign sources. - Allied Partnerships: Collaborating with allies like the UK, Australia, and Canada to secure supply chains. Read the full article by David Vergun at: https://lnkd.in/e-E8Gw8k #NationalSecurity #Defense #Sustainability #USA #USDepartmentofDefence

? With no domestic gallium, germanium, or antimony production, the U.S. faces a significant $3.4 billion economic impact, underscoring its vulnerability to China's mineral dominance. Disruptions to gallium, germanium, and antimony threaten U.S. national security by undermining advanced military technologies, including radar systems, thermal imaging, secure communications, and satellite infrastructure, critical for defense and intelligence operations. This latest escalation highlights the urgency of the U.S. accelerating domestic mining, recycling technologies, and partnerships with allied nations to secure critical minerals. Building supply chain resilience will support our economy and national security. #CriticalMinerals #SupplyChainResilience #Geopolitics #China #RareMetals #NationalSecurity #MineralShortages

Why Donald Trump Wanted to Buy #Greenland? A Strategic Move or a Bold Gamble? US President Donald #Trump once expressed interest in purchasing Greenland, a move that surprised the world. Here's why: Rich Natural Resources Greenland is abundant in rare earth metals essential for #EV batteries and other advanced technologies. Its untapped resources could position the US as a leader in the green energy revolution. Military Strategy Greenland’s location is critical for expanding the US military presence in the Arctic. It would strengthen America’s surveillance capabilities over Europe, Russia, and Canada. The US has made similar moves in the past, like purchasing Alaska from #Russia in 1867 for $7.2 million. This acquisition later proved invaluable due to its oil reserves. #Denmark, which owns Greenland, rejected the idea, calling it absurd. Many viewed the proposal as aggressive, though it underscored Greenland's strategic significance. Was this a visionary move to secure resources and military power, or an impractical idea? #Geopolitics #RareEarthMetals #Greenland #USPolitics #MilitaryStrategy