Public Health Foundation的动态

Thank you to Human Resource Standards Institute - HRSI for the opportunity to join an amazing panel discussion with my colleagues on "The Bottom Line: Talking to Your CFO About Psychological Health and Safety." Join I. David Daniels, PhD, CSD, VPS, Kahlilah Guyah, CHMM, CSP, Mary Ann Baynton and I today at 1 PM ET.?In this session, you will learn to recognize the financial impacts of neglecting psychological health and safety, identify the hazards that pose the most significant risks to your organization, and apply research and global standards to assess your organization's risks. Register here: https://lnkd.in/eXdP7WGw

?? “Effective implementation is critical for turning an awareness of evidence into tangible changes in practices and improved outcomes.” EEF's Jon Eaton, Jonathan Sharples and Jamila Boughelaf introduce the new edition of our guidance report on effective implementation. Read now: eef.li/yQS9Xn

As the PEN Resource Manager Jane’s work focuses on the related tools and resources within the PEN knowledge pathways (KPs). There are two main categories – one for nutritional professionals to learn more detailed information within a topic area to help them be evidence-informed in their practice, and the other providing resources that are provided to clients to support a counselling/education session. Learn more about the related tools and resources in the PEN System: ?? PEN Client Handout Collection: https://bit.ly/4gwZzc4 ?? PEN Practice Guidance Toolkits: https://bit.ly/3ZyC2Bl ?? Using PEN Tools and Resources: https://bit.ly/4eop39q

ACMP Members: Hear Ed Cook, PhD speak about ???????????????? ?????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????? ?????? ????????????????-????????????. Presenter: Edward Cook Ph.D. Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 Time: 12:00 - 1:00 pm EDT (Live) Everything can be perfect in the analysis of a continuous improvement process. The data has been cleaned and prepped meticulously. The analytic tools are perfectly selected. The analysis itself is flawless. And then...the project dies in the conference room because of the executive decision-making process that flat out fails because too little attention is paid to practices that introduce bias into both the decision-making and change processes. ACMP Registration: https://ow.ly/3lVR50Tgu6H

Hear from the experts on management & treatment options for SUI & ED ??

The framework highlights that “central to the framework is facilitating co-ownership of the program evaluation with interest holders to improve collaboration and input on decision-making,” a significant change from the 1999 framework. The value of evidence from program evaluations lies in its use. Thus, program evaluators must engage with policymakers from the beginning to the end to ensure research translation. Program evaluation funders should ensure co-ownership of the evaluation as one of the critical deliverables.

ACMP Members: Hear Ed Cook, PhD speak tomorrow about ???????????????? ?????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????? ?????? ????????????????-????????????. Presenter: Edward Cook Ph.D. Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 Time: 12:00 - 1:00 pm EDT (Live) Everything can be perfect in the analysis of a continuous improvement process. The data has been cleaned and prepped meticulously. The analytic tools are perfectly selected. The analysis itself is flawless. And then...the project dies in the conference room because of the executive decision-making process that flat out fails because too little attention is paid to practices that introduce bias into both the decision-making and change processes. ACMP Registration: https://ow.ly/3lVR50Tgu6H

In FBAs there are several ways to know if we are making an effective decision. First, if your treatment is effective in a socially significant way for your client, your hypothesis was good enough! If not, time to go back to assessment. Second, you can run your data and summary statements by a colleague with more experience and expertise and get feedback. This is a great way to build your clinical decision-making skills. Third, if you are unsure, keep going with stronger assessments. Strong and effective clinical decision-making behavior is one of those skills that you need to work hard to build, and sometimes that means letting the data guide your behavior, step-by-step, day-by-day. It also isn’t something that you just “have” once you pass the exam. It is a skill that continues to evolve and that requires your attention and awareness as you grow in your role as a practitioner. I wish there was a moment when you just arrive, but that is not the case. I work on my decision-making skills every day, and sometimes I make mistakes, and it's up to me to acknowledge them, learn from them, and allow them to shape my future decision-making.

Decision making is more significant than you might think - every living thing has to make decisions - nature's rule is "decide in order to survive". You are as unique in your emotions as you are in your cognitions and it's the tensions between these two that persistently generate undercurrents that influence all your decision making. This is what Risk Type Compass is all about. We work with individuals, boards, major institutions and global organisations, raising awareness of these Risk Type dynamics that drive decision making in individuals and in groups.

The NICE appraisal process is highly complex, outlined in a 200-page manual, with several other important lengthy guides and two dozen TSDs to consider… ?? To make this process more accessible to a wider audience, I’ve put together a detailed walkthrough of the key steps involved in this process, starting with topic selection and ending with implementation of the final NICE guidance within the NHS. ?? NICE - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is certainly known to be one of the most respected HTA bodies across the globe, its methods affecting the evaluation guidelines of many other cost-effectiveness markets. ?? What’s your experience with the NICE process? Let me know what’s going well & what can be improved from your perspective! ?? #HealthTechnologyAssessment #NICEAppraisal #HealthPolicy #EvidenceBasedMedicine #NHS #CostEffectiveness