Chair Harmon noted DoD leveraging the tech sector more, and, more importantly, moving away from the risk averse to a tolerance to experiment and fail culture. We need more entrepreneurial thinking, seeking new approaches with technology to address objectives. For example, target tracking technology is not just for movement patterns, or identifying potentially new targets via association (once confirmed) it can also open new weapons and supply caches, provide new comms intercepting or recruitment moves, and so on.
Vice Chair Edelman's comments on multi-front conflicts and better conflict management brought up to me the fluidity we need to approach conflicts. We are too categorical. In business, you need to think of how one function or feature can apply in a different product or service - and industry. Often, you open up new markets for products and services, helping them show a unique differentiator.
Similarly, we need to be nimble in our thinking on conflict, stepping away from categories. Terrorism and contrived protests can be population unsettling and resource diversion tactics for a later overthrow attempt or low-level conflict. That might offshoot to weapons buying thru a 3rd party financing with its own motives.
Both the Chair and Vice Chair were serious and non-partisan. They offered solutions that are imaginative, workable, and sobering. Both continued to show their dedication to protecting this country.
Today, the National Defense Strategy Commission released their unanimous final report. We at CSBA are honored to have several of our esteemed colleagues play critical roles in this significant effort:
Counselor Ambassador Eric Edelman served as Vice Chair of the Commission.
President Thomas G. Mahnken served as Commissioner.
Board Member GEN Jack Keane (USA, Ret.) served as Commissioner.
Council Member Roger Zakheim served as Commissioner.
Senior Fellow and Director of Defense Budget Studies Travis Sharp served as staffer to the Commission.
The report addresses the "assumptions, strategic objectives, priority missions, major investments in defense capabilities, force posture and structure, operational concepts, and strategic and military risks" tied to the 2022 National Defense Strategy.
?? From Ambassador Eric Edelman, Vice Chair: “Deterring our adversaries from launching a disastrous war requires investment and demonstrating the ability to mobilize at wartime speed, not the pace of bureaucracy.”
Read the report here: https://lnkd.in/ebb4-_9c
Retired
3 个月It's about time!!