Midstone Centre for International Affairs的动态

The foreign office of Pakistan should take extra care to remove all barriers and work for further strengthening of bilateral relations instead of starting any blame-game sabotaging the real essence of acquaintance, confidence, trust and productivity between two brothers in the days to come. Since stakes are very high, so sanity should prevail from both sides. No more public rebuff should be order of the day. The Chinese ambassador Jiang’s stance that Pakistan should severely punish the perpetrators and crack down on all anti-China terrorist groups should also be respected accordingly. It seems that ongoing western power politics and trade war in Asia Pacific and around the globe is now badly hurting Pakistan and its vested interest. The enemies of humanity, regional peace, stability and development are directly attacking the China, Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC) and targeting the Chinese workers and projects in the country leaving bad taste for both the countries which are now facing awkward times. Feelings are now high and temperaments are melting, showcasing increasing pressure of survival, safety, security and systematic approval, execution, implementation and completion of the CPEC projects in the country.

Support Amidst Domestic Challenges: Despite Pakistan's political and economic challenges, China has maintained its support, recognizing Pakistan's strategic importance. This support includes economic assistance and investment in infrastructure projects, which are crucial for stabilizing Pakistan's economy and ensuring the success of CPEC. Diplomatic Backing: China continues to provide diplomatic support to Pakistan on various international platforms, including issues related to Kashmir and regional security. This backing is vital for Pakistan, especially as it navigates complex relationships with India and the U.S. Regional Security Dynamics: The evolving security landscape in South Asia, particularly following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, has increased Pakistan's importance in China's regional strategy. Pakistan is viewed as a stabilizing force in Afghanistan and a counterbalance to India's growing influence.

Pakistan has a sophisticated diplomatic strategy to balance the U.S., China, the Saudis and Iran, which requires fine-grained tweaking and is visible in its relations with Washington. https://lnkd.in/eg2xQqEt

What are the issues surrounding #BRICS? #Pakistan's dream of BRICS: Pakistan has shown interest in joining #BRICS initiatives but remains excluded, largely due to #India's strong opposition, driven by the long-standing dispute over #Kashmir. #India-China Border Dispute: The border conflict over Ladakh between #China and India has led to military tensions and diplomatic strain, complicating relations within BRICS. China-South Africa Tensions: China’s Belt and Road Initiative has rapidly expanded its influence in Africa, creating occasional friction with #South Africa, which seeks to maintain its leadership role on the continent as BRICS’ sole #African member. #Egypt-US ties and Multipolarity: Egypt’s strong military and economic ties with the U.S., including $1.3 billion in military aid annually, could complicate its position in BRICS if the bloc adopts anti-Western stances. BRICS in Latin America : Brazil’s relationship with #Venezuela has been strained due to Venezuela’s political crisis, with #Brazil’s stance fluctuating, while Russia and China within BRICS continue supporting Nicolas Maduro’s government. Ethiopia's Geopolitical Risks for BRICS: #Ethiopia’s location in the geopolitically sensitive Horn of Africa, surrounded by conflict-ridden neighbours, poses potential risks for BRICS involvement in regional disputes. #Ethiopia's Internal Conflicts: Ethiopia’s recent political turmoil, including the #Tigray conflict, could divert BRICS from its economic and developmental goals, pulling the bloc into Ethiopia’s internal crises. UAE’s Western Ties and #BRICS: The #UAE’s close diplomatic and military ties with Western powers, especially the #US., may cause tension within BRICS, which is built on challenging #Western-dominated global governance. Hard Luck of #Iran: Iran's involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts and rivalry with #Israel could pull BRICS into regional disputes. Additionally, its heavy U.S. sanctions may expose BRICS members to secondary sanctions.

I recently penned down a thought-provoking opinion article titled "Analyzing Anti-Taliban Resistance Against Sino-Afghan Increasing Partnership and Chinese Interests." This piece offers a deep dive into how China's growing engagement with Afghanistan is shaping resistance movements against the Taliban. It explores the implications of China's strategic interests in the region and how these developments are influencing local dynamics. If you're interested in understanding the complexities of international relations and regional politics, this article is a must-read. Check it out and share your thoughts!

In a new report, Indian think tank CSDR argues that while India’s approach to Myanmar may not change dramatically, evolving realities necessitate a more nuanced and flexible policy. Suggests that India should expand its 2-track diplomacy to more active engagement with Myanmar resistance forces.

Pakistan's potential alignment with China in response to deteriorating relations with the U.S. carries significant consequences for its strategic autonomy, regional security dynamics, and relationships with other key players like Russia, Iran, and India. While this alignment offers opportunities for economic development through Chinese investments, it also poses risks of increased dependency and potential isolation from Western powers. Navigating these complexities will require careful diplomacy from Islamabad to balance its interests amid an increasingly polarized geopolitical landscape.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar called for honest dialogue at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) to address trust deficits and neighborly relations during the Council of Heads of Government meeting in Islamabad. His comments subtly targeted China and Pakistan, focusing on territorial integrity and terrorism. This visit marked the first engagement of an Indian foreign minister in nearly a decade, where he met with Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chinese Premier Li Qiang. Jaishankar highlighted contemporary challenges, including the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas conflict, while underscoring the SCO Charter's emphasis on mutual trust and regional cooperation. He urged the SCO to candidly confront issues such as terrorism, separatism, and extremism, pointing out that a lack of trust hinders cooperation and regional economic integration. He rejected unilateral agendas, advocating for genuine partnerships grounded in mutual respect for sovereignty. He also proposed collaboration in areas like industrial cooperation, MSME initiatives for employment, and investment flows. Jaishankar stressed that regional connectivity could enhance logistics and energy efficiency, along with the need for cooperation in health, food, and energy security. He advocated for India's contributions to global platforms and called for a reformed UN Security Council to improve representation for developing nations. Prime Minister Sharif emphasized regional peace and connectivity, promoting initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as means for economic integration, while urging a broader perspective on these projects. India's opposition to CPEC was evident when it did not support China's One Belt, One Road initiative in the joint communique. Meanwhile, Chinese Premier Li Qiang stressed the importance of pragmatic cooperation and joint actions against regional security threats such as terrorism. #AsiaRisk #GeopoliticalConflictandDisputes #India Get a full accounting of the security situation in Asia by subscribing to Security Asia. Subscribe now--free of charge--at https://lnkd.in/g7Cs8Gkf https://lnkd.in/dUZiWfBu