Irid Alternate Dispute Resolution Forum (IADR)的动态

8 take-aways from our webinar ”Jurisdiction clauses: how to escape from the jungle of infinite possibilities?”. More than 100 lawyers from all over the world attended the webinar. The key take-aways from this webinar are: ?? reconsider the standard jurisdiction clauses that lawyers use for international agreements, ?? the differences in speed and costs between the various arbitration institutions and state courts may be considerable, ?? check whether the first tier of a multi-tiered dispute resolution clause (for example: mediation) is binding under the laws of the chosen court, ?? the key consideration for choosing a specific forum is the place where the parties’ assets are located, ?? the downside of adopting a non-exclusive or asymmetrical forum clause is that enforcement cannot be sought under the 2005 Hague Choice of Court Convention, ?? the issue of applicable law is a separate issue, but it may be relevant for the choice of court, ???? in the first 5 years of its existence, the Netherlands Commercial Court dealt with a fair number of international commercial disputes from jurisdictions around the globe, ?? the NCC expects a steady rise in cases as more and more international commercial parties?include the NCC jurisdiction clause in their contract. See our website for more information: https://lnkd.in/ePkpcdwe #litigation #internationalarbitration #mediation #lawyer

Wondering what the Arbitration Bill holds in store for the future of dispute resolution? Find out everything you need to know in this article I wrote for the Law Society's Dispute Resolution Section: https://lnkd.in/eMSkcfNP

From a legal perspective, seeking justice involves the pursuit of remedies for violations of rights, whether through judicial (Courts), administrative (Tribunals), or alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (Mediation, Negotiation and Arbitration) . The right to seek justice is closely tied to the principles of accountability, transparency, and the rule of law. It requires that individuals have access to effective remedies of rights violations, and that those responsible for such violations are held accountable. - Clementina E. Ukiri, Esq (aka De Dominus Litis/Master of Suits.)

Recent developments in the practice of mass arbitration are discussed by ML’s Eugene Sokoloff and Eric Posner published in The Legal 500. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/eAxRuT2S

A dive into the world of arbitration whereby we disect the doctrine of arbitrability. The document covers what arbitrability entails, factors that make a matter arbitrable or non arbitrable and significance of the doctrine amongst other issues.

It is my pleasure to bring this article to your attention, which I co-authored with Mr Babajimi Ayorinde, my boss and head of the Dispute Resolution Practice Group, The New Practice (TNP). This article discusses the sanctity of arbitration agreements, drawing from the Supreme Court's remarkable pronouncements in NNPC v Fung Tai. It was initially published in the Tuesday edition (June 11, 2024) of BusinessDay NG. I am sure you will find it worth your while. Bonne lecture! (https://lnkd.in/dNx_3_xm)

Exploring the intricate interplay between the Arbitration Act and the Limitation Act with insights on navigating time limits and ensuring compliance in arbitration proceedings. Read More https://shorturl.at/GqYp8 #K&AInsights

About to seek leave to appeal an underlying Court or tribunal order? Have a read of my latest article in LexisNexis Canada's Law360 Canada's newsletter on the Top 5 Errors Made when Parties Seek Leave to Appeal. #appeals #appellateligation #appellatelawyer

Read Marco P. Falco's latest word on the most common errors when parties seek leave to appeal in the most recent edition of Law360 Canada: https://lnkd.in/gFswR-Es

Navigating Arbitrator’s Ineligibility - The remedial conundrum under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 The article discusses the circumstances in which a person would become ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator according to the Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act. The Authors:?Samit Shukla is a Partner, Saloni Shah is a Principal Associate and Abhishek Kothari is an Associate at DSK Legal. Read the Viewpoint here: https://lnkd.in/g9mRnYNH #Arbitration #TheViewpoint #AppointmentofArbitrator #ArbitrationandConciliationAct1996 #IneligibilityofArbitrators #BarandBench