Interesting proposal here in a SpaceNews op-ed, seeking not to ditch the 450-ton International Space Station in the Pacific after 2030. I agree that it's a terrible waste: I'd have liked to see ISS used as a lab to analyse the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory's potentially biohazardous Mars samples, safely offplanet. Such a shame that can't happen if this deorbiting plan goes ahead.
One suggestion from Rick Tumlinson in Space News is that ISS could be moved to a high Mid Earth Orbit as an orbital heritage centre, preserving one of humanity's "greatest achievements" from the "space bulldozer". NASA says it had actually considered something like that: In its Deorbit Vehicle proposer's day materials, the space agency said (see the slide I've posted in the comments) it did check out the idea of moving ISS to a 40,000km parking orbit just beyond GEO, but found it would need 900,000 kg of extra propellant sent up to make it happen. Depending on the vehicle, that's the capacity of between 150 and 250 ISS cargo freighters (presumably Cygnus at the low end and Dragon at the high end?).
Whatever, here's hoping one of the emerging commercial space firms will make the space station partners - NASA, JAXA, ESA, Roscosmos and the CSA - an offer they can't refuse for the ISS. As Mr Tumlinson says, deorbiting ISS would "be the worst public relations disaster" in NASA's history.
Save Freedom: We must stop the destruction of the International Space Station https://lnkd.in/gJVwwFpU
Sabotaged & Censored ?? ?? ?? ?? . ?? https://www.dhirubhai.net/events/6719677977510125568 . International Space Agency (ISA) Admiral, Rick R. D.