Ever wondered how some startups skyrocket to success while others struggle to stay afloat? The secret might just be in the way they build their teams—meet Richard, the founder who hacked the system to scale his business without breaking the bank. Richard had a big dream: to create a mobile app that would revolutionize the way people connect. But as any entrepreneur knows, turning an idea into reality takes more than just vision; it requires a team. In the early days of his startup, Richard needed a full-fledged crew—a designer, multiple developers, a QA specialist, and a project manager. However, the reality check was harsh. Hiring locally would not only drain his budget but also tie him into long-term commitments that his young company simply couldn’t afford. So, Richard did something smart—he turned to outsourcing. Instead of blowing his budget on local hires, he onboarded a team of ten skilled developers from various corners of the world. These developers weren’t just cost-effective; they brought unique perspectives and expertise that enriched the final product. But what truly made the difference for Richard was the scalability that outsourcing offered. Three months into the project, the bulk of the work was done. The app was built, and the heavy lifting was behind him. Now, Richard didn’t need ten developers anymore. Instead of dealing with the stress of layoffs or paying for unused resources, he smoothly scaled down his team. He kept just the two developers necessary to maintain and update the app, while the rest moved on to other projects. No hard feelings, no financial strain—just a seamless transition. This flexibility is the unsung hero of outsourcing. Whether you need a full battalion of developers to push through a major milestone or just a skeleton crew to keep things running, outsourcing allows you to adapt without the overhead costs and administrative headaches of a traditional in-house team. For Richard, outsourcing wasn’t just a way to save money; it was a strategic move that allowed him to navigate the ebbs and flows of his business with ease. It gave him the freedom to focus on growth, confident that his team could scale up or down as needed. And that’s the real magic of outsourcing—it grows with you, ensuring you have the right resources at the right time, without the long-term commitment or complexity of traditional hiring. #outsourcing #appdevelopment
F5 Hiring/Web Solutions的动态
最相关的动态
-
Point 2 came up in our early years but we have managed to support a lot of VC-backed startups, us being an outsourced tech company never became a problem. There are nuances to everything. As a development partner, I have seen quite a few disastrous MVPs built by other agencies... so I can relate to the sentiment. Do your research before engaging with an agency! Having said that, if you want an MVP built properly, come talk to me ??
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
VCs and Investors want the founders to have an idea of the Software development roadmap for their own Start-up. This essentially gives confidence to the investors that the founders know what they are doing.
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
Non-technical founders should hire fractional CTOs, pay hourly, and only include the possibility of equity if things align. I offer this to startups and it tends to work well, especially early and for the startup, when the need for technical work ebbs and flows with time. For example, I helped a company last year design and launch their platform over a few months. I billed hourly and helped architect and build the system. As they hit different milestones their need for my help diminished - i.e. I haven’t billed more than an hour or two over the last few months. This doesn’t mean the project is over, especially since there are many plans about to start back up, but it does mean they get the cost benefit of paying for technical need that aligns with their business. A company’s technology platform needs to work specifically on the core idea early on, and continually expanding doesn’t make much sense until the business model and PMF is solid. Yes, the modern world is obsessed with ARR, but that’s just not reality and forcing consistent spend with an actual cofounder, on a business that uses technology rather than being a technology business is a mistake. Now, I don’t know if there are others like me out there as I hear this is rare, but it’s absolutely what non-technical founders need to succeed.
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
Founder & CEO at 10xtech | Driving Digital Transformation | Empowering Pharma & E-commerce with Innovative Software Solutions | Tech Leader | Mentor
One client shared in their Clutch review "They had the empathy to understand the needs of a startup and approached our engagement with tremendous maturity." I see this differently. While I understand the concerns raised, the experience with development agencies depends on finding the right partner—one that truly understands the unique challenges startups face. Startups often struggle to bring their vision to life while managing budgets, navigating iterations, and ensuring scalability. The key is partnering with someone who empathizes with this journey and has the expertise to support it. We’ve addressed this by building a cost-optimized team structure: -Experienced Professionals for strategic guidance , Junior Resources for energetic execution -Fractional CTO Support for leadership without the cost of a full-time hire. This blend delivers the perfect mix of expertise and affordability, enabling the flexibility required for iterative development. It’s not just about building MVPs but partnering to bring visions to life. The challenge isn’t avoiding agencies; it’s finding one that deeply aligns with your vision and genuinely cares about your growth.
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
I completely agree with Kanika Aggarwal perspective on partnering with the right development agency. Startups face unique challenges, from limited budgets to the need for scalability and iterative development. It’s crucial to have a partner who not only understands these challenges but also empathizes with the vision and goals of the startup. Her approach of combining strategic expertise with cost-effective execution through a balanced team structure and fractional CTO support is a game-changer. It demonstrates a deep commitment to helping startups thrive without compromising on quality or affordability. Building an MVP is one thing, but aligning with a partner who genuinely cares about long-term growth is what truly sets a business apart. Thank you for sharing this insight—it’s both inspiring and valuable for anyone navigating the startup ecosystem. #StartupSuccess #EmpathyInBusiness #StrategicPartnership #MVPDevelopment #InnovationMatters #NexcognitTechnologies #BuildingVisions #TechForGrowth #AgileLeadership
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
This is so one-sided, Harsh! A more balanced view-point is essential to educate younger or first-time non-tech founders - so that they can avoid pitfalls. --- As a founder of both a software development (services) company and having built tech products - I’ve noticed a recurring theme: non-tech founders often dive into building software armed with imagination but lacking a clear understanding of how the process works. This leads to challenges that could easily be avoided with the right approach. The absence of proper documentation is a frequent issue. Most founders want to start with system development with ideas - not clearly defined and documented requirements - which inevitably leads to frequent changes. Even with documentation the journey doesn’t end there - wireframing and prototyping are essential to visualize the product. For anything involving complex engineering, a proof of concept (POC) is a must to ensure feasibility. There’s also a misconception that agencies are out to scam founders but the truth is agencies have teams to pay and timelines to meet. The issue often stems from founders not having a clear direction, not from agency inefficiency. Many founders end up learning the hard way - spending money, losing funds and then realizing what they truly need, sometimes having to start over from scratch. Finally there’s the cost-quality dilemma. In my experience beginner founders often opt for cheaper solutions skipping critical steps like adequate requirement analysis and system architecture. While it might seem like a way to save money it usually costs more in the long run. Software development thrives on clarity, strategy and collaboration - and it is essential to get these right for the desired results.
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
Web Development Specialist | SEO Enthusiast | Content Writer | Digital Marketing | AI Enthusiast | Email/WhatsApp Campaign | SMO/ SMM/SEM | Branding / Strategy | Linkedin Optimization| Freelance
Building Your MVP: The Right Way to Set Your Startup Up for Success ?? While it’s tempting to hire a dev agency, the best way to bring your MVP to life is by partnering with a technical co-founder who’s invested in your vision. Here’s why: 1?? Speed and Ownership – A co-founder cares about your product and will move quickly to iterate and improve, while a dev agency may have other priorities. 2?? Investors Love Founders Who Build – Having a technical co-founder shows investors you’re in the driver’s seat, not just outsourcing. 3?? Cost-Effective Growth – With a technical co-founder, you save money by iterating quickly and cutting down on expensive development cycles. Startups succeed when founders take ownership of the technical side, making fast decisions and building a strong foundation. If you can find the right co-founder, you’ll be in the best position to thrive. ??
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
The Startup Suicide Manual: How "Tech Co-Founders" Kill More Companies Than Bad Code Let me autopsy some startup deaths: The Co-Founder Fantasy: ? "We'll save money!" (Burns 12 months finding one) ? "They'll have skin in the game!" (Until better offer arrives) ? "VCs love technical founders!" (They love revenue more) The Expensive Reality: Tech Co-Founder Path: ? 6 months searching ? 3 months negotiating equity ? 2 months "planning architecture" ? 1 month before they quit ? $0 in revenue ? 100% dead startup Agency Horror Stories: ? Some are terrible ? Some are expensive ? Some are slow ? All ship something Real Numbers I've Seen: Good Agency: ? MVP in 90 days ? $100K investment ? Working product ? Actual users Bad Tech Co-Founder: ? 12 months drama ? 50% equity gone ? Zero product ? Dead company Why Startups Actually Die: ? Not bad agencies ? Not missing co-founders ? Just founders who: ?- Can't write requirements ?- Don't understand tech ?- Blame everyone else ?- Refuse to learn The Hard Truth: ? Tech co-founders quit ? Agencies get paid to ship ? Markets don't care who built it ? Users want working products What Actually Works: 1. Learn enough tech to manage 2. Write clear requirements 3. Pay for quality 4. Ship something real Remember: Your users don't care about: ? Your co-founder drama ? Your equity split ? Your dev agency hate ? Your technical purity They care about: ? Working products ? Real solutions ? Actual value ? Things that ship #StartupReality #TechTruth #NoBS
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
-
Precisely Harsh Pokharna but the reality is that oftentimes the technical co-founders are either thought to be unnecessary or they get undervalued. Its a false assumption that software development can be easily outsourced! To succeed, one need to have a good IT team internally, even a small team will do....
If there was an award for “where startups waste the most money”, it would 100% go to… outsourcing to software development agencies ?? Non-technical founders think: “I know the customer, I know the problem, but I can’t build the solution” And someone says “Just hire a dev agency, launch a MVP, raise money, and then hire a CTO” Worst advice ever! Never use a dev agency to build your MVP. Here’s why: 1. It takes forever Dev agencies don’t care about your startup like you do. They have other clients, other priorities, and zero skin in the game. Your MVP will take forever. 2. Investors hate it Early-stage investors want founders who can build and iterate quickly. Dev agencies make you slow, and unless you’re growing really fast (which is rare), investors won’t touch you. 3. It drains your cash MVPs rarely work the first time. You’ll need to iterate fast, but dev agencies will charge you for every iteration or bug fix. By the time you realize this, your money is gone, and so is your runway. Dev agencies don’t care if you succeed. Their goal is invoices, not your growth. If you’re serious about building a startup, find a technical co-founder. It’s hard, but it’s worth it. Dev agencies are just a trap for desperate founders. Don’t fall for it. #HarshRealities
