With the Biden administration making headlines for its efforts on judicial reform, D&A was inspired to take a closer look at recent Supreme Court decisions driving this policy and how they impact our work uplifting communities as an equity-first communications agency. We are pleased to share our latest blog post about the implications of the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron doctrine — a pivotal shift that could undermine decades of regulatory protections. From clean air to safe water, the implications are vast, especially for vulnerable communities. For years, Chevron deference ensured that specialized agencies, like our client the California Air Resources Board, had the authority to interpret laws in their areas of expertise. Now, with this protection gone, public welfare is at risk as courts take the reins on decisions that impact us all. Without Chevron deference, the EPA’s ability to enforce air quality standards may be compromised, potentially destabilizing long-standing environmental projections. Vulnerable communities, who already bear the brunt of pollution and climate change, will be disproportionately impacted. As an equity-first communications firm, D&A understands that these shifts not only threaten the environment but also exacerbate existing social inequities. ?? Read our full blog post to learn how this legal shift could shape the future of democracy. ?? https://lnkd.in/gjfZCRXn
D&A Communications的动态
最相关的动态
-
In a controversial move, President-elect Donald Trump has appointed former Congressman Lee Zeldin to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), signaling a shift toward less restrictive environmental rules that, according to Trump, will “unleash the power of American businesses.” Zeldin is expected to roll back Biden-era limits on pollution from power plants and vehicles and reduce clean energy funding from the Inflation Reduction Act. Trump’s quick nomination of Zeldin highlights his commitment to reducing government oversight on industry. The decision has drawn mixed reactions: environmental advocates, like Sierra Club’s Ben Jealous, warn it could threaten public health and put corporate interests ahead of communities, while some Republicans view Zeldin as a moderate who might balance energy production with environmental protections. Zeldin may also curb California’s ability to enforce stricter environmental standards, which have influenced other states. Trump and advisers, including Elon Musk, have also proposed downsizing government agencies and relocating federal jobs from Washington. This is a pivotal moment for U.S. environmental policy, with the future of climate regulations and clean energy funding at stake. #EPANews #ClimateCrisis #NewEarthVoices
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
On June 28, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron v. NRDC, a 1984 case that gave “interpretive leeway” to administrative agencies. The Chevron deference gave experts within federal regulatory agencies the authority to interpret and enforce (often ambiguous) laws passed by Congress. This Supreme Court decision will have massively detrimental and far-reaching impacts on our environment, our communities, and on the lives of everyday Americans. Thankfully, the Biden administration proactively amended the Clean Air Act in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act to give the EPA more authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The added protection with the EPA is great, but this decision still means we need to do everything possible at the state level to ensure environmental policies are enforced effectively in Illinois. To learn more about what the Chevron deference decision means for Illinois, watch this Capital Connection interview with IEC Land Use Programs Director, Eliot Clay: https://lnkd.in/ewFCT3Gc
Capitol Connection: Environmentalists warn of bureaucratic crisis after Chevron ruling
https://www.youtube.com/
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
?? SCOTUS is expected to issue a decision this week around the long-standing precedent called the Chevron deference that has been cited and influenced thousands of other decisions. It determines how courts evaluate a federal agency's interpretation of congressional statutes that guide agency's actions. In 1984, when the Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council ruling around how the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chose to interpret the Clean Air Act was made, Justice Stevens wrote: “When a challenge to an agency construction of a statutory provision, fairly conceptualized, really centers on the wisdom of the agency’s policy, rather than whether it is a reasonable choice within a gap left open by Congress, the challenge must fail. In such a case, federal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate policy choices made by those who do.” If the Chevron deference fails, government agencies will be hesitant to follow science and instead base decisions off the political and legal landscape, and will have REAL consequences on how agencies tackle our current challenges, like climate change, healthcare, and our food landscape -- areas already in peril. What are your thoughts around SCOTUS's potential ruling especially in light of its recent block of the Good Neighbor Plan?
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
This is the time to think about prevention, how do we prepare for what is to come and minimize the impact this new presidency can cause.
President Trump’s first term as president brought set environmental progress back decades. Earthjustice stopped the Trump administration before – in fact, we’ve won an astounding 85% of cases against Trump. With your support, we’ll do it again. As he prepares to take office again, he now has a clearer and more detailed playbook for destructive policymaking. With his Project 2025 agenda, Trump’s re-election opens a barrage of new threats to our climate, environment, democratic principles, and the health and well-being of all Americans. But the Earthjustice team of more than 200 attorneys across the country is gearing up, too. We’re ready to defend the laws to ensure clean air, fresh water, and communities where every child can grow up free from pollution. https://ejus.tc/4hxSyIi
Trump Is More Prepared This Time. We Are Too.
https://earthjustice.org
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
The original Chevron decision allowed the administration at the time to bend rules to favor polluters; the ruling by the court today scraps Chevron to allow industry to skirt environmental regulations and benefit from a do-nothing Congress.?Against the background of shifting, principle-free jurisprudence, the only consistent through-line is that the environment loses in federal courts. It is yet another lesson that we need State and City laws and policies to protect human health and the environment. https://lnkd.in/eJ5gVV8d
Supreme Court curbs federal agency power, overturning Chevron precedent
washingtonpost.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
Help spread the word about this free June 27th webinar on accessing federal funding for local governments with environmental justice concerns in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Hawai’i, Nevada, Arizona, and California! #environmentaljustice #equity #technicalassistance #localgovernment #federalfunding #grants #thrivingcommunities
The Inflation Reduction Act, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and the American Rescue Plan together represent the largest federal commitment in direct investment and tax incentives to energy security, clean energy, and environmental justice to date. This community conversation will introduce the Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Technical Assistance Center (EJ TCTAC) program, the Region 9 TCTACs, and share how this program can benefit municipalities. The program provides free technical assistance to help communities realize their environmental justice goals. First, participants will hear from the Region 9 and National TCTACs, including CCEEJ, the WEST Environmental Justice Center (WEST EJ Center), and ICMA - International City/County Management Association. Then, participants will engage in breakout rooms for group discussion facilitated by the TCTACs. Click here to register: https://lnkd.in/gVrguZ6t
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
As folks are still considering how to navigate a "post-Chevron" regulatory environment, please click the link below for a quick read on how the decision can affect climate change and emerging contaminants, as well as procedural and policy implications. #KLGates #publicpolicy #Texas #Txlege #TCEQ #Chevron #regulations
The US Supreme Court recently released its opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce (collectively Loper Bright), overturning Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. This alert discusses several examples of the wide range of environmental programs and issues the ruling may impact. Read more here: https://ow.ly/AYE650Sv4Qm
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
Could the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the federal agency that sets workplace safety rules be the next target? It's long been a conservative dream: shrinking the federal government. That part of the dream came true when the?Supreme Court tossed the 40-year Chevron precedent?that boosted the power of government regulators on environmental, labor and other laws. And in upcoming days, the justices may decide on another case, pushed by business and conservative groups, and by Republican attorneys general, which argues Congress violated the Constitution more than 50 years ago when it gave OSHA the power to regulate workplace safety and fine companies when they endanger their workers. Read more from Maureen Groppe: https://lnkd.in/eeSewzcH
The?Supreme Court overturned a landmark 1984, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, that has guided how federal agencies?protect the environment, workers, consumers and more, making it easier for regulations to be challenged in court. That ruling said courts should side with a federal agency’s interpretation of a law as long as it’s a reasonable interpretation of what Congress intended. But in one of its biggest decisions of the term, a conservative court found that the 40-year-old precedent in Chevron defied the Administrative Procedures Act by giving agencies priority in interpreting laws ? rather than the courts. Leaders of an alliance of consumer, labor, environmental and other groups said the decision is a gift to corporations and will significantly undermine government experts. Read more on the decision's impacts in Maureen Groppe's story: https://lnkd.in/ejwwiWpW
Supreme Court curbs power of federal regulators, overturning 40-year precedent
usatoday.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
"'You all are wealthy enough,' [Trump] said, 'that you should raise $1 billion to return me to the White House.'?At the dinner, [Trump] vowed to immediately reverse dozens of President Biden’s environmental rules and policies and stop new ones from being enacted." If you think nothing is at stake in this?year's?presidential election, think again. The future of our planet hangs in the balance. Climate change is no longer a distant threat but a pressing reality that requires urgent action. The close ties between specific political figures and the oil industry raise concerns about the willingness to prioritize environmental sustainability and transition to clean energy solutions. As professionals and citizens,?it's?vital to stay informed about these issues and engage meaningfully in the democratic process. Our choices at the ballot box can have far-reaching consequences, shaping policies that impact our present and future generations. Let's?advocate for transparency, accountability, and policies that reflect our shared values and aspirations for a better future. #Election2024 #CampaignFunding #OilIndustry #Democracy #ClimateChange #Transparency #Accountability #Engagement #Leadership Read more here from Josh Dawsey and Maxine Joselow at The Washington Post: https://lnkd.in/g6mbpuG2
What Trump promised oil CEOs as he asked them to steer $1 billion to his campaign
washingtonpost.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
#politics #sustainability #nobelprize President Joe Biden The White House has already given the oil CEOs what they wanted in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA): 1. Tax incentives for carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) which they can use to get to near zero emissions for both extraction of oil and gas and their use in transportation by auto and combined cycle electricity companies for natural gas unless they want to get ideological about polluting. Moreover, zero emissions FutureGen global coal consortium of Barack Obama/Steven Chu U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) was killed by the Congress because of far left climate activism https://lnkd.in/ekJqayjk. 2. Green hydrogen tax incentives reviving George W. Bush energy policies of 2001-2009 toward their transition from oil and gas to green hydrogen beyond 2050. “All of the above” energy strategy of John McCain will take the world through 2100 easily if not farther with clean energy including cleaned up fossil fuels and coal, solar, wind, geothermal, lithium, cobalt, and nickel, rare earths, and fission nuclear energy without global conflict. After 2100 we may be ready for fusion. With Biden they can save far more than $1 billion, expand environmentally safe drilling in the US, and earn the intangible goodwill of the world instead of spending $1 billion with Donald Trump to lose the world. Put your name to it and sign this: #OurCommonFuture https://lnkd.in/eaZe52sD.
???? Professor of business ethics. Passionate about the dark side of the force. I am here to fight the good fight. Sometimes cynical, always hopeful. Ad sidera tollere vultus.
For one billion USD Trump promised the oil CEOs to immediately reverse dozens of President Biden’s environmental rules and policies and stop new ones from being enacted.
What Trump promised oil CEOs as he asked them to steer $1 billion to his campaign
washingtonpost.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录