No -- he doesn't. I reject this entire notion that a city manager must profess absolute devotion and loyalty to a city that can fire you on a whim. The City of Kansas City, MO needs to convince Brian Platt to stay long term. I don't know Platt, nor do I have any inside information. What I do know is that the City of Austin is going to be considered a top 5 destination for many city managers, if not the top destination. If you had an opportunity to play or coach for the Yankees... If you were being recruited by Google or Apple... ...of course you are going to consider it! There is no shame in testing the waters to see if the Austin opportunity might have been a realistic possibility. This is a resume capstone, if ever there was one. And frankly, there is no shame even if he was simply leveraging Austin to extract a stronger contract and better compensation in KC. This op-ed writer is seriously confused about the current market dynamics for city managers across the nation. It is thin. There is more demand for talented managers than there is supply -- for a variety of reasons. What Kansas City and any other elected official reading this post who value their current city manager should be thinking is: "What do we need to do to make sure our city manager is happy and content with their pay, benefits, and work environment?" ---- The City Manager RTRs & Job Board is my FREE newsletter that I publish on LinkedIn. You can subscribe to it here: https://lnkd.in/edEk6FxH Each week, I publish a list of city and county managers, and ACM/DCMs who resigned, were terminated, or retired along with job postings. https://lnkd.in/efYziYhG
I've never bought into the 'Employee as Slave' model that many industries rely on to keep their talent both motivated and committed to the organization. One of my favorite messages to staff has been ' I don't own you, but I do own the time that you work with me.' However, if that time sucks, because the employer delivers poor opportunities for growth, a negative work culture and is constantly trying to grind one's market value into negative territory - there should be no surprise. The grass will be greener elsewhere and that municipality will find itself in the expensive position of recruiting for a place that has a reputation for treating people the wrong way.
It looks to me a perceived problem only came about when they found out he might be leaving and are now offended. I hope he’s still looking because, chances are, he’ll be on his way out soon of no real fault of his own.
That same truth applies to any job out there. Want good people to stay? Treat them well, pay that what they are worth, and give them room to do their job. And don't take it personally if an employee moves on to a new job that is the right move for them.
A thoughtful perspective on the dynamic nature of city manager positions. It's essential to prioritize what keeps talented managers engaged and satisfied.
Isn't everyone looking (even casually) for a better offer? Isn't that one of the goals of having a career in something - to use your experience and skills to better yourself?
Don’t know him or
I concur, 100%
Spot on, Joe!
Improvement Guru. I help organizations become better & make the world better. Lifelong Learner. Always learning about my expertise, my community, my professional partners, & our world. Let’s make our world better.
8 个月I’m not a fan of market dynamics running how you treat people. Treat them right, no matter the market. And remember no city makes the market; the only thing close is just paying a lot for quality and stability. Interestingly, Brian fired someone for not meeting the residency requirement, a big no-go for Joe. Absolutely right that Brian can and should see what else is available. I wonder about people who do not. And the closing question is spot-on.