Breker Verification Systems的动态

What’s needed to be able to trust that a RISC-V implementation will work as expected across multiple designs using standard OSes? Semiconductor Engineering's Brian Bailey discussed the issue with John Min, vice president of customer service at?Arteris; Zdeněk?P?ikryl, CTO of Codasip; Neil Hand, director of marketing at?Siemens EDA?(at the time of this discussion); Frank Schirrmeister, executive director for strategic programs and systems solutions at?Synopsys; Ashish?Darbari, CEO of?Axiomise; and Dave Kelf, CEO of Breker Verification.

https://bit.ly/3WBkWRq Longtime, seen as a handcraft for its sensitive part, data analytic approach is emerging for ASIC design

Using SerDes Toolbox, Qualitas Semiconductor streamlines the development of an IBIS-AMI model.

Join us for the Webinar Series: The CMSIS Solution ?? https://lnkd.in/gysJER96 On Tuesday, 29. October, Kyle Dando from NXP Semiconductors shows you how to get started in the VS Code MCUXpresso environment. And I provide an overview of the work that has been done by Arm, NXP, and ST. With the Open-CMSIS-Pack project we address todays developer requirements. Guest speakers from TARA Systems, Embedded Systems Academy, Memfault explain how #CMSIS simplifies software integration. And the topic in session 7 is #AI and #ML Model integration into embedded projects exemplified by using Edge Impulse or TDK SensEI. #Cortex #microcontroller #DevOps #CI #IAR #GCC #LLVM

Why Verification Became the Chip Design Bottleneck Kay Li explains why design verification has become a bottleneck in the production of new chips, and how workflows used in software development can be applied to logic design to improve the situation. Extended Clip: https://lnkd.in/eeh5kHwn Full Episode: https://lnkd.in/e648G7Mj #chipdesign #verification #customsilicon

Chiplets are quickly becoming an integral part of the high-performance compute world, thanks to their versatility and scalability, but utilizing them comes with some unique challenges involving signal integrity, power integrity, and integration.

With the SerDes Toolbox, Qualitas Semiconductor slashed development time for the IBIS-AMI model by 30-40%, streamlining the entire process. #SignalProcessing #ModelBasedDesign

???????? & ???????? ?????????????? ???????????? – ?????????? ????????????????: How can you assign integer literals (such as 24, 100, etc) to a std_logic_vector type signal in ????????? ????????????: Assigning integer literals directly to std_logic_vector or unsigned type signals is not allowed and you will get this error from Vivado: [????????? 8-2774] ???????? ??????_??????????_???????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ?????????????? ?????????????? [????????? 8-2774] ???????? ???????????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ?????????????? ?????????????? You need conversion function defined in IEEE ??????????????_?????? package. You can assign an integer literal to a ??????_??????????_???????????? with “????_????????????????” function and “??????_??????????_????????????” type conversion. ???????????? ??????_???: ??????_??????????_???????????? (7 ???????????? 0); ??????_?? <= ??????_??????????_????????????(????_????????????????(255, ??????_??'???????????)); -- ??????_?? ???????? ???????????????? ???? 255 But what if you try to assign an integer literal which is more than 8-bits? Then, Vivado trims the upper bits and assign only the lower 8-bits. ???????????? ??????_???: ??????_??????????_???????????? (7 ???????????? 0); ??????_?? <= ??????_??????????_????????????(????_????????????????(511, ??????_??'???????????)); -- ??????_?? ???????? ???????????????? ???? 255 What is your method to assign integer literals to ??????_??????????_???????????? types? Please share your thoughts in comment section. "?????????????? ?????????????????? ???? ?????? ???????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ????????????" #VHDL?#FPGA?#SoC?#Verilog?#ASIC #VLSI #Embedded

Introducing global assertion control in runtime to #Verilator. Find out how it can simplify your verification test suites and read about future considerations for more granular control: https://lnkd.in/dC2WY_Sb CHIPS Alliance #ASIC #FPGA

?? Dynamic Arrays in SystemVerilog: How Copy Operations Work! ?? Dynamic arrays in SystemVerilog provide a lot of flexibility when handling variable-sized data, but how we perform copy operations matters! Here’s a breakdown of two common scenarios: 1?? Case 1: dyn1 = dyn2; When we assign one dynamic array (dyn2) to another (dyn1), all elements of dyn2 are copied into dyn1. However, any previous elements in dyn1 are not preserved—the array size of dyn1 is adjusted to match dyn2. Think of it as a complete replacement rather than merging. 2?? Case 2: dyn1 = new[4]; dyn2; In this case, we allocate a new dynamic array (dyn1) with a size of 4 and copy the elements of dyn2 into it. Here’s the cool part: the existing elements in dyn2 are preserved, and the extra locations in dyn1 are initialized to default values (e.g., zeros for integers). This ensures you can expand dyn1 while retaining data from dyn2. ?? Key Takeaways: Case 1: Overwrites the contents of dyn1 entirely. Case 2: Preserves and extends dyn2 into dyn1, adding additional locations for flexibility. Dynamic arrays are a game-changer in runtime scenarios, but understanding these nuances ensures efficient memory management and accurate data handling. ?? How do you handle dynamic arrays in your projects? Have you ever encountered unexpected behavior with these operations? Share your experience! ?? For more detailed insights on this topic, check out my YouTube channel: All About VLSI! https://lnkd.in/gMzbNCBa #SystemVerilog #DynamicArrays #VLSI #HardwareDesign #VerificationInsights #LearnVLSI #AllAboutVLSI