Berkshire Risk Services的动态

A very complex web to detangle when going through bankruptcy with companies of this size.

"Ensure a Smooth Used Car Purchase—Avoid Disputes with a Legal Agreement from BLF - business-legal-filing.com." Avoid Unnecessary Disputes and Litigation. Be Prudent. Use a Car Purchase Agreement from BLF - business-legal-filing.com." This statement emphasizes the importance of prudence when purchasing a used car and recommends using a formal Car Purchase Agreement to avoid disputes and legal issues. BLF provides professional services to ensure that the agreement is legally compliant, safeguarding both buyers and sellers https://lnkd.in/gFikF7qi #UsedCarPurchase #LegalProtection #BLF #SafeTransactions"

Fake Reviews = Real Risks! ?? With the FTC tightening the reins on reviews and endorsements... Your dealership could be in the crosshairs. ?? Don’t wait until it’s too late! Join us TOMORROW for a crucial webinar where KPA's own Adam Crowell Esq., VP of Legal & Corporate Development will guide you through the new rule and how to safeguard your business. ?? When: August 22nd at 11 am PT / 2 pm ET Make sure your dealership is ready—register today! ?? https://hubs.ly/Q02L-STx0 #DealershipRisk #FTCRules #AutoIndustryCompliance #ProtectYourDealership #ComplianceMatters #FTCCompliance

Following a ruling by the UK Court of Appeal that a conflict of interest could arise between purchasers of used trucks and purchasers of new trucks in opt-in collective proceedings brought by the Road Haulage Association (RHA) against truck manufacturers involved in a 14 year price-fixing cartel, RHA has established a separate company, RHA Used Trucks Limited, to represent the second-hand truck claimants. The company will have its own legal team and funding will be provided by Therium Litigation Atlas, a distinct entity from Therium Litigation Finance and Therium RHA, which is providing funding to the new truck purchasers. The UK CAT has accepted the measures put in place. Read more: https://lnkd.in/gS9k3fXm #LitigationFunding #Disputes #litigationfinance #disputeresolution #thirdpartyfunding #litigation

?? Understanding Strict Products Liability: When Does It Apply? In legal disputes involving products and services, it's crucial to distinguish liability. Courts apply strict products liability to manufacturers, retailers, and distributors, among others in the chain of distribution. However, there are gray areas, especially when services are the primary focus. In Ferrari v. Grand Canyon Dories, a plaintiff was injured by a raft's metal frame on a commercial rafting trip. The court ruled that Grand Canyon Dories, primarily providing a service—river transportation—wasn't subject to strict liability for the raft product. This decision clarifies how courts determine liability based on a defendant's role with the product. #ProductLiability #LegalInsights #PooleShaffery

Supreme Court Affirms HPCL’s Termination of Dealership Agreement for Breach of Terms by Dealer. Click the link to read more: https://lnkd.in/gAkiqJVF Visit us : https://primelegal.in/ LawRato.com PathLegal Vidhikarya Legal Services LLP Prime Legal LegalKart Adv Anik Ayantika Mondal #law #lawfirm #lawyers #legal #legalnews #legalmarketing #SC #HC #attorney #lawstudents #Courts #judgment #advocate #lawinterns

???????? ?????? ?????? ?????????????? ???? ?????????????? ???? ?? ?????????????? 37 ????????????, ???? ?????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???? ??????????? Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (“BPCL”) v. Anant Kumar Singh (Patna High Court, Division Bench, 8.01.2024), was a section 37 Appeal against an Order passed by single judge in a section 34 Petition of #Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) upholding an award. In this case, BPCL had issued an advertisement for appointment of a petrol pump dealer for certail outlets in Jharkhand, & the applicant had to file certain affidavits regarding the proposed site for the outlet. Subsequently licence was issued in favour of the Respondent by BPCL. Thereafter certain complaints were filed by the other applicants alleging that the affidavit filed by the Respondent contained false statements regarding ownership & leasing of the proposed site. BPCL issued show cause notice to the Respondent & subsequently terminated the Respondent, upon which writ petition was filed. Thereafter matter was referred to arbitration. The arbitrator held that the infirmities in the affidavit were non-serious in nature, made inadvertently, & that the dealership should be restored to the Respondent. The #arbitrator also held incase the dealership was not restored within 3 months, a particular amount of monthly damages was to be paid to the Respondent. This award was challenged in section 34 where the court upheld the award, & finally the present appeal was made. The Court observed as below: 1.????The fact was that the petrol pump was being operated by the Respondent on the same proposed site with his workforce, & the land owners whose affidavit was submitted for the application had also supported the case of the Respondent in arbitration proceedings. 2.????The Arbitrator had rendered a well-reasoned & plausible view keeping in view the above facts, & also that the termination of dealership was not carried out as per any terms & conditions of the agreement but on account of a complaint received by BPCL. 3.????Post the 2015 amendment in the A&C Act, mere contravention of substantive law in India, by itself, is no longer a ground available to set aside an arbitral award. In order to interfere with the award, any illegality alleged needs to be patent illegality appearing on the face of the award going to the very root of the matter. (Section 34(2-A), A&C Act, Ssangyong Engineering v. NHAI (2019) 15 SCC 311) 4.????Contravention of a statute not linked to public policy/public interest, cannot be brought in by the backdoor when it comes to setting aside an award on the ground of patent illegality. 5.???The scope to interfere with an award under Section 37 is even more restricted than a Court scrutinising the award under Section 34, particularly so, when the learned court below has upheld the award. Hence appeal was dismissed & award upheld. #legalissues #lawyer #legalupdates Adwitya Legal LLP

In our towing litigation practice, we've seen a troubling pattern: towing companies making it extremely difficult for consumers to recover their vehicles. They inflate bills, manufacture storage fees, and create artificial obstacles. When clients can't pay, they rush to sell the vehicles, profiting massively. A recent case highlighted this scam when our client arrived just 9 minutes late to a fake auction and was denied the chance to reclaim his vehicle.? These companies exploit lien statutes to claim the full value of the vehicle, turning towing into an underground dealership operation. If your car has been towed and is in danger of being sold, act fast. Contact us immediately! We're experts in towing and lien litigation, ready to fight for your rights. ???? ???? DM us or comment "LEGAL" below for help. Let’s put an end to this scam together! ?? (305) 570-2208 ?? [email protected] ?? www.lawayala.com #lawyers #legalmarketing #lawfirms #law #business

#Contractlaw question for you: A supplier agreed to indemnify a purchaser for?“cost arising from claims of personal injury . . . caused . . . by defective parts." The supplier supplied defective parts, which caused third parties to make personal-injury claims against the purchaser. Must the supplier indemnify the purchaser for the cost of defending against those claims? The Sixth Circuit said no. Benjamin Morrell and I have explained why.?What do you think? #legalwriting #contractdrafting

Last month’s Sixth Circuit ruling related to an auto part supply contract provides useful guidance to companies drafting indemnity provisions and reminds them about the importance of clear contract drafting. Learn more in this bulletin from Detroit partner Michael Pomeranz and Chicago associate Ben Morrell: