Benjamin K.的动态

Minnesota Law Prof. Jack Whiteley published “The Three-Verdict Problem," (forthcoming in Legal Theory) on SSRN. Whitely applies modern ideas about standards of proof to the intellectual history of "not proven" yielding eight plausible meanings for the verdict. z.umn.edu/9zr1

In the first essay of our 'Law and Emotion' series, Renata Grossi presents an ambitious reading of western legal theory, calling upon us to look closely beneath the surface of traditional jurisprudence to find resonances of emotion. https://lnkd.in/gkWBpdzm

New Article in LAWIRE!

Happy to have the final gloss in this matchup with "faint-hearted" originalist Justice Scalia: SEMICOLON SNAFUS South Texas Law Review Winter 2023 63 S. Tex. L. Rev. 209 "Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner point out, correctly, that punctuation will rarely alter the meaning of a word, 'but it will often determine whether a modifying phrase or clause applies to all that preceded it or only to a part.'?Professor Harold Lloyd?frames the issue as follows: 'As a matter of interpretation or construction as the case may be, to what degree (if any) does this text's punctuation (or lack thereof) help signify the author's or speaker's meaning? In light of our answer, how should we interpret and construe such meaning?' Noting my willingness to explore all relevant evidence here, the article also quotes my belief that "courts should not swing from giving improper weight to punctuation to giving no weight at all" (and vice versa I might add). Many thanks to the Wake Forest Law Review for publishing this. I have to quote Wake Forest University School of Law's own Isaac Hopkin, "Statutory interpretation is such a joy."

#LegaAfricaMagazine ?? ????????????????????: ?????? ????????????, ???????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????? There’s a moment every lawyer knows, a silence hanging between the door and the courtroom, when the heart tightens, and the mind sharpens. Before court, it’s a world of preparation, strategies, and the weight of justice itself. In that moment, every case becomes a mirror, reflecting something deeper. You’re not just a lawyer; you’re a guardian of truths, standing at the intersection of right and wrong, entrusted with the lives, hopes, and futures of others. But after the court session, the suit feels heavier, and the silence is even louder. There’s no applause, no cheering crowd—just the bittersweet weight of knowing that every battle is a step into the unknown. Sometimes, it’s victory that feels hollow because it comes at a cost. Other times, it’s defeat that carves an ache so deep it follows you home, lingering in every quiet room and echoing in every sleepless hour. Through it all, a lawyer learns the deepest truths: humility in victory, strength in defeat, and grace in the face of every outcome. What can be learned is that justice isn’t always clean; it’s a messy, heartbreaking quest that calls on every ounce of one’s soul. And perhaps, that’s the real honor of it—the courage to stand in that space, day after day, with resilience, knowing each case, win or lose, shapes a legacy written not in the judgments of court, but in the unseen hearts touched along the way. Author : Anonymous #Legallense #Writeup #experience #Lawyers #attorney #Reflection #lawstudent

Just finished the course “Understanding Intellectual Property” by Dana Robinson! Check it out: https://lnkd.in/ez84y7Wk #intellectualproperty.

My next three pieces in the International Jurist are focused on how U.S. law schools are shedding the "empty seats in J.D. classes" image when it comes to LL.M. programs. [My two cents: it was never true or as simple as it sounded to strategists, and my career shows that it costs money to build and grow LL.M. programs!]. U.S. law school colleagues: do you have something in your LL.M. program that is a real gamechanger that you'd be comfortable highlighting in a piece? If so, please reach out! Current LL.M. students: is there something about your LL.M. program that you absolutely love and shows the resources your school is spending on LL.M. students? Reach out and I'll see if I can fit it into one of the pieces. The National Jurist

If you have attended St. Thomas Law, you have most likely been fortunate enough to meet Professor Jerry Organ. In our latest blog post, Senior Editor Trysten Cisney sat down with Professor Organ to discuss the many ways he has contributed to St. Thomas’s success. ???? Read the post now at ustlawjournal.blog

"Procedural Justice and Relational Theory," edited by Dennis Morrison, Fiona McKenzie, and Theresa Macdermot, is a groundbreaking exploration of justice that transcends traditional legal frameworks. This 2021 volume delves into how procedural fairness and interpersonal relationships intersect to shape equitable outcomes. By integrating theoretical insights with practical applications, the editors provide a compelling narrative on the importance of empathy, respect, and relational dynamics in legal processes. This book is essential for anyone interested in understanding justice not merely as a procedural concept but as a relational one, fostering a more humane and effective legal system. (S No. 1).

From the moment humanity began, the principle of fairness has echoed through time-Adam, after all, was given the chance to explain himself. This fundamental law of nature, the right to be heard, is deeply woven into our legal systems today. But imagine a scenario where, despite this right, the law restricts a defendant from mounting a full defence. As a law student, my curiosity was piqued: How does this align with our justice system's commitment to fairness? In this article, I explore the fascinating mechanics of the summary suit—a unique procedural shortcut that limits the defendant's right to contest. Join me as I unpack how our laws reconcile this exception to one of the most fundamental principles of natural justice.