Speaking out during a war is hard. Perhaps it’s better to listen ??
When CEOs put out statements about a pressing challenge facing the world, their stakeholders listen, carefully. So what should business leaders say, or do, now that the Hamas terror attacks are leading to a full-blown war?
One common starting point is to condemn terrorism and antisemitism. Jewish American business leaders I spoke to strongly oppose staying silent. “You have to have one message: I stand for humanity,” Richard Edelman of the namesake PR firm told me. “This was a terrorist act, and it’s not consistent with humanity.”
As the conflict that began with an atrocious attack on innocent civilians has escalated, hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians are on the run as the Israeli military moves to crush Hamas. Jews around the world have experienced a surge in antisemitism, and Muslims are being targeted, too.
Should business leaders’ responses evolve as the conflict grows?
“Business leaders should have spoken out immediately, and some of them did,” Bill George, former CEO of Medtronic, told me. “Now, they need to focus on the needs of their employees, wherever they are.”
But for some non-American business leaders I spoke to, the best response is not to make any public statement. “I would advise leaders not to put [out] any positional statements because they are most surely going to offend someone, and at the very least ring empty and untrue for those who are truly suffering,” a communications executive at a U.S.-based international organization told me.
Originally from the Middle East, she preferred not to disclose her identity. It was a common theme as I spoke to people who did not support the mainstream American corporate approach, for fear of reprisal.
A South Asian-American ESG director at an American company I spoke to made the connection to the ongoing controversy over the Israel-Hamas war on U.S. college campuses. “CEOs should not try to limit free speech…That has been a horrible mistake similar to McCarthyism.”
One thing everyone I spoke with agreed on was the need to stay out of politics. “Business is not going to solve the Middle East conflict,” Edelman said. “It needs to frame the situation in human terms, and human suffering.”
Still, it seems impossible to meet every stakeholder’s expectations. Many younger and international employees reached out to me criticizing their companies’ responses for including what one described as “unintentional political comments.” “Because our leadership is so U.S.-centric, even our seemingly neutral responses are political,” a Europe-based DEI director at an American multinational said.
So perhaps the best approach is to shift gears. “I would rather listen than talk,” the communications executive said. That is “super powerful.”
https://lnkd.in/eNKhAmd6
Leadership communications trainer | Crisis prevention expert for executives, boards, and investors | Speaker, writer, always thinking one step ahead.
I’ve been posting about this topic since the conflict began. There are very few CEOs who can get away with making a statement. At least 98% of the time, there has been serious backlash (Web Summit, etc). Even trying to walk a fine line of neutrality has backfired (Condé Nast). It is my belief that CEOs are better off saying nothing at this time, regardless of what they may think or where they stand. It’s just too volatile in this business and cultural environment to say something without consequences.