Just ahead of the weekend, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission published its enforcement results for Fiscal Year 2024, which ended on September 30, 2024. Many of us expected a record number, and the stats lived up to the expectation. The SEC filed 583 total enforcement actions in the 2024 fiscal year while obtaining orders for $8.2 billion in financial remedies, the highest amount in SEC history. The amount in FYE 2023 was $4.95 billion, which at the time was the second highest total in SEC history. Interestingly, the headline announcing the results states the SEC “saw market participants respond to its efforts to promote [a] culture of proactive compliance.” The SEC also highlights focus areas of its enforcement efforts, including off-channel communications, marketing rule violations, whistleblower protection cases, and disclosure of holdings and transactions by insiders and investment managers. See the statistics in the below comments.
Steven Yadegari的动态
最相关的动态
-
Your firm is at risk for getting fined from the SEC and FINRA regulations. Register (https://spr.ly/6042beiV8) and join us in our exclusive webinar with our compliance experts as we provide a refresh and updates on these regulations, while learning what firms must understand and do to stay compliant and avoid fines.
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
?? Wondering what FINRA is and how it impacts your business? Discover everything you need to know about the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in our new blog post#FINRA #FinancialIndustry #ComplianceExplained https://ow.ly/KMon50SXukp
What is the FINRA?
https://gatlabs.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
?? Wondering what FINRA is and how it impacts your business? Discover everything you need to know about the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in our new blog post#FINRA #FinancialIndustry #ComplianceExplained https://ow.ly/rcsc50SvuLt
What is the FINRA?
https://gatlabs.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
?? Wondering what FINRA is and how it impacts your business? Discover everything you need to know about the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in our new blog post#FINRA #FinancialIndustry #ComplianceExplained https://ow.ly/rcsc50SvuLt
What is the FINRA?
https://gatlabs.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
In August, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission fined 26 financial firms for failing to track employee "off-channel communications." That's $393 million of fines in the latest #WhatsApp sweep The Wall Street Journal https://lnkd.in/dTeqckdd #WhatsAppForProfessionals #Compliance #ClientWindow #Audit #WallStreetJournal #WallStreet
Opinion | The Surveillance and Exchange Commission
wsj.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
Ranah Esmaili, Lara Shalov Mehraban and I share our thoughts on how the upcoming election may affect securities regulation and enforcement. Come check it out.
SEC Post-Election Outlook Democrat or Republican? What This Means for Securities Industry Regulation and Enforcement
sidley.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
Expect to see the Securities and Exchange Commission shift its approach toward penalties and Wells meetings—which occur before the SEC launches an enforcement action—the regional director of the agency’s New York City office said during this year’s Securities Enforcement Forum. Expressing only her personal views, Antonia M. Apps predicted Tuesday that new agency leadership would be more thoughtful in deciding when to ban individuals from participating in the securities industry. “To what extent the imposition of that remedy is necessary to the public interest, you are likely to see movement on those types of penalties,” she said. Apps further suggested attorneys revisit a guidance issued in 2006, when the commission included Paul Atkins, President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the agency. “Get more familiar with it. It turns on whether the issue of the violation has provided an improper benefit to shareholders … or has conversely resulted in harm,” Apps said. “The guidance is that we should not be punishing innocent shareholders twice.” Her forecast came in response to questioning from George Canellos, who co-directed the agency’s Enforcement Division from May 2013 to January 2014. The Q&A was one of two keynote events at the Securities Enforcement Forum, which came to NYC for the first time this year. Full story from Alyssa Abigail Aquino: https://lnkd.in/gMZ5EdKy
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
-
?? Navigating the complexities of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 13f-2 compliance? This article from Anderson P.C. provides an insightful breakdown of the challenges institutional investment managers will face before the January 2025 deadline. The new reporting obligations for short positions are transforming data management, especially regarding security identifiers like the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI). ? ?? LEI plays a critical role in ensuring accuracy and transparency in filings like Form SHO, which is essential for firms to meet the SEC’s rigorous reporting standards. With increasing regulatory scrutiny, having robust systems in place is not optional—it's crucial. ?? ? Dive into this must-read article to understand the implications and how to prepare: https://lnkd.in/e-mrkn5Y ? #SECCompliance #Rule13f2 #LEI #DataManagement #ShortSelling #RegulatoryCompliance #InvestmentManagement
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
-
"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Doesn't Care if You Get Our Emails" Today I Learned ("TIL") that the SEC literally does not give a shit if our clients ACTUALLY get our emails -- all they care about is whether we have have a log of a copy of an email we MIGHT have (or not) sent ?? As part of a routine examine one of their internal lawyers is trying to say we are "deficient" for not having a copy of an email from our funding portal even though Google GMAIL rejected it for a rando reason -- even though Google GMAIL accepted other emails from us to this particular investor! When we explained that we consider email to be an unreliable communication channel and that our Funding Portal is the "Authoritative System of Record" for the transaction data AND the fact that FINRA has agreed with us for the past six (6) years, they didn't seem to care. So I pointed out that what they were telling me is that all they cared about is that we need to have the APPEARANCE of having sent an email without any kind of evidence that we did, that it was received, read, or comprehended!? I did get to share with this one staff attorney that she was in the minority, and that dozens of practicing attorneys, many of whom actually worked on the legislation disagreed with her analysis. Lastly I pointed out that the law as written says "not limited to" -- and that does not in any way mean "only email is valid" ?? From here I start working with Trading and Markets to request "no action" letters and try and engage the Office of the Small Business Advocate. Is this the best government we can afford?
要查看或添加评论,请登录
-
-
What is the unexpected you should watch out for? This is a good article to read because it illustrate why the SEC has such broad power to go after assets. Most financial advisors are good actors but you can also see here how one bad actor can create a web that harms a whole segment of advisors. https://lnkd.in/gb5eCmQC
SEC Writes Off $10 Billion in Fines It Can’t Collect
wsj.com
要查看或添加评论,请登录
Founder and CEO @ FiSolve | Record of Success, Financial Services Industry
3 个月https://www.sec.gov/files/fy24-enforcement-statistics.pdf