Dan Schultz的动态

查看Dan Schultz的档案,图片

Agribusiness Psychotherapist | Keeper of the Language | Closing The Category Gap In Agriculture

Most go-to-market strategy advice #agtech startups receive is terrible. Because it’s largely based on a logical fallacy. Most companies believe that when people see the widget we’ve built, they’ll immediately understand how cool it is technically and how valuable it is financially. But most people don’t. They don’t get why you've built this thing. They don’t get why they should care. And they really don’t know why they need to give you money for it...until you give them a new framework with which to see their problem. Most of the go-to-market brain trust will push you down the road to competitive analysis, market research, and other tactics designed for mature markets. - But what did the market research say about tractors in 1870? - Or what was the competitive analysis on Roundup Ready soybeans in the late 80’s? - What was the market saying about auto-steer in the 90’s? The problem with traditional go-to-market approaches is they uncounciously assume you are: - Competing for market share. - In an existing category. - With a “better” or incrementally improved product. They can't help you build a concept that no one’s ever heard of before. They can’t work with you when the customer doesn't have a line item for your product or service. They can't help you redefine the problem in the customer’s mind. And research tells us that in technology categories, the category king normally takes about 76% of the market capitalization. Because no one remembers the also-ran, they only remember the first. So if your go-to-market is not built to design a new category of your own, then you’ll be letting someone else define the problem, prescribe the solution and set the value for the outcome you deliver. A bad plan for success. Instead, you need to build your go-to-market to have the conversation with your customer on the terms you establish You need to move the thinking in the industry from where it is today to where you want it to be. This should impact the way you price your product, the way you promote your company, and the methods you use to place your solution in front of the target customer. - Stop robbing your future valuation in the name of scaling the distribution of users. Upselling later is harder than it looks today. - Stop softening your market differentiation by selling through an existing distribution network. The channel usually won’t save you unless their is market pull for your product downstream. - Stop hiring sales people and expecting that they’ll be ready to “just sell.” Early sales depend on organizational learning and renaissance team members who are willing to take the time to educate the customer. Remember, there is nothing more important to the future value of your company than the way you build your #gtm today. Start investing in your story as if it matters. Start designing your category. Make something different. Make people care. Make fans, not followers. #agribusiness #gotomarketstrategy

James Foy

Business Development @ Stellar Cyber

1 年

Unless a possible customer can tell you what the buying process is like and why they will buy; you do not have a product.

Kim M.

Experience Leader: Products, Services, Strategies | Resilience specialist

1 年

I'm a proponent of human-centred design for exactly this reason. Whilst I'd never ask 'what do you want?' - so we don't end up building 'a faster horse' - I am very interested in people's needs, contexts, challenges, mental models and behaviours... as well shifts and trends in these things over time. That's how you find a strategy that works. Solve a need, especially an unmet or insufficiently met one... or - better yet - one that isn't visible yet. A business is nothing without customers, so keeping them at the heart of your strategy is everything. I love your updates, Dan Schultz. Solid gold.

Vivek V.S

Building products in logistics and agriculture

1 年

Oh! Succint post outlining the troubles with GTM. The current agri sales is heavily reliant on field staff. There is no new models that I see. You have any good agri examples of people creating a category?

Nathan Faleide

Appropriately Cynical AgTech Mentalist | Founder of Boundri | Podcast Host and Writer of Ag Uncensored | Co-Owner of Satshot | CPO at Farmwave |

1 年

Most past AgTech GTMs were the old underpants gnomes one I.E. create product…?…profits

  • 该图片无替代文字
Phi Tran

Freelance sdr bdr industry agnostic

1 年

“Hobby” farming is very useful for a tax shelter and for those in land development & real estate speculation I.e. California sprawl “Corporate farming” where the business model is already optimized

回复
查看更多评论

要查看或添加评论,请登录