I have an idea for a new Turing test, for the age of AI... Get a computer to "watch" a blockbuster film; and then it must write review (suitable for publication in Film or Empire or Guardian, New York Times, etc.), and if a panel of humans think it's human written then it passes the test. Thoughts?
Mel, Hollywood is ahead of you on this....computers are creating the movies, not the reviews. It starts with one of the endless franchises, reboots, remakes, sequels, prequels or creator stories. Calculates which mix of stars maximizes pull (no human would have matched Will Ferrell and Nicole Kidman as a onscreen couple). Picks a formulaic storyline ("boy meets girls" too gender specific so computer tries "man meets dog" or "girl meets robot") and the computer runs the numbers to see if it's profitable. Add CGI, or maybe skip live action entirely and go to animation, and the reality is we humans are squeezed out of the process when it comes to big-budget Hollywood.
Petteri Teikari, PhD I always thought that most academic reviews were very generic: that the reviewer liked/disliked the presentation, that the authors did/didn't cite all the relevant literature, that they found it interesting/uninteresting, all without proper justification, and finally a list of typos.
Yes! This is exactly what John R. Smith is working on with sound, visual recognition, NLU and other "clues". It's how he and his team created the Morgan trailer with IBM Watson and how Watson selects highlights of the Masters and US Open. @Joe Procopio has AI writing news articles at Automated Insights so a movie review isn't a stretch at all! The M&E industry has become much more open to AI for enhancing creative over the last 18 months.
Someone should do this right away, it would be awesome. Would be a great project for a CS class. I would love to try it. And the same test applies to reading papers, reading fiction, and other things. If a bunch of such AI existed it would be so interesting to see which areas they were better at - and which they failed miserably. I think reading scientific papers would have to be the hardest - and actually, a lot of humans might fail at that!
(personal bias) Would a better Turing test to have an AI system to do peer review on scientific manuscripts, and if the human domain expert peer reviewer would be convinced that the peer review is from an actual human that seems to know what is he talking about? Movie reviews I think could be very generic and one could think that most of the reviews are already written by bots e.g. https://www.wired.com/2017/02/ai-can-solve-peer-review-ai-can-solve-anything/
from the computer ;-)
Experienced public/ private director of corporate development and M&A
7 年Aha - that explains Transformers 12 perfectly