You don't make much money, and may have trouble paying for basic needs without government assistance.
Now you're up for a promotion, but might not want it if the pay raise is large enough to make you ineligible for that assistance, yet cannot adequately meet your needs without government aid.
This is what's described as the "cliff effect," in an article published Sunday, written by UMass Boston's Susan Crandall.
Workers who experience this effect — those in industries like retail, hospitality, and service — weigh the "risk of getting poorer while working harder," and in such a scenario, every party involved can lose, Crandall writes.
From the article: "The pain isn’t just personal. Josie’s whole family misses out if she passes on an opportunity to earn more. The government loses a chance to stop using taxpayer dollars to cover benefits to someone who might not otherwise need them. The hospital can’t take full advantage of Josie’s proven talents."
Before today, I'd hadn't heard of this term at all, but is anyone familiar with the cliff effect? Seen it firsthand with friends, family members or co-workers? Would love to get some thoughts on this.
#InService #InRetail
Store Manager at Hobby Lobby
I have been in retail for 29 years and can honestly say I have not turned down a promotion nor do I know of anyone who has ever turned down a promotion to stay on government assistance.