US Inventor

?????? ?????? 10 ???????????????????????? — ?????????????????? ???? ???????????????? (?????????? ???? ?????? ???????? ?????????????????? ???????? ???????? ???? ?????? ?????????????? ?????? ??.708) According to how Congress now writes laws — using "should" instead of "shall" — here are the updated Ten Commandments: 1. You ???????????? have no other gods before Me.? 2. You ???????????? not make any graven images.? 3. You ???????????? not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.? 4. You ???????????? remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.? 5. You ???????????? honor your father and your mother.? 6. You ???????????? not kill.? 7. You ???????????? not commit adultery.? 8. You ???????????? not steal.? 9. You ???????????? not bear false witness.? 10. You ???????????? not covet. See the problem? ???????????? “????????????” ?????????? ?? ?????????????????? ????????????????????? Great recommendation, NOT legislation. Congress DOESN'T WANT TO FIX things and it's getting sloppy. Whether it's patents or anything else, the pattern is the same. Meanwhile taxpayers are footing these bills that take months, sometimes years to develop.

US Inventor is at Synapse Summit in Tampa making allies. This event is for entrepreneurs and startups. #inventor #startup #invention #china #PTAB #patent #AmericanDream

Hi Friends, a patent bill is coming down the tracks with lots of big names pushing it. Big, big names. People who are highly respected. The problem needing to be fixed is injunctive relief (the ability to stop the infringer after having won a patent infringement case). THE WORDING OF THE BILL DOES NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. The bill says “...the patent owner shall be entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the court should grant a permanent injunction...” The court SHOULD grant a permanent injunction. How many laws exist with the text that you “should” do something? In the history of this great nation, has there EVER been a single law passed that says you “should” do something? Is this the first time this has ever happened? “Should” just leaves open the door to arguments as to why injunctive relief shouldn’t be allowed in any particular case. The hired guns of big corporations will use this weak language in every way possible. Why would so much money and effort be used in trying to pass a bill that obviously will not fix the problem? I think there are good people who have not considered the actual language of the bill and how it will be used. There are also large entities that don’t want a real fix and know that if this were to pass as written, it could be a decade or more before a real fix could be attempted. Language that would work is “The several courts having jurisdiction of cases under this title shall issue permanent injunctions against patent infringement absent exceptional circumstances.” (from Jeffrey E. Depp). Help us actually fix the problem by getting the language right. Contact the offices of your Senators and US Representatives and ask them for a Zoom meeting with yourself and executives of US Inventor. You don’t have to be an expert, you just have to be a constituent who cares about American inventors and startups. Make those calls and help us restore our rights. There are few things as important as this right now. Help us. Thankyou.

Will the Supreme Court take up this landmark patent case? The Justices will decide on Friday. Listen in for a full discussion with Jeff Parker, Amit Vora, and Juliette Fassett on Rule 36 and why the outcome of this case is so impactful to inventors and the future of our innovation economy! ParkerVision has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court and recently submitted a reply brief in an attempt to get the Court to take up this innovation-crippling practice. In the coming days, the justices are scheduled to discuss the petition in private conference, where they will vote on whether to take the case. ** Our Guests ** To help us unpack Rule 36 practice and what ParkerVision is hoping to do about it, Josh Sloat and I have enlisted the assistance of the three people closest to this case and its implications: ? Jeffrey Parker, CEO of ParkerVision – an absolute pioneer in wireless technology. ? Amit Vora, appellate litigator at Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, representing ParkerVision in its petition for cert with the Supreme Court. ? Juliette Fassett from the Fair Inventing Fund, advocating for inventors’ rights. Juliette is an inventor herself, with over 30 years of experience building consumer product companies. ** Watch/Listen/Read ???? ** ? Full video interview: https://lnkd.in/g__x4NhM ? Podcast audio: https://lnkd.in/gHzzugTm ? Blog: https://lnkd.in/ga9T3y-F #inventors #patents #propertyrights #dueprocess #dignity #SCOTUS #supremecourt #intellectualproperty #constitution #CAFC #federalcircuit

If you don't have time to watch this 1-hour podcast, I suggest you just give it a Rule 36. That means don't watch the podcast, just email Aurora Patents with a simple: RULE 36-affirmed. This tells them that you didn't watch the podcast, and you don't have a reason as to why you did or didn't. This is exactly what the Federal Circuit is doing to over 43% of inventors when they request an appeal on why their patents were cancelled at the PTAB. This is NOT an appeal. I received a Rule 36. It was humiliating. Thank you ParkerVision for taking the time and necessary action to bring this to the Supreme Court. Please share this podcast! (Don't send Aurora Patents a rule 36..) Aurora Patents Jeff Parker ParkerVision Juliette Fassett US Inventor

Our country has successfully stopped and continues to stop women from becoming successful. Doing basic math, I found that in 2010, just 24 women who were granted a US Patent statistically became a commercial success. Just 24! I was one of them in 2010! -In 2010, 244,341 people were granted a US Patent. -In 2010, 13.1% of those patents were granted to individuals = 31,973 -7.5% of those were women = 2,398 -.8% of patents go on to become a commercial success = 24 Keeping that trend, that means 336 women have become commercially successful in the United States since 2010. 336 women will face adversity with their IP, they will need their granted patent rights to stop their infringers. Why is it then, that I know nearly 100 women and counting, who have been stripped of their rights to protect their IP, have had their patents invalidated or are frightened to fight and keep what is theirs? Great job congress – you have successfully wiped out 33% of women’s dreams, businesses, their employees, and their morale. Want to help? Spend 2 minutes of your life and do this: 1. Sign the US Inventor Resolution: https://lnkd.in/gCzcXCAK 2. Help us secure a fair/balanced USPTO Director: https://lnkd.in/g9PDgjJm US Inventor Women in IP Kip Azzoni Doyle Carrie Hafeman Jodi Schwendimann Merritt Fletcher Juliette Fassett Joyz Medical Concepts Joy Young

"The future of America's innovation ecosystem is at a crossroads," said Randy Landreneau, President of US Inventor. "We can either continue to allow Big Tech to dominate and stifle competition, or we can fight back and restore the American Dream for inventors. Dana Rohrabacher is the leader we need to bring fairness back to the patent system and ensure that American innovation remains the world's gold standard." https://lnkd.in/gtsWn24y US Inventor #inventor #ptab #americandream Donald Trump Jr. Howard W. Lutnick Dana Rohrabacher Randy Landreneau

Use Your Voice to Change History – Before It's Too Late The Constitution starts with “We The People”—NOT “We The Corporations.” Yet today, corporate giants control our markets, our data, and our laws. Buckle up, it's about to get worse... UNLESS we can stop them! They climbed to the top using patents, then pulled up the ladder behind them—making sure the little guys like us can't compete. If we want real change, we need an independent thinker who will break this cycle—not more bureaucrats protecting corporate interests. Former U.S. Representative Dana Rohrabacher IS that person. Act NOW and sign the petition: https://lnkd.in/gs8nqQFH Share this. Your future depends on it.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ? Statement from US Inventor on Trump's Executive Order Creating a US Sovereign Wealth Fund ? Washington, D.C. – US Inventor?welcomes President Trump's Executive Order creating a sovereign wealth fund,?but this fund should be?aimed at fostering innovation and strengthening America’s economic competitiveness. We are?confident that the Trump administration recognizes?the critical importance of American made innovation and intellectual property as engines of growth. As an organization that represents?independent American inventors and startups, we urge that the fund be used in a way that truly benefits individual creators and small businesses who are the lifeblood of American innovation and manufacturing. A sovereign wealth fund has the potential to unlock significant opportunities for research, development, and American manufacturing, but it must prioritize the interests of those who have the creativity and ingenuity to drive transformative technologies forward. TikTok has been at the center of national security concerns. The fund has the potential to transform the landscape of American technology and innovation, creating more jobs, strengthening the economy, and enhancing our national security by positioning America to better compete with China tech giants like ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok. We strongly advocate for policies that ensure inventors, especially independent and small-scale entrepreneurs, have access to the resources and protections necessary to bring their inventions to market. As we move forward, it is essential that any new programs or investments stemming from the sovereign wealth fund are carefully structured to empower innovators at all stages, promote fair competition, and protect intellectual property rights. US Inventor stands ready to collaborate with policymakers to ensure that the sovereign wealth fund’s implementation supports a thriving innovation ecosystem for all Americans. #usinventor #inventor https://lnkd.in/gPJ98q_K

"The whole thing is shocking," said Scott E. Kamholz, PTAB judge. Shocking, he says, that he has to "go back to work." I reflect on this comment today, the same day my op-ed was published with IPWatchdog: Reflections from an Inventor on the Return to Office Mandate for PTAB Judges Link to article: https://lnkd.in/gYj_SpWC Scott and the PTAB judges' concerns about "returning to work" center around how it will affect their efficiency, timelines, and paperwork. But what’s missing from this discussion? The inventors. The very people whose life’s work has been challenged in these remote proceedings. I understand that many judges have families and personal obligations, and I don’t doubt that some believe they’re simply carrying out their duties. But let’s not ignore what those duties actually are—following a system designed with a built-in bias toward invalidating patents, currently over 80% of the patents it adjudicates. A system that has destroyed American businesses. Now, for the first time, the tables have turned. These judges are facing their own version of loss—having to return to work in person, relocate, or even leave their positions. It’s a real disruption to their lives and families, just as losing a patent at the PTAB has been a life-altering event for thousands of inventors. The impact is real, but maybe now, there’s a moment for reflection. Trump’s executive order has inadvertently exposed a systemic flaw in our patent system, and I hope you are all watching and listening. By forcing PTAB judges back to the office, it has shined a light on just how insulated they’ve been from the consequences of their decisions. Inventors like me are subjected, yes, we don't get to choose to be sent to this so-called "death squad," where our patents are invalidated with no regard for the work we’ve put in, the money we’ve invested, and the families we support. This isn’t just a flaw in the process. Inventors are systematically denied their right to defend what’s theirs. And now, as the very people who’ve upheld this flawed system face their own upheaval. If this feels like a harsh reality check for them, imagine what it’s been like for the inventors who have had to endure this for the last 14 years. US Inventor