Donald Trump doesn’t need to destroy the court system to get his way, Aziz Huq writes. He just needs to create a shadow zone where the law no longer applies. Welcome to America’s “prerogative state”:
关于我们
- 网站
-
https://www.theatlantic.com
The Atlantic的外部链接
- 所属行业
- 图书期刊出版业
- 规模
- 201-500 人
- 总部
- Washington,DC
- 类型
- 私人持股
- 创立
- 1857
地点
The Atlantic员工
动态
-
Andrew Cuomo is resurgent, Gavin Newsom is podcasting, and Rahm Emanuel is considering a presidential run. Are these the bullies Democrats need? Gal Beckerman asks. https://lnkd.in/eS7hmMSh A new NBC survey found that 65 percent of Democrats want their lawmakers to oppose Donald Trump even if it leads to gridlock, compared with 32 percent who are willing to broach some compromise. “Toughness, as a value, has long been a fixture in American politics—but it has been inescapable since 2016,” Beckerman notes. “In interview after interview following the latest election, voters told reporters that Trump’s pumping fist, raised seconds after July’s assassination attempt, sealed the deal for them.” But Beckerman questions whether toughness will work for candidates who merely attempt to mirror Trump’s modus operandi. “Democrats seem to have less patience for the kind of shamelessness and blame-shifting that are the president’s trademark. Emanuel and Cuomo are on the comeback trail precisely because they have already offended Democratic voters through Trumpian behavior,” Beckerman writes. As for Newsom, “in a much-mocked effort to show his ability to cut it in the manosphere, he has been hosting a podcast and has brought on right-wing figures including Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon as guests.” “Democrats would be better off finding their own model of toughness—not one that extols aggression and strong-arming,” Beckerman writes. “Maybe they should channel, as the Democratic strategist James Carville suggested, the fighting technique of the older Muhammad Ali … Absorb punches until Trump tires himself out or, more likely, the American people get tired of all the chaos and disruption.” Or maybe the way forward is “to put out a barrage of creative ideas, to flood the zone with stuff that will inevitably be better than anything Trump or Musk has to offer. Democrats believe in government, so they tend to govern better,” Beckerman continues. “Maybe what’s called for is a shadow Cabinet, like those organized by British opposition parties, with the Democrats demonstrating, day after day, what they could do if they were in charge.” Read more: https://lnkd.in/eS7hmMSh ??:The Atlantic / Getty
-
-
Many people roll their 20s through a sugar coating of nostalgia, Rainesford Stauffer wrote in 2021. But framing young adulthood as the best time of life is a little grim, as it puts a limit on growth. https://lnkd.in/eVAHGAMz ? This glorification of youth seems to assume that everyone has the same resources; moves on the same timeline, in the same way; and has the same kind of life, one filled with adventure and experimentation, Stauffer explained. Your 20s are “supposed to simultaneously be a golden age of rootless freedom and fearless exploration and, somewhat contradictorily, the time when you’re meant to figure out your career, your relationships, and your life goals. That’s a lot of pressure.”? ? To uncover what young adulthood really looks like, Stauffer spoke with several 20-somethings from different backgrounds and in all sorts of circumstances to learn how they understand this time in their life. “The young adults I talked with didn’t articulate far-flung fantasies of a #bestlife as Instagram illustrates it. They described a desire to simply feel like enough. They wanted more nuanced conversations about what making your way in the world as a young adult actually means,” Stauffer continued. Read more: https://lnkd.in/eVAHGAMz ??: Jonathan Knowles / Getty
-
-
“Over the past few decades, the credit-card market has quietly transformed into two credit-card markets: one offering generous benefits to wealthy Americans, the other offering expensive debt to the poor, with the latter subsidizing the former,” Annie Lowrey writes: https://lnkd.in/eh5xD3Cq “In the credit-card industry, the well-to-do are known as transactors. They pay off their balance in full every month, avoiding late fees and interest charges,” Lowrey continues. They use credit cards as a convenient payment method, and as a way to earn points. Given how valuable—and untaxed—these rewards are, transactors make money by spending money. “In contrast, the have-nots are known as revolvers. Revolvers are subprime borrowers who use credit cards as a payment tool and as a short-term loan, to cover surprise expenses and groceries the week before payday.” To cover “swipe” fees that credit-card companies charge, merchants hike up retail prices. Poorer families—who disproportionately pay with debit cards and cash—shoulder much of the burden, while transactors get juicy perks for using cards. Additionally, transactors benefit from the late fees and interest charges accumulated by revolvers, which credit-card companies use to help finance their rewards programs. American consumers have been charging more and more to their cards. Credit-card balances stand at an all-time high, and the share of borrowers who are late on their payments has reached its highest point since the aftermath of the Great Recession. “A strong economy with a brutal cost-of-living crisis is a great economy for the credit-card industry, it turns out,” Lowrey writes. “The revenue credit-card firms make from interest payments has ballooned from $76 billion in 2020 to $170 billion in 2024.” But a slowing economy is beginning to affect even the transactors. And “with markets swooning, card companies are offering fewer cards to subprime borrowers,” Lowrey continues at the link in our bio. “Relying on expensive debt, and paying fees that subsidize richer card users, is bad enough for poor Americans. Not having a credit card to fall back on might be worse.” Read more: https://lnkd.in/eh5xD3Cq ??: The Atlantic. Source: Getty.
-