The launch of the inaugural Interdisciplinary Science Rankings has demonstrated an inspiring global ambition to do science differently. https://lnkd.in/dBiVuqtj By bringing together perspectives, ideas, and skills, interdisciplinary science broadens our view and enhances our ability to innovate and solve the complex problems facing science and society.?? But it is challenging to do science differently, to cross the lines, to break down the barriers. Our aspiration in supporting the Times Higher Education Rankings was to fuel a global conversation: How can we best support the most creative and courageous interdisciplinary science at the individual, institutional, national, and international level? What can we do differently? With 749 institutions from 92 countries participating (the largest Rankings debut in Times Higher Education’s history) and more than 250 academic leaders, business leaders, researchers, funders, and policymakers joining a dedicated Forum to explore how we drive positive culture change, that conversation is now live. Massachusetts Institute of Technology was ranked number one and its Vice-President for Research Ian Waitz described the inaugural Rankings as an “impressive and audacious” project that would drive progress at scale across the research sector. And whilst established research regions performed strongly, the Rankings are also remarkable for the diversity of engaged institutions. Phil Baty, Times Higher Education’s Chief Global Engagement Officer, said the Rankings demonstrated a “real hunger across the world’s higher education sector to show their commitment to interdisciplinarity science and a desire to better understand, benchmark, and recognize their interdisciplinary work." And our Founding Executive Director Dr. Megan Kenna underlined the vital need to develop and adopt new approaches to science. ?“The solutions we need for the 21st century will not come from a single discipline. “They will come from the fertile intersection of fields like biology and data science or engineering and economics. “They will come from bringing together people who don’t think alike but who think differently, creatively, and courageously.” She added: “These rankings are more than a list — they are a statement of values, declaring that the future of science is collaborative, inclusive, and unafraid of complexity.”
-
+4