???????????????????? ??????’?? ?????????? ??????—????’?? ?????????? ?????? ????????????
When Carl Jung was asked to review James Joyce’s?Ulysses, he felt bored, irritated, and even mocked by the author’s chaotic narrative. At one point, he nearly dismissed Joyce as delusional. But then Jung stopped and reframed his thinking:
“What if this isn’t just a novel? What if it’s a piece of art?”
The true peace of art is always a psychological discovery. If this is an art, then the question needs to change. Instead of asking, “Who is the author?” he asked, “Who is the proper reader?” It took decades for the brilliance of?Ulysses?to be recognized when a new type of reader emerged—one capable of connecting with its revolutionary structure and depth.
This is the nature of innovation. When we first encounter it, it often feels foreign, uncomfortable, or absurd. It challenges our understanding of the present because it’s designed for a future that has yet to arrive.
Now, imagine Steve Jobs. But this time, he’s an employee at Blackberry or Nokia, pitching his groundbreaking idea:
“Let’s remove the buttons and create a touchscreen phone.”
Picture the reactions from his managers - I want to hear in comments what you think they would say :)
Being innovative is not about saying cool things; it requires humility. It asks us to admit when we don’t fully understand and challenges us to listen, even if the vision feels incomprehensible at first. The breakthroughs we resist today may be the foundations of tomorrow’s reality.
So here’s my question for you:
How do you challenge your thinking to say "GO" for something you don't fully understand?
If you like the post, please hit share so more people can see it.