Legacy page for Rogers Insurance的封面图片
Legacy page for Rogers Insurance

Legacy page for Rogers Insurance

保险业

Danville,California 206 位关注者

Your Protection is our ONLY Business, now a part of Acrisure Insurance

关于我们

Multi-line Insurance Brokerage specializing in: Homeowners insurance Auto insurance Umbrella insurance Flood insurance Earthquake insurance Tow truck insurance Gas Station Insurance Boat & Yacht Insurance

网站
www.Acrisure.com/West
所属行业
保险业
规模
超过 10,001 人
总部
Danville,California
类型
私人持股
创立
1999
领域
Auto Insurance、Business Insurance、Business Owners Package (BOP) Insurance、Flood Insurance、Home Insurance、Insurance Bonds、Landlords Insurance、Umbrella Insurance、Workers Comp Insurance、Tow Truck Insurance、Truck Insurance和Workers Comp Insurance

地点

  • 主要

    156 DIABLO RD

    STE 210

    US,California,Danville,94526

    获取路线

Legacy page for Rogers Insurance员工

动态

  • Confusing and DANGEROUS Insurance Terminology ! There is a ridiculous amount of junk and pure "BS" in some of the policies we come across. So, we decided to pick one term we have to deal with on a daily basis ( as do you if you own any commerical property at all): the term "Co-Insurance" One of the most dangerous concepts in insurance is "co-insurance". I say dangerous because if you don't understand it, you can get burned by your own uninformed decisions. Insurance companies determined that by taking a little bit of money (premium) from lots of people, they could afford to pay for huge losses of only a few of those people. Based on expected losses they decided how much premium to charge. And an assumption they made was that everybody would insure their property fully. Policyholders quickly realized that most losses are small - rarely a total loss. So, instead of insuring their $500,000 building for $500,000, they insured it for less - risking that they wouldn't suffer a total loss. This wrecked the insurance companies' ability to pay losses and be profitable, too. So, the insurance companies invented "co-insurance" - which basically means: if you don't insure the full value of your property, you're going to share in the partial losses. A simple example: if you have a building worth $1,000,000 and insure it for $800,000, you've insured 80% of value. If there's a total loss, you only get $800,000 because that's the coverage limit you chose. That's NOT co-insurance. That's coverage limits. Co-insurance comes into play on PARTIAL losses. In this example, if you have a partial loss, of say $100,000, the insurance company will only pay $80,000 ... because you only insured 80% of the full value and 80% of $100,000 is $80,000. You pay the other $20,000. That's co-insurance...AND , it's in addition to your deductible. That's a pretty compelling reason to insure to full value. Wait! There's one last landmine here ... To determine if a co-insurance penalty will apply, the value of your property will be determined at the time of loss - NOT what it was worth when you bought it, NOT what it was worth when you bought your policy, and NOT what you say it's worth. The insurance company will determine the value of your property at the time the loss occurred. Why is this important? Let's say you paid $100,000 for your building 5 years ago, and insured it for $100,000 - fully insured, no chance for a co-insurance penalty. And let's say the building is worth $120,000 today, but you didn't increase your insurance. Now there's a partial loss, the insurance company values your building at $120,000 and says, "A co-insurance penalty applies, because your insured value of $100,000 is less than 90% of the building's real value of $120,000." What a nasty surprise. Ultimately, your insurance decisions are yours. Be an educated consumer and make sure you get what you want. Give me a call if you want to discuss any of your coverage limits.

  • 查看Orlando Frasca的档案

    Principal @ Acrisure | Award-Winning Insurance Brokerage

    Hello Landlords, The question about your Tenant's Liquor Liability coverage has come up a couple of times in the last 2 weeks or so.... Short version is that YOU, as the Landlord, may NOT be covered for any Liquor-based claims that your Restaurant/Bar/Nightclub tenant may have. Tenant’s Liquor Liability refers to the potential legal responsibility that a tenant (such as a restaurant or bar) may have for alcohol-related incidents that occur on the leased premises. Here are the key points: Leasing to Bars or Restaurants Serving Alcohol: When a landlord leases space to a business that serves alcohol (like a sports bar), they need to consider liquor liability. Even if the lease doesn’t explicitly require it, chances are the tenant already has liquor liability insurance. However, the lease’s indemnification language and the tenant’s insurance policy structure matter. Contractual Obligations: Depending on the lease terms, the tenant might be contractually obligated to defend the landlord in alcohol-related claims. If the tenant’s insurance doesn’t cover the landlord, the landlord (or their insurer) may need to defend themselves until the indemnification can be enforced against the tenant. Landlord’s Vicarious Liability: In some states, landlords can be held liable for their tenant’s actions. While this typically applies to criminal actions, it’s possible that vicarious liability could extend to liquor liability claims based on state dram shop laws. Gross negligence by the landlord (e.g., ignoring tenant alcohol sales to minors) could exacerbate this situation. Tenant’s Insurance Coverage: The first question a landlord might ask is whether the tenant’s insurance will cover them. Typically, liquor liability coverage is added to the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy using a separate coverage form. The lease indemnification will NOT trigger the tenant’s insurer to defend the landlord unless specifically listed in the endorsement. Some Business Owners Policies (BOPs) may modify the general liability coverage part to include liquor liability. Landlord’s General Liability Policy: The landlord’s general liability policy won’t automatically cover liquor liability claims arising from the tenant’s actions. If the tenant is a tavern, their CGL policy’s liquor exclusion applies to any insured, including additional insureds like the landlord. Therefore, landlords should structure leases to require tenants to carry separate liquor liability coverage. Best Practices for Landlords: Require tenants to carry liquor liability coverage with adequate limits. Review tenant certificates of insurance to ensure they have the correct policies in place to protect everyone involved. Remember, each situation is unique, so it’s essential for landlords and tenants to consult with legal and insurance professionals to navigate these complexities effectively. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask! 😊

相似主页

查看职位