PeerReviewMe.org is transforming academic publishing with a structured, multi-step peer review system. We offer certifications in crowd review, pre-review, traditional peer review, image forensics, and expert error spotting, across Science, Technology, Math, and Engineering fields. Reviewers get paid for their work—especially through our expert error spotting program—ensuring both engagement and fast turnaround times. Our portable peer review certification lets researchers and publishers transfer peer review feedback between journals, saving time, reducing duplication, and cutting costs. By shifting the responsibility for research integrity from publishers to us, we foster greater accountability, streamline the publication process, and reward reviewers for their expertise, all while accelerating the dissemination of knowledge.
PeerReviewMe的外部链接
US，New York，New York
We pay our certified expert error spotters ????
Paying reviewers $250 improved reviewer agreement to review by a modest 7 percentage points. The reviewers were likely too time-poor to be incentivized much? Might be different if now sent to the thousands of U.S. researchers who no longer have a job! :( https://lnkd.in/gvziTNvQ CC: James Heathers, PhD
Tony Alves - sounds just like a private discussion you had with us several months ago!
Just published in Council of Science Editors (CSE)'s Science Editor - "Diversification and Decentralization of Peer Review: Part 1—Initiatives at the Forefront" (https://lnkd.in/eqHVGqRk). This started out as a poster at the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association annual meeting, and with the help of several folks involved in the initiatives I discuss, it has evolved into a two-part overview of the community peer review ecosystem. Also published, Diversification and Decentralization of Peer Review: Part 2—Tools That Facilitate (https://lnkd.in/exxMJkUh). This is also where I acknowledge those who reviewed early versions!
Asegid Getachew - wonderful post ?
Next time! Our fault for not being more visible, cos we did not get included ....New paper by Asegid Getachew .... lnkd.in/dZ_yT9SX Really useful: Peer Review Recognition Summary Table: lnkd.in/dVadCZaT #ResearchIntegrity #PublishingIntegrity
PeerReviewMe转发了
Which universities have the most retracted articles - and the highest retraction rates? For Nature Magazine, here's a first-of-its-kind analysis of retractions by institutions. Full details in the story at https://lnkd.in/ezeFsuRb
PeerReviewMe转发了
Dean Lee out here asking the hard questions! The answer is www.PeerReviewMe.org which offers a professionalized, multi-step commercial peer review model that integrates advanced peer review verification techniques and robust training/certification programs for peer reviewers - such as getting paid as a certified expert error spotter! As far as authors and publishers are concerned, PeerReviewMe is assuming the responsibility for research integrity, as we shift the burden from publishers to our organization. This can help your organization foster greater accountability and trust within your community. The innovative framework provides a clear, systematic approach to evaluating research across the scientific, technological, mathematical, and engineering disciplines, ensuring that each participant receives industry-specific training that addresses their unique needs. Training modules and certifications offered by www.PeerReviewMe.org are crafted to provide participants with the essential skills and knowledge necessary for effective contribution to the peer review process and remember: certified expert error spotters are compensated by PeerReviewMe for their expertise and time, ensuring their availability and faster turnaround times. As an author, institution, or publisher by completing all review steps, including crowd review, pre-review, traditional peer review, image forensics, and paid error spotting, a paper, or a the entity at large, can earn a portable peer review certification from www.PeerReviewMe.org!
Figure One Lab: A Gateway Computational Biology Experience | 1887 Code-Enabled Biologists and Counting
If I were a traditional life sciences journal, I’d be sweating right now. Because NIH funding will be seriously squeezed for a number of years, PIs will hesitate to hire new trainees and start new projects. Which means the number of publishable studies will soon drop substantially; there will just be less science happening across the board. Also, when scientists are trying to conserve funds, fewer will see the sense in forking over $3-12K per article to publish. Fewer will continue to volunteer their time to be peer reviewers. The entire business model of these journals is in question. And it was already a strange business model to begin with. Those planning and executing the scientific studies, writing and reviewing them, publishing them, and then paying to consume what they just published are the same group of people: mostly scientists at research institutes. The producers are somehow also the consumers ??. It’s a closed loop. And every phase of this closed loop is done using NIH funds. So if NIH funding stops coming, the entire loop is jeopardized. Under sufficient economic pressure, who’s to say that these life scientists won’t ditch the traditional publishing norms for something else? This is the same group of people who have all recently rallied their own migration from X to Bluesky, showing a willingness to experiment with new avenues of connecting and content sharing. Who’s to say they won’t just decide to bypass traditional journals and publish directly on bioRxiv, at least for a few years? Or even Substack, which would allow them to generate subscription income from their findings? And peer review (paid) could still be coordinated on platforms like ResearchHub. Thinking out loud here. Curious to hear views from both sides.
PeerReviewMe转发了
PeerReviewMe.org revolutionizes peer review with a structured, multi-step model that integrates advanced verification techniques and direct incentives—yes, peer reviewers get paid. By taking on research integrity oversight, we relieve publishers of this burden, helping your organization build greater trust and accountability within your community. Our systematic approach spans scientific, technological, mathematical, and engineering disciplines, with industry-specific training to ensure reviewers are well-equipped for the task. Certified reviewers—expert error spotters—are compensated for their time, ensuring higher engagement and faster turnaround times. Authors, institutions, and publishers who complete all review steps—including crowd review, pre-review, traditional peer review, image forensics, and paid error spotting—can earn a portable peer review certification from PeerReviewMe.org. Learn more: https://lnkd.in/gEwBHKmQ #Scholarly #OpenAccess #Publishing #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
Peer review is broken—but we’re fixing it. At PeerReviewMe.org, we’ve built a multi-tiered peer reviewer certification system to bring quality, transparency, and accountability back to scholarly publishing. We offer certifications in crowd review, pre-review services, traditional peer review, image forensic services, and paid error spotters, ensuring every peer reviewer undergoes rigorous, multi-layered training at each stage. What makes us different? First, all of our reviewers start to get the credit they deserve, day one, by signing up for Reviewer Credits. Then, those who complete all certifications are eligible to become paid error spotters on behalf our company and GET PAID TO PEER REVIEW ? For authors and publishers: If you subscribe to putting your research through all stages of our standardized and professional peer review, you will receive a “Portable Peer Review Certification”. Authors and publishers can carry validated reviews across publishers—reducing redundancy, cutting delays, and improving research integrity. If not, we offer each level of peer review à la carte. It’s time to rethink peer review. Join us. Visit PeerReviewMe.org to learn more!
Strongly agree with Reviewer Credits here! When an author or publisher completes all review steps, including crowd review, pre-review, traditional peer review, image forensics, and paid error spotting, a paper, can earn a portable peer review certification ? Learn more here: https://lnkd.in/gV378NiE
Heard about Portable Peer Review? ?? lnkd.in/d4HBMkHi ?? How does it work? Portable peer review lets researchers transfer peer review feedback from one journal to another if their manuscript is resubmitted elsewhere after a rejection. The feedback they receive can follow their manuscript, helping speed up the publishing process. That’s less work for reviewers and editors. The Portable Peer Review model streamlines the review process and reshapes the academic publishing landscape. But, naturally, this mode of peer review has pros and cons. While it saves time and effort, making disseminating new research faster and more efficient, it also raises concerns about review quality and appropriateness because standards can vary between journals. We dig into the benefits and possible shortcomings from a journal editor’s perspective and in the interest of transparent and effective review and research. ?? lnkd.in/d4HBMkHi
Reviewer Credits highlighting the benifits of paid peer reviewers. We strongly agree with this concept and will facilitate paid peer reviews to certified peer reviewers in our program. Check out www.PeerReviewMe.org to learn more about our startup! #Scholarly #OpenAccess #Publishing #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #ResearchViaibility #SocietalImpact
It's crucial to recognize & compensate researchers working for publishers performing peer review -> reviewercredits.com ...... ?? WHY? Reviewer Credits