Parity.Org的封面图片
Parity.Org

Parity.Org

非盈利组织

When the playing field is truly level, it's anyone's game.

关于我们

Parity.Org is the leading impact organization unlocking diversity in organizational leadership, where the gap is the widest. We’ve helped hundreds of companies worldwide–from Airbnb to Nasdaq to Ralph Lauren to Best Buy and beyond–quickly level the playing field to ensure that all employees have an equal shot at success. While many organizations have been working on leadership diversity for decades (with slow or negligible progress), our uniquely pragmatic approach works, and works fast. Organizations that take our ParityPLEDGE? and implement the best practices outlined in our ParityMODELs? find that diversity follows as a matter of course–no quotas or deadlines needed. Because when the playing field is truly level, it’s anyone’s game. Learn more at Parity.Org.

网站
https://parity.org
所属行业
非盈利组织
规模
11-50 人
总部
New York
类型
非营利机构
创立
2017
领域
Leadership、Racial Equity和Gender Equity

地点

Parity.Org员工

动态

  • 查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    There has perhaps never been a more important time for organizations of all sizes and across all industries to publicly declare their continued commitment to equal opportunity for all–and earning a spot on our prestigious?Best Companies for Equal Advancement Opportunity?is a powerful way to do just that.? ? Also known as the?ParityLIST?, this annual honor roll?recognizes organizations that have taken concrete steps to remove bias and barriers and create a more level playing field.?The application questionnaire takes less than 15 minutes to complete and includes a series of straightforward, yes/no questions about the policies and practices your organization employs to ensure that every individual has an equal opportunity to be recruited, hired, evaluated, and promoted into the highest levels of leadership.? ? The 2025 ParityLIST application period is now open and runs through April 18th at 5pm EST. Honorees will be announced in May.?Apply now at: https://lnkd.in/giNQ_cAE

  • 查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    At a time when African Americans remain grossly underrepresented in leadership, when dis-information about DEI and merit-based hiring runs rampant, and when Black history (and Black History Month itself) is being silenced--we continue to fight. Karsonya (Kaye) Wise Whitehead, Ph.D. and The Association for the Study of African American Life and History (founders of Black History Month) released a powerful statement about the importance of keeping the truth alive and continuing to celebrate the incredible contributions that Black people have and continue to make in our nation and our workplaces. Click the link below to read the full statement. https://lnkd.in/gr3VjBrT

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Parity.Org转发了

    查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    MEI vs DEI… As our President Dina Schenk, M.S. explains in this article published by SHRM earlier this week, the old (but newly re-branded) concept of Meritocracy doesn’t work. “Due to Affinity Bias, when we attempt to hire based on 'merit, excellence, and intelligence' without simultaneously?taking steps to mitigate our preference for the familiar, we can’t help but fail to objectively assess who has the most merit and is, therefore, the best person for the job." Read on for more of her thoughts on why modern DEI strategies work, and why we need to safeguard them. https://lnkd.in/g_ZmthBa

  • Parity.Org转发了

    查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    History can teach us a lot about maintaining momentum for social movements during periods of resistance. As the following Harvard Business Review article explains, "sometimes movements go into abeyance, which essentially means that the strong networks and identities built in the up-phase of the cycle of change help nurture ongoing efforts during periods of stagnation and reduced visibility...In the period between the U.S. suffrage movement in the early 1920s and the so-called second wave feminism of the 1960s and ’70s, activists sustained the broader women’s movement through interpersonal networks and friendships, informal reading groups, social gatherings, and salons. These strategies allowed them to maintain a feminist collective identity so that when the opportunity structure opened up again in the 1960s, feminists were ready to take advantage of public sentiment, allies in high places, and quiet on the part of those who didn’t agree with the feminist agenda. This led to concerted efforts to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment during the 1970s." As disheartening as this period of DEI backlash can be, let’s hunker down and keep our eyes on the prize. https://hubs.li/Q02TqbSP0

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Parity.Org转发了

    查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    Once more for the people in the back. ?? DEI is not about providing unfair advantages to certain groups. It's about ELIMINATING unfair advantages so that every individual has an equal chance to compete. Because, unless the playing field is truly level, you'll never find and hire the "best person for the job."

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Parity.Org转发了

    查看Erika Randall的档案

    Content Director, HR Daily Advisor, EHS Daily Advisor, Facilities Management Advisor, PSQH

    M-E-I. It was a nice try. But according to Dina Schenk, M.S., president at Parity.Org, the acronym MEI (merit, excellence, and intelligence) doesn’t and shouldn’t replace DEI. Check out why she says MEI is a big meh and why it doesn’t work. https://lnkd.in/g72E5CuN HR Daily Advisor #MEIOutDEIIn #DiversityEquityInclusion #HRDEILeaders

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • 查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    MEI vs DEI… As our President Dina Schenk, M.S. explains in this article published by SHRM earlier this week, the old (but newly re-branded) concept of Meritocracy doesn’t work. “Due to Affinity Bias, when we attempt to hire based on 'merit, excellence, and intelligence' without simultaneously?taking steps to mitigate our preference for the familiar, we can’t help but fail to objectively assess who has the most merit and is, therefore, the best person for the job." Read on for more of her thoughts on why modern DEI strategies work, and why we need to safeguard them. https://lnkd.in/g_ZmthBa

  • 查看Parity.Org的组织主页

    3,630 位关注者

    History can teach us a lot about maintaining momentum for social movements during periods of resistance. As the following Harvard Business Review article explains, "sometimes movements go into abeyance, which essentially means that the strong networks and identities built in the up-phase of the cycle of change help nurture ongoing efforts during periods of stagnation and reduced visibility...In the period between the U.S. suffrage movement in the early 1920s and the so-called second wave feminism of the 1960s and ’70s, activists sustained the broader women’s movement through interpersonal networks and friendships, informal reading groups, social gatherings, and salons. These strategies allowed them to maintain a feminist collective identity so that when the opportunity structure opened up again in the 1960s, feminists were ready to take advantage of public sentiment, allies in high places, and quiet on the part of those who didn’t agree with the feminist agenda. This led to concerted efforts to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment during the 1970s." As disheartening as this period of DEI backlash can be, let’s hunker down and keep our eyes on the prize. https://hubs.li/Q02TqbSP0

    • 该图片无替代文字

相似主页

查看职位