Noetica

Noetica

科技、信息和网络

AI-powered knowledge extraction from complex financial documents

关于我们

Reach out to [email protected] to learn more!

网站
https://www.noetica.io
所属行业
科技、信息和网络
规模
11-50 人
总部
New York
类型
私人持股

地点

Noetica员工

动态

  • Noetica转发了

    查看Daniel Wertman的档案,图片

    Co-Founder & CEO at Noetica

    “?????????????? ????????” is like a game of shuffleboard.? Let me explain. Player 1 goes first and lands on 10. Player 2 goes second and knocks Player 1’s disc from 10 to 7, with Player 2’s disc staying on 10. The strategy seems pretty obvious to anyone who’s played shuffleboard: place more discs closer to the top of the board to block the opposing player’s shot, thereby protecting your disc’s placement on 10. “Priming debt” effectively subordinates existing debt to new debt, giving borrowers more time to forestall a restructuring or bankruptcy while utilizing existing collateral. But priming debt isn’t always possible if deals include “sacred rights” blockers. With liability management transactions becoming more prevalent—and borrowers using loopholes to raise priming debt with the approval of a bare majority of lenders—you’d expect increasing prevalence of “sacred rights” blockers in new deals as a counterbalance. Interestingly, that hasn’t been the case. In Q3 ‘24, 74% of publicly filed credit agreements required all lenders to consent to amendments to pro rata sharing provisions, consistent with the same period in 2023. Similarly, in Q3 ‘24, 43% required all lenders to consent to subordination of liens, with 42% requiring the same in Q3 ‘23. Message me if you’d like access to the deal data on “sacred rights” provisions.

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • 查看Noetica的公司主页,图片

    889 位关注者

    查看Daniel Wertman的档案,图片

    Co-Founder & CEO at Noetica

    "????????????????" is the holy grail for borrowers—not so much for lenders. Manipulation of EBITDA through cost savings addbacks can increase a borrower’s ability to incur priming debt, move assets from the credit group via dividends or asset transfers, or even avoid an event of default under a financial covenant. While uncapped addbacks remain relatively rare, high caps and long look-forward periods still provide significant flexibility for borrowers. In the third quarter of 2024, 34% of publicly filed high yield credit agreements permitted cost savings-based addbacks to EBITDA, compared to only 20% of such deals in the same period in 2023. Of deals allowing such add-backs, none permitted uncapped addbacks in Q3 2024, compared to 3% in Q3 2023. However, in Q3 2024, 78% of deals permitting cost savings addbacks included caps equal to or greater than 20% of EBITDA, compared to 53% of such deals in Q3 2023. In addition, 17% of such deals in Q3 2024 included a look-forward period of 24 months or greater, compared to 47% of Q3 2023.?? Message me if you’d like access to the deal data underlying the EBITDA addbacks.

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • 查看Noetica的公司主页,图片

    889 位关注者

    查看Daniel Wertman的档案,图片

    Co-Founder & CEO at Noetica

    Basically my whole career, I’ve been reading Matt Levine's writing. His column is part of why I became interested in finance and law in the first place, and it made me laugh at times when I most needed a pick-me-up after a long day. It’s truly a full circle moment to see him feature Noetica AI in his column today. Taking a second to cherish this complete fanboy moment. https://lnkd.in/eBT-hXMD

    • 该图片无替代文字

相似主页