Hyperscale

GPT Block Diagram: Theory of Operation and Description The GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) block diagram represents the architecture of a large language model. It illustrates how components work together to process and generate text efficiently. GPT models have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) by enabling machines to understand and generate human-like text with unprecedented accuracy. This article explores the internal workings of GPT by breaking down its modular design and describing each subsystem in detail. Theory of Operation GPT transforms raw text input into meaningful output through the following steps: 1) Input Preprocessing: Text is tokenized and enriched with positional information. 2) Core Processing: The transformer core applies self-attention and feedforward mechanisms to generate embeddings. 3) Output Generation: Embeddings are transformed into probabilities over the vocabulary. 4) Training: A loss function guides weight updates via backpropagation. Diagram Components 1. Input Layer - Converts raw text into a processable format. - Tokenizer: Splits text into tokens compatible with the model's vocabulary. - Positional Encoder: Adds positional information to tokens to preserve sequence order. 2. Transformer Core - Performs computational tasks to generate context-aware representations. - Multi-Head Attention: Captures relationships between tokens using multiple attention heads. - Feedforward Network: Applies non-linear transformations to attention outputs. - Residual + Norm: Stabilizes training with skip connections and normalization. 3. Multi-Head Attention Subsystem - Enhances token embeddings using attention mechanisms. - Query, Key, Value: Transforms embeddings into vectors to compute relevance. - Attention Scores: Measures token relevance and normalizes with softmax. - Weighted Summation: Produces context-aware outputs based on scores. 4. Output Layer - Converts embeddings into probabilities over the vocabulary. - Linear Layer: Projects embeddings into logits (raw scores). - Softmax: Converts logits into probabilities. 5. Loss Function - Guides training by comparing predictions with targets. Uses cross-entropy loss to compute errors. Outputs gradients for backpropagation. Connections Forward Pathways: Data flows sequentially from the Input Layer through the Transformer Core to the Output Layer. Backpropagation: Gradients flow backward from the Loss Function to optimize weights. Conclusion GPT represents a landmark achievement in artificial intelligence, combining advanced neural network architectures with innovative training techniques. The modular design of GPT, as outlined in the block diagram, enables it to process text with remarkable flexibility and precision. Each subsystem contributes to its ability to understand context, generate coherent text, and improve iteratively through training.

Satellite software has evolved from simple code in the early days to sophisticated, AI-driven systems in modern satellites, adapting to increasingly complex challenges. Early Satellites: Basic Automation (1950s-1960s) The first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1 (1957), had minimal software, emitting a basic "beep" to signal its location. Explorer 1 (1958) took a step further, collecting radiation data. Software was limited to simple, hard-coded instructions—the digital equivalent of flipping switches. Memory was scarce, so every instruction had to be efficient. Automation and Control Systems (1970s-1980s) As satellites like Landsat began collecting Earth images, autonomous software became essential. Satellites now had microprocessors, enabling them to run programs that could automate tasks like data collection and transmission. Software handled timing and conditional actions, allowing basic autonomy and enabling satellites to perform scheduled tasks without constant ground control. Advanced Control and Reliability (1990s-2000s) By the 1990s, satellites were essential for applications like GPS and telecommunications, requiring precise orientation and real-time reliability. Software now handled error-checking, data compression, and satellite positioning, often using languages like C and C++. Real-time operating systems (RTOS) allowed prioritized task management and resilience through redundancy. Autonomy and Intelligence with AI (2010s - Present) Modern satellites, especially in constellations like Starlink, rely on advanced autonomy. Equipped with AI-driven fault detection, they can adjust orbits, manage orientation, and resolve minor issues independently. Machine learning onboard enables pattern recognition (e.g., deforestation) to prioritize data before transmission. Constellation software also coordinates collision avoidance and data routing, creating an integrated network. Modern Satellite Software Stack Today’s satellite software is organized in layers: 1. Operating System Layer: A specialized RTOS for time-critical tasks. 2. Flight Control Software: Manages orientation and orbit. 3. Data Processing Layer: Filters and analyzes data with machine learning. 4. Communication Layer: Ensures secure, reliable communication. 5. Fault Management: Detects and mitigates issues autonomously. Future Challenges As satellite constellations expand, software must scale to coordinate thousands of units. Enhanced autonomy and AI will allow satellites to operate independently over long distances and perform advanced data analysis. Each advancement in satellite software pushes the boundaries of space exploration, solidifying satellites' role in our interconnected world. From basic signals to intelligent decision-making, satellite software has come a long way and will keep evolving to meet new demands in space and on Earth. #SpaceTech #AIInSpace #SatelliteInnovation #FutureOfSatellites #SpaceExploration #SmartSatellites #ConnectedWorld

Just arrived! Our new Bambu Carbon X1 with quadruple AMS’s that will enable us to print in 16 colors in a 10x10x10in build volume.

We have to tip our hats to those who came before us... "Robert D. Reed, Research Division Engineer with the NASA Flight Research Center, was fond of building flying models. While recognizing that models are limited in the range of information they can return, he knew they could validate basic stability and control characteristics of a new configuration... In 1962, Reed built a 24-inch model of the M2, which he launched from a larger "mothership" having a 60-inch wing spread--a typical FRC approach scaled down in size. Reed's wife filmed some of the flights to show center director Paul Bikle, deputy director De Beeler, and Alfred Eggers. Reed also flew small lifting body models down the corridors at FRC, causing raised eyebrows among skeptics. But Eggers promised the use of wind tunnels at Ames, and Bikle authorized a 6-month feasibility study of a cheap, manned, lightweight M2 glider, the "next step" suggested by Reed--who also flew sailplanes as a hobby." - The Hypersonic Revolution, Volume II, Air Force History and Museums Program The resulting vehicle became the M2-F1, which Chuck Yaeger flew, and together with HL-10 and SV-5P/X-24A were precursors to the X-38 and todays Dream Chaser. It all started at NASA FRC in a little area technicians set aside as "Wright's Bicycle Shop", the beginnings of the current "Dale Reed Flight Research Laboratory, or NASA Armstrong Model Shop. What a legacy! Anthony Dean, (founder of VectorCraft) worked on the X-56 program - another NASA AFRC subscale model project - and frequented the Model Shop. "left to right: Richard C. Eldredge, Dale Reed, James O. Newman, Bob McDonald with the mothership (top) and other models. Over the years, the Dryden Flight Research Center and its predecessors has flown various models to gather data for various purposes. The mothership has been used to launch the models." Image Credit: NASA Source: https://lnkd.in/gTVAF_29

What would X-30 National Aero Space Plane look like today? Here’s what AI has to say. First iteration. #howtotrainyourai

Probably the best breakdown of drone use cases can be found in Dr. Qassim Abdullah's "Geospatial Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems, Classification of the Unmanned Aerial Systems": "The two main classifications for UAS missions are the following: 1) The military mission: Military applications focus on weapons delivery and guided missile support,?as well as directing artillery and spotting enemy positions. 2) The civilian mission:?Civilian applications of UAS are open to the imagination, and only time will tell of the future missions of UAVs for civilian applications. As of today, civilian missions include various applications such as: - security awareness; - disaster response, including search and support to rescuers; - communications and broadcast, including news/sporting event coverage; - cargo transport; - spectral and thermal analysis; - critical infrastructure monitoring and inspection, including power facilities, ports, bridges, and pipelines; - commercial photography, aerial mapping and charting, and advertising. On the geospatial and mapping applications side, the UAS can be used for the following activities: - aerial photography - mapping - LIDAR - volumetric surveys - digital mapping - contour mapping - topographic mapping??? - digital terrain modeling - aerial surveys - photogrammetry - temporal/spatial correlation for terrain reconstruction - geophysical survey Military and civilian missions of UAS overlap in many areas. They both use UAS for reconnaissance and surveillance. In addition, they both use UAS as a stationary platform over a point on the ground from which to perform many of the communications or remote sensing satellite functionalities with a fraction of the cost." Geospatial Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems, Qassim A. Abdullah, Ph.d. CP, PLS, Pennsylvania State University https://lnkd.in/dsng-7Xz Image credit: DALL-E https://lnkd.in/g2ZZ5upN