Simulation Nation转å‘了
I Am Not a Human Simulator. Lately, I've noticed a shift in language where standardized patients (SPs) are being referred to as?human simulators.?Let me be clear—I am not a piece of equipment to be?used.?I am a trained professional, meticulously prepared to portray patients and provide meaningful feedback that enhances the learning experience. SPs are integral to the simulation process, working alongside simulationists and simulation technologists to create immersive, high-quality learning experiences. Diminishing our role to that of a machine takes away the human component of our craft and undervalues our contributions. Words matter. If you say you?use?standardized patients rather than?work with?them, what does that say about your approach to simulation? The term?human simulation?as a modality is powerful, but referring to SPs as?simulators?is both inaccurate and dehumanizing. This is also why?earpieces can be so damaging in simulation.?Using them assumes that SPs are not trained well enough to engage and respond accurately in the scenario. It suggests that someone else?knows better?and must feed them lines, rather than trusting their expertise. But that’s an entirely different post. Let’s elevate the conversation. Are you truly collaborating with your SPs, or are you treating them as just another tool? Let’s ensure our language reflects the respect and value SPs bring to simulation. Are we really trying to take the human nature out of healthcare? What are your thoughts? How does your simulation center engage with SPs? #StandardizedPatients #SimulationEducation #HumanSimulation #HealthcareSimulation Amy Cowperthwait