Gipson Hoffman & Pancione的封面图片

关于我们

The law firm of Gipson Hoffman & Pancione is committed to advancing and protecting our clients’ interests with thorough, expert, and diligent service. Our attorneys provide creative and practical solutions for the complex demands of a changing legal and business environment. GHP was founded in 1983 by a group of successful attorneys looking to build a firm that offers streamlined and integrated services across a growing range of practice areas: business transactions, entertainment & finance, intellectual property, litigation, real estate, trusts & estates, and more. Our focus remains steadily on the immediate and long-term objectives of a wide range of clients. GHP is headquartered in Los Angeles and serves clients throughout the United States and around the globe. The attorneys of Gipson Hoffman & Pancione would be pleased to discuss how we might serve your legal needs. Find out more at www.ghplaw.com

网站
https://www.ghplaw.com
所属行业
律师事务所
规模
11-50 人
类型
私人持股
创立
1983

地点

Gipson Hoffman & Pancione员工

动态

  • GHP attorney Dan Lifschitz was interviewed by Bloomberg Law for a new article delving into the complexities of bringing idea theft claims under California law without running afoul of its anti-SLAPP statute. You can read Dan's additional thoughts on the subject below and the full article from Aruni Soni here: https://lnkd.in/g-hQ29Kd

    查看Aruni Soni的档案

    Reporter at Bloomberg Law

    #Hollywood thrives on ideas—but in California, when a screenwriter feels like a big studio has stolen one, it’s become increasingly hard to sue them over it. Large media studios faced with #idea theft claims in #California have resorted to playing a powerful #FirstAmendment card to freeze the lawsuits, which attorneys say has severely tilted the scales against creatives in the state. That card is an anti-SLAPP motion under the California's law against “strategic lawsuits against public participation.” It pauses lawsuits that implicate #freespeech and forces plaintiffs to show they can win the case near the outset with limited discovery. And the move has teeth: if the plaintiff loses, they're on the hook for the studio's attorneys' fees. The thing is, an anti-SLAPP motion is a useful tool to deter abusive lawsuits against anyone speaking out on matters of public interest. But in idea theft cases, it's kind of helping Goliath fight David. Studios have argued, for instance, that developing, casting, and broadcasting a TV show is a "conduct in furtherance" of "free speech in connection with a public issue." Recent California appeals courts decisions have bolstered the anti-SLAPP maneuver, and attorneys told me it's made them wary of picking up idea theft cases. “I’m much more careful with the theft of idea case, because (a) you need discovery, and (b) you’ve got to deal with the SLAPP and you’ve got to deal with the appeal,”?Douglas Johnson, of #BeverlyHills-based Johnson & Johnson LLP, said. “You’re looking at a lot of time and money and not clear on which way the wind’s going to blow.” Thank you Dan Lifschitz, Kevin Gamarnik, David Grossman, Glen Kulik, Douglas Johnson, Brendan Begley, Erica Van Loon, and David Fink for your insights! Here's the full story for Bloomberg Law:

相似主页

查看职位