FreightValidate ? > ?

My Sunday Morning Sermon Can we just be honest with each other for a minute? Fraudulent activity in the Freight industry is not getting any better- it is actually much worse than it was just a year ago Maybe, just Maybe some of the “Anti-Fraud” Vetting Platforms Are Part of the Problem Here’s some food for thought: Over the past couple of years, carrier vetting platforms relying on subjective data have popped up everywhere, claiming to protect the freight industry from scams. But reports indicate that freight fraud has grown by more than 400% during the same period. Further, too many good carriers continue to be penalized or denied verification by some of these companies due to some arbitrary standard; or by reports that simply are not true- At the same time, bad guys are able to manipulate the system and obtain good grades on some of these platforms That is a consequence of using subjective, hypothetical and predictive data to determine a motor carrier’s fate. To make matters worse none of these other companies nor the FMCSA even properly vet or audit freight Brokers or Freight Forwarders at all ! So, we have to ask: Are these platforms actually fighting fraud, or are they just making the problem worse? Many of these tools were created: ?Without real hands-on freight experience or comprehension of FMCSA regulations ?Using faulty algorithms based on questionable, unreliable or inaccurate FMCSA data ?Relying on superficial metrics like the number of inspections, how long someone has had authority, size of vehicle (under 10,001 lbs) or other subjective criteria And yet, they charge sky-high subscription fees for data that doesn’t actually help avoid fraud. In some cases, these platforms might be scams themselves—profiting off fear while doing little to truly protect carriers, brokers, and shippers. At FreightValidate ? > ? we take a different approach. With more than three decades of real freight experience, we use accurate and objective data. We know the regulations. We rely on manual investigative processes, advanced tools like credit scores, days-to-pay insights, information from Secretary of State, DMV and Federal FOIA offices, and of course facial recognition verification to truly fight fraud at its core. We also audit and verify info contained in FMCSA records for accuracy. We work closely with the agency to help them correct efficiencies. In doing so, FreightValidate ? > ? has become known as the “Unofficial Quality Assurance Department of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration” The question isn’t whether fraud is a problem—the question is whether the tools you’re using are solving it or making it worse Want to stop fraud for real? Check out www.freightvalidate.com. Remember #Veterans and #VeteranOwnedOrganizations always get 50% off monthly and annual fees at FreightValidate ? > ? when they enter VETERAN50 at checkout #FraudPrevention #TrustAndTransparency #ScamFreeSolutions

Why do customers trust Direct Expedite LLC for their expedited and just-in-time freight needs? Here are just five reasons: 1?? We are Verified by FreightValidate ? > ? Our identity and compliance are independently verified by FreightValidate, ensuring transparency and trust. 2?? Commitment to Safety and Security We care about the safety and security of your freight. That’s why we exclusively partner with Freight-Validated carriers who meet the highest standards of compliance and integrity. 3?? Proven Expertise in Expedited Freight With decades of experience, we excel at delivering time-critical shipments with unmatched reliability and precision. 4?? Technology-Driven Efficiency From our Patent Pending quoting system, and real-time tracking to AI-powered tools, we use cutting-edge technology to keep you informed and ensure seamless operations. 5?? Exceptional Customer Support Our bilingual, experienced and dedicated team is here for you 24/7, providing personalized service and proactive solutions to keep your supply chain moving. At Direct Expedite LLC, we don’t just move freight—we deliver trust, safety, and peace of mind. Let’s talk about how we can help with your next shipment! Visit our website at www.directexpress.com or send us an email at [email protected] #FreightIndustry #ExpeditedShipping #FreightValidate #LogisticsLeadership Amanda Wyland Santiago Restrepo Bedoya Aunica Sherwood Alejandra Restrepo Bedoya

#BrokerTransparency How Will the FMCSA Enforce This Proposed Rule—and the Regulations Already on the Books? The FMCSA’s proposed updates to 49 CFR § 371.3 aim to improve transparency in brokered freight transactions. This post is #NotADebate about the need for transparency—it’s about enforcement. How will the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ensure this rule, along with others already on the books, is actually enforced? What the Proposed Rule Says The FMCSA’s changes would: 1. Require brokers to provide carriers with transaction records within 48 hours of a written request. These records must detail: ? The amount paid by the shipper. ? The amount retained by the broker. 2. Prohibit brokers from including contract terms that force carriers to waive their right to access these records. 3. Require brokers to maintain records electronically and provide carriers access without restrictive conditions like non-disclosure agreements. While these changes could increase fairness, the #FMCSA’s ability to enforce them remains in question. The Real Issue: #Enforcement Even if this rule becomes final, will the FMCSA enforce it? The Agency’s track record raises concerns: ? The FMCSA contends that in the 2019 Riojas case, an Administrative Law Judge ruled that the FMCSA lacks authority to impose civil penalties in certain cases, significantly weakening its ability to hold violators accountable. ? Nearly 97% of motor carriers still operate without a safety rating, leaving major gaps in oversight. ? The FMCSA has a history of allowing 200 companies per month to register using post office boxes or virtual offices, violating 49 CFR § 390.5T, which requires a legitimate principal place of business. ? Under Public Law 112-141 (MAP-21), brokers must meet training and experience requirements (this regulation has not been enforced since its inception over a decade ago), and all regulated entities must disclose affiliations with other companies. Yet nearly 10,000 companies fail to disclose affiliations, and there’s minimal enforcement. Accountability? This isn’t about choosing sides between OOIDA and TIA (Transportation Intermediaries Association) or debating the merits of transparency in brokered transactions. The real question is whether the FMCSA has the tools and commitment to enforce the rules it creates. Without enforcement, this proposal risks becoming another unenforced regulation, leaving carriers and shippers vulnerable to fraud, double brokering, and hidden fees. Your Turn: ? How should the FMCSA address enforcement gaps, including the limitations highlighted by the Riojas case? ? What changes are needed to ensure compliance and accountability for this rule and others already in place? Until we appoint a #Leader at FMCSA that can get things done and really cares about enforcement and the good of the industry does any of this really matter? Drop your thoughts and ideas below! ?? FreightValidate ? > ?