Who’s not surprised by Kt’s list of what’s not working in community development? This crew. FLOWLab? has spent the last few years beta testing what works, keeping it small, human, and personal. Want to know more? AMA.
Disrupting the status bro through startups, community & brand. Former founder turned VC. Future ghost.
Have you seen The Verge's community research report? Because it's been swirling in my brain for a couple of weeks...especially around what community looks like for founders. Looking at the past 5 years or so, here's what I see en masse: ?? Content is table stakes, not the differentiator. There's a lot of the same, and not enough perspective rooted in practice and not podcasts. ?? Many programs come with price tags and/or rigid timing that don't work for most of the founders who could benefit. ?? Size isn't it. Who benefits from collecting the most founders signed up? (Not founders, who need meaningful connections and actual opportunities) But I'm more interested in what would work vs what isn't. So here's your moment to do something about it. Founders, what is *actually* meaningful to you when it comes to community? What is missing and what do you want more of? https://lnkd.in/g7MPfss7