Congratulations to our lawyers who are recognized in the 2025 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory! https://www.lexpert.ca/
关于我们
The Environmental Law Network (ELN) is the first environmental law firm network that makes local representation available nationwide. Through ELN, more than 250 environmental attorneys share ideas, information, experiences, and contacts to increase the value of legal representation for their respective clients. ELN also has foreign affiliates in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Italy, Mexico, the United Kingdom and Spain. Leaders in each of the member firms average more than 20 years of experience in the field. Chambers Global, The World’s Leading Business Lawyers (2019 Edition) recognized the Environmental Law Network as a Band One Environmental Legal Network. ELN was the only environmental law network to be globally recognized in Chambers. .
- 网站
-
https://elnonline.com/
Environmental Law Network的外部链接
- 所属行业
- 法律服务
- 规模
- 11-50 人
- 总部
- Cleveland，Ohio
- 类型
- 合营企业
地点
-
主要
获取路线
812 Huron Rd
Suite 650
US，Ohio，Cleveland，44115
Environmental Law Network员工
动态
-
Mediator | Environmental Law Specialist │ Contaminated Land │ Environmental Transactions │ Environmental Compliance | Environmental Lawsuits │ Environmental Order and Approval Appeals │ Defend Environmental Prosecutions
I am very pleased to announce the launch of Marc McAree Mediation! #mediation
-
-
Congratulations to our partner Marc McAree for once again being selected for inclusion in the 2025 Lexpert's Leading 500 Cross-Border Lawyers: A Guide to Doing Business in Canada! https://lnkd.in/gkMuEMPj
-
-
Nijman Franzetti LLP Celebrates Multiple Honors in the 2025 Best Lawyers in America? and 2025 Best Law Firms in America? Rankings Including Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law. Read the recognition on our blog below. https://lnkd.in/eHkfRJp2
-
ELN Firm, McGregor Legere & Stevens PC's Annual Update of Environmental Law 2024 Presentation is Now Available. https://lnkd.in/e7yQvwZt
-
Lewis, Longman & Walker is set to host ELN's Annual Meeting in St. Petersburg, Florida November 7-8, 2024. For a lineup of presentation topics and speakers, click the link below: https://lnkd.in/evG4k4NP
-
-
???????? ???? ???????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???? ???????????? ????????, ???????? ???????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ???? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ?????????? ???? ?? ???????????? ???? ?????? ????????’?? ?????????????? ?????????????? ???? ???????????? ?????? ????????, ?????? ???????? ?????????????????? ??????????, ?????????????? & ????????????, ??.??. ???? ???????????????? ?????????? ???????????? ???? ???????? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ???????????????? ?????? ?????????????? ???? ???? ????????’?? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????????????????????? ?????? ?????? ??????????????????. https://buff.ly/46M6B8r
-
-
On 28 March, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its long-awaited first final risk management rule under the Toxic Substances Control Acta (TSCA), banning the import and eventual use of chrysotile asbestos. This is the only form of asbestos known to be used in the US. You may be thinking now that because your company does not import or use asbestos, this does not affect you. You should care about it because the EPA’s approach to the risk management of chrysotile asbestos has much broader implications. This article explains why. https://lnkd.in/eZ89EDZQ
-
PFOS and PFOA Are Now Officially CERCLA Hazardous Substances! In case you missed the flurry of recent law firm and consultant newsletters, internet postings and webinars, EPA’s CERCLA Section 102 designation of PFOS and PFOA as CERCLA hazardous substances became effective last Monday, July 8,?2024. It is either the end of the world, a logical progression or something in between. The hazardous substance designation gives EPA CERCLA enforcement authority to issue orders to require remedial investigations and remediation actions to address releases and threatened releases of PFOS and PFOA. Natural resource trustees can now seek?claims for costs and natural resource damages due to PFOS and PFOA.?PRPs can seek contribution under CERCLA to recover response costs incurred as a result of PFOS and PFOA. Further, the consideration of the presence or likely presence of PFOS and PFOA will now be within the scope of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Finally, any release of PFOS or PFOA within 24-hours great than their reportable quantity must be immediately reported to the National Response Center.? The consequences of the designation may be messy and will take time and litigation to sort out. The practical impact of?EPA’s proposed PFOS and PFOA Enforcement Discretion Policy is yet to be determined.?One interesting challenge for many of the above post designation outcomes is that PFOS and PFOA are rarely present without other PFAS which have not yet been designated. There are circumstances where PFOS and PFOA may not be present or the dominant PFAS. How regulators, private parties and the court address such mixed presence conditions will be interesting to watch. Litigation has started. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and two other trade groups have challenged the hazardous substance designation at the DC Circuit.??Stay tuned. #CERCLA #PFAS #PFOS #PFOA #hazardoussubstance #designation
-
Read about OEHHA proposed changes to Prop 65 Short Form Warnings written by E. Lynn Grayson. https://lnkd.in/gXg-zfH6