Dynamis LLP

Representative Matt Gaetz is obviously going to be a controversial nominee for Attorney General. Dynamis LLP provides an overview of his positions on two topics near and dear to the hearts of many Americans: crypto and cannabis. For those on the left, Gaetz could be the most pro-cannabis Attorney General ever, as he has worked to decriminalize marijuana on the federal level (often the only Republican to do so). For those who support crypto, Gaetz could hardly be better. Read all about it on our blog! https://lnkd.in/e6kptGmU #GaetzNominee #AttorneyGeneral #Crypto #Cannabis #Gaetz

Eric Rosen and Constantine P. Economides, partners at?Dynamis?in its Miami and New York offices, and Christine M. Mackintosh, a partner at?Grant & Eisenhofer?in Wilmington, Delaware, said aspects of the case in which they represent Jonathan Chitty and Conor Stapleton, against Tides.Network Inc., operating as Portal, are similar to macroeconomic components across the crypto industry. “There is this emerging, valuable technology ecosystem and developing Web3 industry that developed outside of any clear regulatory structure, and that leaves ambiguity in the protections that exist for other financial products, like currencies, investments, whatever you want to term it,” Economides said. “That is one relevant component here and that is industry-wide.” Founded in 2018 and headquartered in San Francisco, Portal is a financial services company that provides its users a platform to trade Bitcoin and other crypto assets anywhere in the world. In 2021, Portal raised $31 million through convertible promissory notes, promising repayment or conversion into equity if the company achieved a specified financing level by 2022, per the complaint. However, when crypto markets crashed and Portal’s financial health deteriorated, it allegedly failed to conduct the qualifying $10 million financing needed to convert the notes to equity. Instead, the plaintiffs alleged in the complaint that Portal attempted to pressure noteholders into accepting “worthless” shares, citing a purported conversion based on limited investor consent. The plaintiffs argued that Portal misled investors about their rights, repeatedly insisting via email that noteholders had no repayment right despite clear contractual terms guaranteeing it. When investors questioned the process, Portal declined to provide proof of majority approval for the conversion and, instead, threatened legal action against those who asked questions, according to the complaint. Plaintiffs also alleged that Portal’s financial statements, shared in mid-2022, failed to account for the $31 million raised, casting doubt on where the funds went. Meanwhile, Portal reportedly completed a $34 million fundraising round in 2024, raising concerns that investors’ initial contributions may have been redirected. Full story from Michael A. Mora: https://lnkd.in/eKPjHn5x (Constantine Economides, left, and Eric Rosen, right, of Dynamis.)