“How much more evidence do we need before this becomes standard practice?” Alexander Sundermann, DrPH, CIC, FAPIC we often wonder the same thing. We find that there is no substitute for genomic data to help infection control figure what is really happening. If you are an IP&C and need help figuring out an outbreak, let us know. We have a variety of ways to deploy sequencing and our epixact pipeline to help hospitals get outbreaks under control.
There’s a great new preprint from the team at Copenhagen University Hospital on the utility of genomic surveillance for #InfectionPrevention: ?? Over 28 months, they sequenced isolates from 7,760 patient infections and found that 27.1% were genetically related—meaning they were part of an outbreak. This is all undetected transmission through current IP&C methods!! ?? Using geo-temporal thresholds, they identified epidemiological links in 69% of cases, further supporting the role of transmission within the hospital. ?? Importantly, they modeled the financial impact and found that proactive IP&C interventions based on genomic surveillance could result in €1.25 million in net savings per year. This adds to the growing body of evidence showing that WGS-informed surveillance consistently uncovers transmission at levels traditional methods miss. Despite this, it remains underutilized in infection prevention programs. ?? How much more evidence do we need before it becomes standard practice? ?? Pre-print linked here, and below: https://lnkd.in/ezyUAZPC