The Conversation U.S.的封面图片
The Conversation U.S.

The Conversation U.S.

在线音视频媒体

Boston,Massachusetts 11,351 位关注者

A nonprofit news organization dedicated to unlocking knowledge and expertise from academia for the public.

关于我们

We publish trustworthy and informative articles written by academic experts for the general public and edited by our team of journalists. On our website (and through distribution of our articles to thousands of news outlets worldwide), you’ll find explanatory journalism on the events, discoveries and issues that matter today. Our articles share researchers’ expertise in policy, science, health, economics, education, history, ethics and most every subject studied in colleges and universities. Some articles offer practical advice grounded in research, while others simply provide authoritative answers to questions that sparked our curiosity. The Conversation began in Melbourne, Australia, in March 2011, created and founded by Andrew Jaspan with the support of business strategist Jack Rejtman and the University of Melbourne Vice-Chancellor Glyn Davis. Global expansion brought it to the U.S. in 2014. The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation U.S. seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone.

网站
https://theconversation.com/us
所属行业
在线音视频媒体
规模
11-50 人
总部
Boston,Massachusetts
类型
非营利机构
创立
2014
领域
journalism、science和news

地点

The Conversation U.S.员工

动态

  • Or for a glass half-full view, the US government used to account for 2/3 of scientific research grants #research #researchfunding

    查看The Chronicle of Philanthropy的组织主页

    106,135 位关注者

    The $30 billion that foundations give to support scientific and health research may equal as much as half of what the U.S. government distributes annually for those causes. https://lnkd.in/efNCDpjN This article is part of a partnership the Chronicle has forged with The Conversation U.S. and The Associated Press to expand coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits.

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • Bottlenose dolphins in Sarasota Bay in Florida and Barataria Bay in Louisiana are exhaling microplastic fibers. Tiny plastic pieces have spread all over the planet –?on land,?in the air?and even?in clouds. An?estimated 170 trillion bits of microplastic?are estimated to be in the oceans alone. Microplastic particles exhaled by bottlenose dolphins are similar in chemical composition to those?identified in human lungs. Whether dolphins are exposed to more of these pollutants than people are is not yet known. In humans, inhaled microplastics can cause?lung inflammation, which can lead to problems including?tissue damage, excess mucus, pneumonia, bronchitis, scarring and possibly cancer. Since dolphins and humans inhale similar plastic particles, dolphins may be at risk for the same lung problems. As?top predators with decades-long life spans, bottlenose dolphins help scientists understand the impacts of pollutants on marine ecosystems – and the related health risks for people living near coasts. This research is important because?more than 41% of the world’s human population?lives within 62 miles (100 km) of a coast. - Leslie (Burdett) Hart, Associate Professor of Public Health, College of Charleston - Miranda Dziobak Instructor in Public Health, College of Charleston Collaborators: Brookfield Zoo Chicago Hope Research Lab Sarasota Dolphin Research College of Charleston School of Health Sciences National Marine Mammal Foundation The Citadel Foundacion Oceanografic Douglas Austin

  • #NationalLeadershipDay, which takes place every Feb. 20, offers a chance to reflect on what truly defines leadership – not just strategy or decision-making, but the ability to build trust. Fortunately for managers – and workers – there’s a lot of research into how to be a more trustworthy leader. Here are a few insights: ? Empower your team. Let employees take ownership of their responsibilities and make decisions within their roles. This not only boosts their engagement but also aligns their objectives with the broader goals of the organization. Empowerment is a key strategy in building trust. ? Be fair and transparent. Managers should strive to be consistent in their actions, address concerns promptly and distribute rewards equitably. Those practices can create a psychologically safe and supportive work environment. ? Promote collaboration. Encourage an atmosphere in which employees can openly share ideas and support one another. Activities that promote team cohesion and open communication can significantly enhance trust within the team. ? Measure and manage trust. Implementing regular surveys or feedback sessions can help assess and manage trust levels within an organization. Consider integrating trust metrics into performance evaluations to emphasize their importance.” Yufei Ren, Associate Professor of Economics, Labovitz School of Business and Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth Now it's your turn: What qualities define a great leader? #leadership #trust

  • “Information on the internet might seem like it’s there forever, but it’s only as permanent as people choose to make it. That’s apparent as the second Trump administration ‘floods the zone’ with efforts to dismantle science agencies and the data and websites they use to communicate with the public. The Public Environmental Data Partners, a coalition of nonprofits, archivists and researchers who rely on federal data, are working to ensure that data remains available to the public. In just the first three weeks of Trump’s term, agencies removed access to at least a dozen climate and environmental justice analysis tools. The new administration also scrubbed the phrase ‘#climatechange’ from government websites, as well as terms like ‘resilience’. Groups have been archiving climate datasets our community has prioritized, uploading copies to public repositories and cataloging where and how to find them if they go missing from government websites. The End of Term Web Archive team has captured snapshots of millions of government webpages and made them accessible through the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. The group has done this after each administration since 2008. If you’re looking at a webpage and you think it should include a discussion of climate change, use the ‘changes’ tool“ in the Wayback Machine to check if the language has been altered over time, or navigate to the site’s snapshots of the page before Trump’s inauguration. While data archiving efforts can stem the tide of removals to some extent, there is no replacement for the government research infrastructures that produce and share climate data.” Eric Nost, University of Guelph and Alejandro Paz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Read the story: https://lnkd.in/e_eFhfXT

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • “Because of the Trump administration’s efforts to cut staff and spending, Congress’ “power of the purse” has been in the news lately. Many of these actions have been challenged in court. I’m a law professor who has written about Congress’ power of the purse and some of the legal and constitutional issues that surround it. Here’s a brief explanation of the concept – and of why you should care about it. Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress holds what’s commonly called the “power of the purse.” Congress, in other words, holds the authority to control government expenditures. Although the Constitution forbids any appropriation for the Army that lasts longer than two years, Congress can choose in other contexts whether to provide an appropriation permanently or only for a prescribed length of time. James Madison, the fourth president and a leading figure in the Constitutional Convention, wrote in the Federalist Papers that the power of the purse was “the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people, for obtaining a redress of every grievance, and for carrying into effect every just and salutary measure.” This sort of leverage over policy still matters. Annual appropriations also give rise to the frustrating phenomenon of government “shutdowns”: If annual funding runs out before Congress enacts new appropriations, government agencies generally must halt operations. On the whole, however, annual appropriations continue to serve much the same purpose in the United States that they did in Britain: They provide a potent check on the executive branch. Trump may be hoping that Congress will cure any legal problems by ratifying these actions after the fact in its next round of appropriations legislation. But if Trump is indeed defying Congress’ spending laws and yet faces no consequences, his actions could chip away at Congress’ authority to check presidential policies in the future through its spending choices. James Madison would not have been pleased." — Zachary Price, University of California, College of the Law, San Francisco (formerly UC Hastings)

    • 该图片无替代文字
  • When people think of wildlife trade, they often picture smugglers sneaking in rare and endangered species from far-off countries. Yet most wildlife trade is actually legal, and the United States is one of the world’s biggest wildlife importers. Over the last 22 years, people in the U.S. legally imported nearly 2.85 billion individual animals from almost 30,000 species. Some of these wild animals become pets, such as reptiles, spiders, clownfish, chimpanzees and even tigers. Thousands end up in zoos and aquariums, where many species on display come directly from the wild. Medical research uses macaque monkeys and imports up to 39,000 of them every year. The fashion trade imports around 1 million to 2 million crocodile skins every year. Hunting trophies are also included in wildlife. Species that aren’t native to the U.S. may also escape or be released into the wild. Invasive species can cause billions of dollars in damage by consuming and outcompeting native wildlife and spreading diseases. E-commerce platforms such as Etsy and Instagram have become hotspots of wildlife trade and can be challenging to monitor, although Etsy announced in 2024 that it would remove listings of endangered or threatened species.? Story: https://lnkd.in/eyv8WakP #wildlife #birds #reptiles #mammals Photo: Macaques, used in medical research, are the most-traded primates globally, according to an analysis of U.S. Fish and Wildlife data.?Davidvraju,?CC BY-SA

    • Macaques, used in medical research, are the most-traded primates globally, according to an analysis of U.S. Fish and Wildlife data. Davidvraju, CC BY-SA

相似主页

查看职位