Clarity in Science Editing and Writing

If you just switched to Daylight Saving Time, you just lost an hour. Wouldn’t you like to get that time back? You don’t need to struggle with language or writing to benefit from using our company! I wrote a whole blog about that, which you can read here. https://lnkd.in/dQXKhb9b Maybe you are just busy, and could use some help getting a project or two finished. There are two services we offer that can really help you to achieve your publication goals: manuscript editing and technical writing. Our manuscript editing service https://lnkd.in/dQXKhb9b is perfect for when you have a full-length draft of a manuscript, but it is not ready for submission yet. Perhaps you have a trainee who is not a native speaker, and that person has written a draft for you. The language needs to be fixed before you can begin to tackle the content, but it is a lot of work, so you have been putting it off. Let us help! We will provide a thorough, premium edit and format the manuscript for the journal of your choice, so it is ready for submission. The cost is quite reasonable: only $100/1000 words, which is much less than other services charge for a premium edit. If you have a manuscript that is not complete, let us finish it for you by using our technical writing service. https://lnkd.in/dHdF53YU As long as you have the figures complete (and the methods), we can do the rest for you, providing you with a publication-ready manuscript in a very short time. Just answer a few questions about each figure, and we will do the rest. There is no authorship obligation, either. Just acknowledge our company in the publication. The charge for this service is quite modest as well: only $100/hour, with most manuscripts taking between 5 and 20 hours, depending on length and how much you have written already. Have questions, or want to know more? Reach out to us today via email at [email protected], or by phone at (713) 489-3572. You will be glad you did.

Consider our Technical Writing service to complete that manuscript! I remember the frustration. A trainee leaves the lab without finishing the paper. I would try to reach out, thinking that he or she would be motivated to get another publication from the time with me. But maybe that person moved on to clinical training and just had no time to work on writing. Or perhaps he or she was simply too busy with the new position to wrap things up. Whatever the reason, I was left with a pile of good data, usually already put into good figures, but no manuscript to submit, and I was having trouble finding the time myself to write it all up. We can help. In fact, it was for exactly this situation that I created our Technical Writing service (https://lnkd.in/dHuFKFf4). Check it out!

Give yourself a present this holiday season! The holidays are upon us, and the year is almost over. Wouldn’t it be nice to get one more publication submitted before the New Year? With help from Clarity in Science Editing and Writing, you can! Most of us have a manuscript or two that has been sitting on the desk for too long, waiting for us to revise the trainee’s less-than-stellar language. Check out our manuscript services (https://lnkd.in/dYU34gyx). We can have that paper ready to submit with the best, most professional language within a week, formatted for the journal of your choice. Wouldn’t that be a great way to finish out the year? Maybe the manuscript you are thinking of isn’t fully written. No problem. Check out our technical writing services (https://lnkd.in/dHdF53YU). If you have made the figures, just answer a few simple questions, and our expert writers will complete the introduction, results, and discussion for you. And it’s completely ethical to use our service, as I discussed in my blog (https://lnkd.in/eMQTPNb5). So, go ahead. Give yourself the gift of one more publication this year. You will be glad you did.

You don't have to struggle with language to use an editing and writing company! Many of our biggest clients are actually fantastic writers. They just needed some help getting things done, because they are short on time. So, I wrote a post about it on the company website: https://lnkd.in/dQXKhb9b. Take a look, and consider whether you might benefit from having us edit your manuscript (https://lnkd.in/dYU34gyx), or even write it for you ethically (https://lnkd.in/dHdF53YU). We're here to help, and think you will be glad you did.

It’s OK to get some help. We’ve reached October, and there are only three months to go before the end of the year. Do you have manuscripts, yours or from your trainees or colleagues, sitting on your desk that you can’t seem to find time to edit and get ready for submission? Data figures waiting to be written up? We’re here to help! Check out the Clarity in Science Editing and Writing website (www.clarityinscience.com) to see our #ManucriptEditing and #TechnicalWriting services. For a very affordable price, we can get your manuscript ready for submission in about a week. Worried about the ethics of using a technical writer for your publication? Read our blog on the subject – there are no worries when you use our service and provide proper acknowledgements in the manuscript. Email or call us today to discuss your project. You will be glad you did.

Clarity in Science Editing and Writing is looking for grant reviewers! Have you ever been funded by the NIH, ACS, or a similar organization? Have you ever served on a study section? Would you like to earn some extra money while seeing and evaluating cutting-edge science in your field? Clarity in Science Editing and Writing is looking for additional grant reviewers to expand our popular service: Pre-submission grant reviews. We provide a thorough language edit together with a review of the scientific rationale, experimental design, logic, and flow of proposals prior to investigators submitting them for funding from the NIH, ACS, or other agencies. You complete the work on your own schedule, returning the edited document to us within 5-7 days. You will be paid $50/hour for your time, and most proposals take between 6 and 15 hours to complete. Sound interesting? Check out our website (https://lnkd.in/dmny6nUu) to learn more (scroll down on the page for the grant reviewer section).?

Truly honored to be recognized by #LifeSciencesReview for our outstanding services to scientists and academic physicians seeking to be published or get their grants funded.

Clarity in Science Editing and Writing has been named a Top Medical Writing Services Provider for 2024 by #LifeSciencesReview magazine! We are truly honored and humbled to have this recognition of the unique professional services that we provide to our customers. You can read their whole write up about the company at https://lnkd.in/dXrrU3cm. As one of the only companies that features editors who are all published PhDs and native English speakers, we bring a level of experience and skill that is unparalleled among editing services providers. What makes it even more impressive is that you can obtain our scientific manuscript editing, technical writing, pre-submission grant review, and graphics services for such competitive rates, with most projects completed in a week or less. We are pleased that the outstanding service we provide is being recognized. Visit our website (clarityinscience.com) or contact us today at [email protected] to see how our services can help you with your projects. We look forward to hearing from you. #ScientificManuscriptEditing, #TechnicalWriting, #GrantReviews

Clarity in Science Editing and Writing is looking for grant reviewers! Have you ever been funded by the NIH, ACS, or a similar organization? Have you ever served on a study section? Would you like to earn some extra money while seeing and evaluating cutting-edge science in your field? Clarity in Science Editing and Writing is looking for additional grant reviewers to expand our popular service: Pre-submission grant reviews. We provide a thorough language edit together with a review of the scientific rationale, experimental design, logic, and flow of proposals prior to investigators submitting them for funding from the NIH, ACS, or other agencies. You complete the work on your own schedule, returning the edited document to us within 5-7 days. You will be paid $50/hour for your time, and most proposals take between 6 and 15 hours to complete. Sound interesting? Check out our website (https://lnkd.in/dmny6nUu) to learn more (scroll down on the page for the grant reviewer section).?

Consider the advantages of a pre-submission grant review #Grants Originally posted here: https://lnkd.in/egsdJfXP When I was running my research laboratory, one of the biggest responsibilities I had once I had received my first R01, in terms of importance, rather than time, was serving on study sections. We all know how important funding is to a scientific career, and it is fair to say that there is never enough money to go around. The current success rate for NIH R01 proposals is just slightly more than 21%, which means that many good projects go unfunded. Most of the proposals that do get chosen are only selected after resubmission. These stark numbers highlight just how important it is to put the best possible submission in on the first round, and to make sure that the resubmission is fully responsive to the critiques received. That is why I started providing pre-submission grants reviews as a service here at Clarity in Science Editing and Writing. I recently completed a review for a client who really did everything the right way. He reached out to me some months ago, asking me to review his specific aims page, so that I could provide guidance on the overall direction of the project. He then took the time to generate high-quality preliminary data, a sound hypothesis, and to refine the aims and technical approach. This month, he sent me the full proposal to review. He really did not need much help with language, and I did not have to revise the text all that much. In fact, the language was so good that the whole review took much less time than usual – only about 6 hours. (I usually tell clients to expect 8-12 hours for a thorough review.) But I did highlight some important things he had overlooked that could have had an adverse impact on his priority score, and asked why he didn’t propose a specific experiment that seemed logical to me. It turned out that he had already done the experiment, but the results were negative – no impact on the factors the study assesses – so he did not include the assay in the proposal. I recommended presenting the preliminary data anyway, citing that as the reason why the technique is not going to be used in the proposed experiments. I believe that the suggestions and revisions will make the proposal stronger, and much more likely to get a good priority score. If you are working on a grant proposal, consider sending it to Clarity in Science Editing and Writing for a pre-submission review to give your grant the best chance at getting a good priority score. You will be glad you did. And if you are already a funded investigator who has served on study sections and would like to earn a little extra money by reviewing grants, please apply to be a freelance grant reviewer. I would be glad to have your assistance and expertise.