The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development recently released their updated Operating Cost Adjustment Factors (OCAFs). If you aren’t familiar, OCAFs are way that HUD administratively determines how much to increase project-based Section 8 subsidy amounts.
For projects that have converted under RAD, your annual OCAF increase (calculated at the state-level) can sometimes be the only increase in funding you’ll see year over year, so making sure the numbers reflect reality is a hugely important exercise.
I was curious so I put together a few quick graphics looking at this year’s OCAF compared the FY24. A majority of states saw a decrease in their OCAF, but the changes varied across the country.
HUD also announced an important change to their methodology this year, switching to actual property data instead of relying on indices to capture insurance costs. The indices were national and missed regional variation.
In my opinion, this is a positive move. One of the common complaints about OCAF is that by virtue of being a broad, composite number, it ignores differences in the cost to operate properties within a state. Say, for example, the cost differences between New York City and the balance of New York State.
It would be interesting to see HUD rely more on property data in the future, and not just in the Section 8 portfolio. With better data collection and capacity, HUD could probably calculate and process budget-based rent increases for 202 and 811 properties without needing the properties to request increases. Some lower-capacity owners may go years without requesting an increase!
Read more here: https://lnkd.in/esBy6WPK