Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

As we celebrate Women’s History Month, we honor the women who have shaped the legal profession through education, mentorship, and leadership. This year’s theme, “Moving Forward Together! Women Educating & Inspiring Generations,” recognizes the collective strength of those who have dedicated their careers to empowering others. At Bradley, we’re proud to support the growth of our female attorneys through the Winn Initiative. Established nearly 20 years ago, the program champions leadership, mentorship, and career development. Named in honor of Ellene Winn, a Bradley attorney who became one of the first female partners in a Southeastern law firm, the initiative builds on her legacy and continues to break barriers. This month, we’ll spotlight some of our female attorneys sharing their insights on mentorship, career growth, and empowering other women in law. Stay tuned to hear their stories and celebrate the impact of women in law. https://lnkd.in/e3nW8cs8 #WomensHistoryMonth #BradleyWomen #BradleyDiversity

Explore the February 2025 edition of our “In Case You Missed It” newsletter! Dive into insightful blog posts authored by our attorneys over the past month. Whether you’re revisiting favorites or discovering new insights, stay informed by subscribing to our newsletter today. Subscribe on LinkedIn: [https://bit.ly/41MR6KG]

The first few weeks of the new administration have seen significant changes to labor and employment policies. Keith Anderson and Matthew Lonergan provide an overview of key developments, including changes to diversity policies, federal employee protections, and collective bargaining agreements. Read more in the latest edition of Bradley's Labor & Employment Newsletter: [https://lnkd.in/dn989grH]

Shae Armstrong and Paul Patton discuss the limits of executive power in altering the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. Recent proposals to replace the program highlight the need for congressional action, not executive orders. Learn more about why these changes can’t happen unilaterally. [https://lnkd.in/e3PxFydN]

Amy S. Leopard and Adriante Carter explore the justifications behind the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' proposed updates to the HIPAA Security Rule. These changes aim to address rising cybersecurity risks and the evolving healthcare landscape. The blog delves into the reasons for the updates and the challenges faced by regulated entities. Read more on Online & On Point for insights on the future of healthcare cybersecurity. [https://lnkd.in/eqRq2aD3]

Hillary Campbell and Anne Yuengert explore how recent shifts at the FTC could impact noncompete agreements. With new leadership in place, the future of the Noncompete Rule remains uncertain. Stay informed on these developments in Bradley's Labor & Employment Insights blog. Read more here: [https://lnkd.in/dr6Qsxcq]

Monica Wilson Dozier recently shared insights with Construction Dive on how contractors can navigate tariff-related challenges in the construction industry. She discussed the importance of force majeure clauses, the impact of tariff changes on contract terms, strategies for negotiating cost adjustments, and the advantages of cost-plus contracts in managing material price fluctuations. Read more to learn how contractors can safeguard their projects in the face of tariff uncertainties. [https://lnkd.in/ebrV2_6X]

Whitt Steineker reflects on the progress of Alabama's medical cannabis program, now four years in. From initial promise to ongoing legal challenges, this post assesses where the program stands and what lies ahead. Read more on Bradley’s Budding Trends blog: [https://lnkd.in/eWJPHyG6]

Sydney Marie Warren will be presenting at the Construction Law Foundation of Texas 38th Annual Construction Law Conference on March 6, 2025. The session will examine the interplay between arbitration and jurisdiction in construction contracts, providing key insights on navigating these complexities. For more information, visit: [https://bit.ly/41g6d0v]

Can calling a contractor a "crook" or "con man" be considered defamation? A federal court in Ohio ruled that while some statements, like name-calling, are protected opinions, others—such as accusations of falsifying evidence—could have legal consequences. In this post on the BuildSmart blog, John Mark Goodman breaks down the court’s reasoning, the distinction between opinion and defamation, and the implications for construction disputes. Learn more: [https://lnkd.in/es34Bixq]