From technology-centric to outcome-centric: The next stage for automotive OEMs
The automotive industry has pledged over $500 Billion to achieve the Connected, Autonomous, Electric and Software-Defined Vehicle. In a recent video , I explored why many of these programs are increasingly delayed, struggle to resonate with users, and often do not deliver the value to OEMs that was originally promised. Ultimately, we’re at risk as an industry of making technology the primary goal, rather than a means of delivering better consumer and commercial outcomes.
Re-focusing on Outcomes
Despite all of the excitement around these technologies, the greatest products—both in and out of the automotive industry—tend to be created by companies with outcome-centric priorities. These companies stand out because they do not integrate technology for its own sake. They harness it to achieve specific, user-focused outcomes.
Outcome-centric companies prioritize the end goals, whether that be safety, efficiency, accessibility, sustainability. Their products resonate deeply with users because they are designed to solve real problems and enhance quality of life. They understand that technology should not overshadow the product's purpose but should instead enable and enhance the product's ability to meet its intended goals. It is this clear vision that has historically separated truly transformative products from the rest. Watch the first 10 seconds of this recent video from Volvo Group , and see how clearly they put technology in the right place:
As the automotive industry continues to evolve at a breakneck pace, it's vital that we assess whether we are allowing technology to lead us astray from our primary objectives. It's time to look beyond the silicon and circuits and refocus on the tangible outcomes that define the value and success of automotive products.
So, how can you tell whether you’re working at (or partnering with) an outcome-centric OEM?
The focus of a company significantly influences its products, its culture, and ultimately, its success. Two prevailing paradigms exist: technology-centric and outcome-centric. While the former can lead to short-term gains, it's is the latter that focuses on long-term value. Here are five signs for each that can help you determine the kind of OEM you work for.
领英推荐
Outcome-Centric Automotive OEMs
Technology-Centric Automotive OEMs
This isn't just about observing product offerings—it's about understanding the core values that drive decision-making and strategy. Outcome-centric OEMs, while rare, are able to provide a more balanced, sustainable, and ultimately successful approach to mobility that benefits customers, society, and shareholders alike.
By aiming for Outcome-Defined Vehicles, designed to achieve outcome-centric goals, built from the 4S pillars (Safe, Secure, Seamless, and Sustainable) that make mobility acceptable to users and society, OEMs get a framework through which they can make clear, outcome-centric decisions, and returns technology to being the enabler rather than the goal.
Senior Manager, Data & AI applications
6 个月Just some opinion: I remember reading a very exhaustive SBD report on SDV two years back and it said “… a technology (HW and SW) overhaul is necessary”. Comparing the evolution of SDVs to what happened in PC(personal computing) and mobile (evolution and Android and apps), it still seems that the evolution of Car SW to accommodate features more quickly and easily is definitely needed. We are in middle of this technology transformation and probably it’s taking longer time to reach a plateau. I do agree not lose sight of the “tangible value” that is getting created. But the technology driven-ness will continue until this major overhaul reaches some plateau. Value would come, eventually. Just an analogy: I’m not sure “value” was created on mobile phones when android was getting created or rolled out. Just quoting the same analogy from SBD’s SDV report: the phones we use now (android ones) - is it creating more value to customers than the Nokia ones 15 years back?
Strategic Business Development Manager @ Jurchen Technology GmbH | Ex Markets&Markets | Ex Belectric India | MSc Project Management, ESC Clermont Ferrand.
7 个月Well written, Andy. Actually, the trend should shift to User Defined Vehicles, which will lower the financial risk for automakers when introducing or upgrading any feature or technology. This will enable stakeholders to effectively support the four pillars by directing their investments in the correct paths.?