???? ????, ?????? ?????????? ????, "???????? ???????? ???????? ???? ???????? ???????????????? ??????????."
Mike Maples, Jr. was the first person I heard this adage from.
This is true, and LPs should avoid comparing small funds versus mega-platforms, as their unique business models will translate into drastically different risk/return profiles. Think of the VC landscape as a barbell. On one side, smaller funds have a small share of AUM but are significant by number, and Mega-platforms, on the other hand, are small by number but have a large overall share of AUM.
?????? ?????????? ?????????? (<$??????????), ?????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ?????????? ????:
- Generally have only seed/series A exposure
- Equal or majority of the fund exposure is in the initial check (50% or higher)
- Generally need to be very early and/or non-consensus to outperform (Follow-on rates of seed to A are ~30%, so the ones that make it need to be big).
- 25-35 companies, of which <10% will offer potential fund returning status. This leads to higher performance volatility, but an increased top-end return as even 3-5% exit ownership in a single $5B company can return the entire sub-$250MM fund.
?????? ?????????? ??????????????????, ?????? ???????????????? ?????????? ????:
- Business plan is now seed to late growth, often across several product lines.
- Seed is an optionality strategy, focusing mainly on driving pole position when/if the A is reached (also why many large funds invest in seed funds).
- Large generalists can operate a consensus model by focusing on companies/founders with high visibility in becoming/creating category-defining companies and themes/sectors with obvious tailwinds.
- While entry valuations are not entirely irrelevant, ownership and the potential quantum of capital that can be deployed in a single company are critical considerations. A $1.25B early-stage VC fund will have to own 12-20%+ at exit, and the top companies in the portfolio often will have $50MM-$100MM+ invested in them over multiple rounds (cost dollar averaging up per round).
Very few firms can be competitive here, as brand and reputation are absolute prerequisites to operating. From my perspective, only 10-15 firms exist that can be competitive with this strategy.
- Because of this model, top-end returns are somewhat capped and usually returns are within a fairly tight band (Unless the fund has extreme amounts of luck or misfortune), but the trade-off is reduced risk/volatility and often (but not always), a shorter time to liquidity.
Both can be part of an LP's portfolio, depending on the risk/return profile and time availability (finding the right small firms and getting into the top large firms is hard).