To navigate conflicting feedback, I’d first seek clarification from each source to understand their perspective fully. I’d identify common themes and areas of agreement, while acknowledging the differences. By focusing on actionable insights, I’d create a plan to address concerns, showing openness to improvement and aligning with my goals for growth.

If I receive any conflicting feedback on my performance I would first listen to it carefully and will understand why did it happen and what was the main cause of it. After understanding the feedback I will go through each point of action where I was working on and will see whether I missed anything or made any mistake by any chance. If do not find any missed points then I surely will appreciate the person for the feedback that I heard something which I need to work on. If I really made any mistake then I surely will improve the work with a proper plan for future references and will assure the person for the future.

When provided negative feedback, ask for examples of what you could have said differently. If the feedback is genuine, then they should have no problem providing further clarification. If they can't, then then don't put too much faith in what was said.

Customer point of view * Feedback is gold. * Analyze data and information. Break it down. * Positive one motivate and push to improve *Negative inputs shows different expectations or allow to explain. * improvement only done by self evolution, feedback help to set priority. * It is also possible +ve feedback may not hv right data and constructive one add to long term growth. Value all feedback, take it important.

When receiving conflicting feedback, it's important to stay calm and assess each perspective. I would seek clarification on specific points and identify common themes. This helps me understand different viewpoints and focus on areas for improvement. Ultimately, I use the feedback to adapt and grow in my role.