You're navigating bioengineering jargon with non-technical partners. How do you ensure clear communication?

When explaining complex concepts, I use relatable analogies to simplify the message. For instance, I described gene therapy as "delivering a corrected instruction manual to cells" rather than diving into technical jargon. In another instance, I explained glaucoma by comparing it to "a clogged drain in a sink," where fluid buildup increases pressure and damages the eye. These analogies help non-technical stakeholders easily understand and engage with the material, ensuring clear communication.

I used analogies to simplify complex ophthalmology concepts. I described cell replacement therapy for the retina as "replacing faulty pixels in a screen," restoring vision where cells were damaged. I explained age-related macular degeneration (AMD) as "rust forming on metal," with leaky blood vessels acting like a "dripping faucet" that damages the retina. I likened anti-VEGF treatment to "patching a leak," where it stops the abnormal blood flow, preventing further damage. These analogies helped non-technical stakeholders easily understand the science.

For gene therapy, I created diagrams likening the process to "reprogramming software," where faulty genetic code is replaced with corrected instructions. These visuals made the intricate processes behind both conditions and treatments more understandable for non-technical audiences. In my work on cell therapy, I used visual aids to simplify complex concepts. I illustrated the process as "replacing faulty components in a machine," showing how damaged retinal cells are swapped out for healthy ones. Step-by-step flowcharts further clarified the stages of harvesting, preparing, and transplanting cells, ensuring non-technical partners could easily grasp the essential aspects of cell therapy.

In my work on gene therapy, I established common ground by comparing the process to something familiar: "reprogramming software." I explained how faulty genetic code is replaced with corrected instructions, making the concept more relatable and easier for non-technical audiences to understand. Similarly, in cell therapy, I built common ground by likening the process to "replacing faulty components in a machine." By connecting the idea of damaged retinal cells being swapped out for healthy ones to something they already understood, I helped non-technical stakeholders grasp the essential aspects of the therapy. This approach ensured that complex concepts were communicated effectively and clearly.

Regularly recapping and reinforcing key concepts ensures that non-technical partners retain critical information and stay aligned with the project’s scientific aspects over time. While managing a long-term project involving drug delivery systems, I made it a point to revisit and summarise the core scientific concepts at the beginning of each major meeting. This practice helped non-technical stakeholders keep the technical details fresh in their minds, leading to more informed discussions and decisions. By reinforcing key concepts regularly, I ensured that the entire team remained engaged and knowledgeable about the project’s technical aspects. Regular recaps help cement understanding and keep non-technical partners aligned.