You're looking for mobile app testing services. How do you know which one is right for your business?

Mobile app testing is the majority where have to make it our app compatible with all the screen size/ resolution and tab/iPad support. Because in the market many devices , specifically in Andorid with different OS version and to support different libraries etc… Seen many issue in these area where app UI not fit or crashes due to these reasons.

Por outro lado, o teste automatizado utiliza ferramentas de software ou scripts para simular as a??es do usuário e verificar os resultados. Esses testes s?o valiosos para execu??es repetitivas, testes regressivos e detec??o de regress?es, permitindo uma cobertura mais ampla em um curto espa?o de tempo. Além disso, scans automatizados de vulnerabilidades tanto no SDK quanto nas APIs de comunica??o podem ser incorporados nesse processo, garantindo uma abordagem abrangente para identificar potenciais pontos fracos de seguran?a.

Mobile app testing service has a very sharp investment curve if app is a long running project spanning 2+years of incremental releases. In my experience, a testing service should be skilled at Manual testing before release and automating the manual tests post release. Automated test cases have to be written and maintained from the Developer team (XCTest, Espresso) and SDET/ QA team (Appium tests) for critical paths like payments, websocket communication etc. For a first time app release to market, I would recommend going to crowd manual testing like TestIO, TesterWork etc or internal testing channels inside an organization

Testing is always important and should always keep the end user in mind and be sure to test on all mobile platforms. TVOS should also be a platform that gets tested with an eye to how the product will be used in the home.

Mobile app testing is critical considering just how more and more people are using mobiles for their primary tool for accessing the web. - Layered Testing: Developers should unit test functional and communication layers, while the UI layer (usability, internationalization), due to its complexity, benefits from manual testing. - Device Diversity: Manual tests must cover different devices, including phones and tablets, to ensure a consistent user experience. - Performance: Test for latency and responsiveness, aiming for a graceful UX under varied conditions. - Early Integration: Testing should be part of the development strategy from the start, ensuring a robust and user-friendly application.

Manual testing offers a hands-on, exploratory approach that's adept at uncovering unforeseen issues and assessing user experience. It's effective for smaller projects and situations with frequent changes. However, manual testing can be time-consuming, susceptible to human error, and lacks efficiency in repetitive tasks. As projects grow in complexity, scalability becomes a challenge, making automation a more efficient choice for faster feedback and comprehensive regression testing

Manual testing for mobile apps stands as an indispensable tool in the quality assurance process, providing invaluable insights into the user experience that automated testing simply cannot replicate. Its strength lies in the flexibility and intuitive feedback it offers, allowing testers to explore the application in ways that reflect real-world usage. Despite some challenges such as time consumption and potential for human error, the benefits of manual testing are undeniable. It enables a thorough examination of the app under diverse conditions, ensuring that all features function correctly across various devices and platforms. Test Automation for mobile apps comes with high cost and lesser lifespan of test code written as well.

Finding the best mobile app testing service for your company requires considering several aspects while assessing them. Unique benefits of manual testing include cost-effectiveness for smaller projects, human intuition, and flexibility. It enables testers to thoroughly examine the app's features, identifying subtle problems that automated tests could overlook. However, manual testing can be challenging to scale, time-consuming, and prone to human mistakes for more significant projects or regular releases. Determining if manual testing fits your project's goals and commercial demands requires weighing the advantages of human monitoring against the disadvantages of resource intensiveness.

I really don't think manual testing can be completely excluded. It depends on the test coverage and reliability of your automation test suites. It also depends on the release cycle; if it is too frequent, it is always recommended to add most cases to the automation suite as they will be repetitive in each release. Manual testing should cover key areas of the app, depending on the criticality of the feature or the most visited/used feature according to your analytics data.

Vorteile Flexibilit?t: Manuelle Tests k?nnen an jede Situation angepasst werden und sind daher ideal für exploratives Testen und Ad-hoc-Tests. Kreativit?t: Tester k?nnen ihre Intuition und Erfahrung nutzen, um Fehler zu finden, die potentiell nicht durch automatisierte Tests abgedeckt sind. ? Benutzerfreundlichkeit: manuelles Testing erm?glicht h?ufig schon eine erste Beurteilung der Benutzerfreundlichkeit der Software. Nachteile Zeitaufw?ndig: Manuelles Testen kann sehr zeitaufw?ndig sein, insbesondere bei komplexen Systemen. Fehleranf?llig: Menschliche Fehler k?nnen zu ungenauen Testergebnissen führen. Skalierbarkeit: Manuelle Tests sind schwer zu skalieren, wenn die Anzahl der Testf?lle oder die Komplexit?t der Software steigt.

Automatic tests are very good to identify if all the features are working properly, but they also need to be programmed and well done to be valid. So they also will consume time to be implemented and are a good choice when you have to massive test something, like stress tests on server requests.

Benefits of Automation process is fast comparison to manual, we can regression anytime at the time of new feature launch. drawbacks- it's bit costlier comparison to manual and we can't do everything automate.

First, Android has Espresso for running UI tests and iOS has XCTest. However, other options are available, too. Second, Automated testing requires coding the testing paths, and sometimes that can be difficult to setup and code for given the technology choices that have been made. That being said, automated tests usually run much faster than manual tests and because of this, can be ran on every commit, push, and build. My general recommendation is that the dev team should maintain their automated tests themselves, but they should be based on manual QA tests or consult with their QA team members when building these tests (we all have QA team members, right?).

Benefits of Automated Testing: Automated testing accelerates the testing process, ensuring faster feedback on code changes. It excels in repetitive tasks, covering extensive test scenarios efficiently. It enhances accuracy, reducing the likelihood of human errors, and allows for frequent regression testing, ensuring stability with continuous integration. Drawbacks of Automated Testing: Despite its efficiency, automated testing requires initial setup time and ongoing maintenance. It may struggle with complex, dynamically changing interfaces. Automated tests might not capture the entire user experience, missing certain nuances. Also, creating and maintaining automated scripts can be expensive.

Automated testing offers high efficiency and can execute repetitive tasks quickly, providing consistent results and comprehensive coverage. It's ideal for regression, load, and performance testing. However, it requires upfront investment in tools and skills development. Automated tests can be less flexible in adapting to new or

Check for the following: (1). Is it really adding value, or can it be managed by native-level testing frameworks offered by Apple & Google? (2). Depends on the context of the app. What kind of testing services are you looking for: scalable automation, or do you need a greater number of devices for coverage, which requires a device farm? Or do you need more execution time, which involves stress testing, performance testing, etc.?

In my experience, a critical aspect is ensuring that all obscure scenarios are addressed in the automation process. How do you ensure that all hidden scenarios are thoroughly tested when automating mobile app testing?

It's like picking a partner for a dance - they must move in sync with your needs. Before hiring, ask key questions: What's their expertise in your app's platform? How do they handle various testing scenarios, including stress and performance tests? For my first app, asking about their previous projects and client feedback was enlightening. Ensure they align with your business goals and app functionality. It’s not just about testing; it’s about ensuring your app’s quality and reliability.

This is a great point, some external manual testers are eager to show their value and create a lot of superficial bugs. Depending on the stage of your app development and maturity they may be just going into bug black hole. So triage bugs and communicate with vendors what kind of issues are important for you

In my experience, a critical aspect is ensuring that all obscure scenarios are addressed in the automation process. How do you ensure that all hidden scenarios are thoroughly tested when automating mobile app testing?

Another important factor when choosing a service is how well it works/integrates with your existing processes and team. The choice might vary depending on the team size, release velocity, and the definition of a golden workflow for the app.

How to Choose the Best Mobile App Testing Service for Your Business: Assess your specific testing needs and match them with the service’s expertise. Consider the service’s experience with similar apps or industries. Evaluate their testing tools and technologies. Look for services that offer clear communication and detailed reporting. Compare pricing but also consider the value for money in terms of quality and reliability.

Choosing the best mobile app testing service for your business depends on your app's specific needs and goals. You should compare different service providers based on their reputation, portfolio, testimonials, and pricing. You should also request a free trial or a sample report to evaluate their quality and suitability. Ideally, you should look for a mobile app testing service that offers a combination of manual and automated testing, as well as a customized and flexible testing plan that meets your expectations and standards.

Importante olhar para pontos que ir?o nortear a decis?o, além de servirem como term?metros no dia a dia. confiabilidade e cobertura nos testes, maturidade do time no uso da ferramenta, compartilhamento de conhecimento, e a cultura. Precisamos garantir que n?o seja uma decis?o parcial ou momentanea, além de gerar resultados claros pras lideran?as que consiga-se relacionar ao valor pro negócio.

My advice is to find a company that is willing to do predominantly manual testing and automate a few key flows. Ask your dev team to review the automation code and follow that team’s lead as the dev team maintains those tests (and generates new ones) going forward. Manual testing is usually faster if only ran once, so you should (in theory) get more for your dollar by paying for manual testing and manual test cases make great starting points for automation, too.

In my experience, an important aspect to consider in mobile app testing is how the application responds to different ranges of internet/cell data connectivity. Too often I have seen the focus lean away from this, only for the app to be released to production and have data transfer issues based on connectivity. Make sure your testing team has access to traffic proxy tools, like Charles Proxy for example, to ensure that the application will be tested at different levels and ranges of internet and wireless connectivity. Common bugs happen in big cities, where structures can often cause issues with connecting to cell data, or in buildings where cell connectivity is reduced or blocked.

De acuerdo a mi experiencia, el éxito se basa en un mix de las 2 alternativas. Las pruebas manuales ayudan mucho a identificar problemas y mejoras a nivel de UI/UX y sirven para detectar cosas que un sistema automático no podría detectar, por ejemplo una falla ortográfica. Estas pruebas deben ser realizadas siempre tanto por personas del equipo como por terceros que no estén sesgados por el día a a día del proyecto. Por otro lado, más que herramientas de pruebas automáticas, recomiendo el uso de herramientas de análisis mas comoletas, que permiten el acceso a datos y estadísticas que no sólo ayudan a detectar errores sino también a entender el uso que los clientes finales le dan al app, a través de Heat Maps o Flow Maps.

Getting the mobile app testing done is quite a challenge as the users cant test them on multiple device. Specially there is huge difference in UX on iOS and android devices so getting these issues cater within a single test is quite a task.

In addition to the main factors, consider the testing service's scalability to support your app's growth, their use of the latest technologies and methodologies, data security practices, and their ability to integrate with your existing tools and workflows. Transparency in reporting and communication is crucial for timely decision-making. Lastly, assess their track record and ask for case studies or references to ensure they have a proven history of delivering quality services.

Modern mobile app testing services encompass a wide array of methodologies and tools designed to ensure that applications perform efficiently and reliably across various devices and operating systems.