You're juggling conflicting user needs in product design. How do you decide which features to prioritize?
When user needs clash in product design, decisive action is needed. To navigate this challenge:
Which strategies do you find most effective when balancing different user needs?
You're juggling conflicting user needs in product design. How do you decide which features to prioritize?
When user needs clash in product design, decisive action is needed. To navigate this challenge:
Which strategies do you find most effective when balancing different user needs?
-
When prioritizing product features, combine data on user impact with strategic thinking. Look at how many users are affected and how severely, but also consider whether they're key users and if the feature aligns with business goals. Sometimes a quick helpful fix is better than a complex solution, so focus on delivering real value efficiently while staying flexible enough to adapt to changing needs.
-
I tend to consider and review a few aspects including: * how many conflicting needs are there (are there just 2, or are there more) * does one have a significantly larger audience vs the other, and .. * how does each align with your current plans, future plans (one solution may align better now, but may not be the best route long term) * gut feel (Dyson famously went against what market research and design teams were telling him as he was sure the clear cylinder was the right approach; time has shown he was right) * is there an new approach which better addresses the needs/problem? Often conflicting views present an opportunity to innovate so users *can* have their cake and eat it :-)
-
I tend to consider and review a few aspects including: * how many conflicting needs are there (are there just 2, or are there more) * does one have a significantly larger audience vs the other, and .. * how does each align with your current plans, future plans (one solution may align better now, but may not be the best route long term) * gut feel (Dyson famously went against what market research and design teams were telling him as he was sure the clear cylinder was the right approach; time has shown he was right) * is there an new approach which better addresses the needs/problem? Often conflicting views present an opportunity to innovate so users *can* have their cake and eat it :-)