You're facing a system design dilemma. How do you juggle quick fixes and sustainable solutions?

1. Understand the root-cause 2. Determine and evaluate the impacts 3. Prioritize accordingly 4. Conduct first-aid of the problems 5. Apply the sustainable solutions 6. Iterative approach and monitor the progress

Trouble shooting in real time require different avenues 1 proactive or reactive meaning soft ware / hardware you pick So when troubleshooting mechanical or electrical devices they all have a difference 3 phase devises are different from mechanical but do have the same references when it comes to process

Quick fixes are good for production issues as it let buisness help their clients for product availability and reliability. But, It should be placed with an aggrement of sustainable solutions or root cause fixed in earliest planned release or hot fixes. If the sustainable solution is not in aggrement for planned delivery then these conflicts can cause tech debt growing is system and may be some day impact product & business with heavy cost.

Embracing quick fixes demands a strategic mindset: use them sparingly, like a skilled surgeon applying a tourniquet, while always keeping an eye on sustainable solutions. It’s not just about putting out fires—it’s about building a fireproof foundation. For instance, a cloud service facing rapid user growth might temporarily increase server capacity to handle performance bottlenecks. While this offers immediate relief, re-architecting the application for auto-scaling and load balancing provides a long-term solution. Balancing these approaches manages scalability without accumulating technical debt.

Sustainable solutions demand a revolutionary mindset that transcends traditional improvements and embraces transformative changes. Rather than tweaking existing systems, envision a complete paradigm shift by leveraging cutting-edge technologies like blockchain for data integrity or quantum computing for processing power. This approach requires reimagining the entire ecosystem, radically prioritizing long-term resilience and adaptability. By disrupting the cycle of patchwork fixes and technical debt, you set the stage for unprecedented innovation. This isn't just about future-proofing—it's about future-making, aligning technological advancements with visionary business goals to revolutionize the system.

The best systems are always playing "3D chess". Your solution should for sure address the immediate need, but your eye should also be on that larger holistic vision which will lead to improved efficiency, cost saving, and customer satisfaction in the future.

The correct balancing act requires a good understanding of your current business environment. Going for the sustainable solution when the company is sputtering will not lead to you staying in business long enough to reap the rewards, while going for the quick-fix adds technical debt (which is not always bad, but what you gain from taking on the debt must exceed the debt you take). This question almost always comes down to a political/business/management decision -- are you a company that likes to take on debt for the chance to grow or move quickly, or one that prefers to build a solid foundation?

In most cases, it is definitely a balancing act ! A quick fix may be unavoidable and almost necessary to meet market needs such as meeting feature delivery timelines (or) product launch dates etc , A robust sustainable solution may be more important for the overall good of the IT stack (not necessarily market driven always). That said a sustainable, pluggable and configurable solution that is both robust and usable is what everyone aspires for ! It is the ideal state ! Reality more often than not requires a balance between ideal vs practical leading us into tactical solutions to satisfy multiple stakeholders eventually by striking a balance on various priorities !

To navigate this dilemma, adopt a holistic decision-making framework that goes beyond immediate issue severity or user impact. Include criteria like ecosystem synergy, innovation potential, and ethical considerations. For example, in solutions architecture, instead of just patching a database performance issue, consider how implementing a new microservices architecture could revolutionize scalability and resilience. Evaluate technical debt from quick fixes but also the creative opportunities they might unlock. This approach ensures decisions balance urgent needs with transformative, long-term benefits, driving both immediate resolution and pioneering progress.

To develop the decision framework further, introduce economics. What economic value will the quick fix deliver? Balance that against the implementation cost of the quick fix and the remedial cost to deal with technical debt. Understanding the economics of product development unlocks faster, better decision making.

When faced with a problem, it’s tempting to opt for the quickest solution, but this isn’t always the best choice. To make an informed decision, use a decision-making framework to weigh the urgency of the issue against its long-term impact. Consider how quickly a solution is needed, how many users it will affect, whether it aligns with overall goals, and if it might lead to more problems in the future. By thoughtfully evaluating these factors, a balance can be struck between addressing immediate needs and establishing a solid foundation for the future.

Management is about balancing risks and rewards. Managers can only make informed decisions when they are informed. Your choice of communication method (email, in-person, text, chats, jira, meetings, etc.) will depend on your specific management, and the content (technical information, business information, charts, analysis, table, summaries, risks/rewards) will depend on the level of the management (technical manager through to President/COO). If your management does not understand the issues, you need to adjust your presentation tools and style to get through -- poor communication is likely to lead to someone missing out on advancement or even being let go, and it probably won't be your manager!

Version control is crucial here. We use Git to manage our codebase. For quick fixes, we create separate branches. This keeps our main branch stable while we address urgent issues. Also, we log every quick fix, ensuring we don't forget to revisit and implement more robust solutions later. Documentation plays a key role. We thoroughly comment our hasty fixes, providing context for future developers who might encounter this code. Automated testing remains important, even for quick solutions. We write tests for our rapid fixes, maintaining system integrity. The goal isn't to choose between speed and sustainability, but to balance both.

La gestión eficaz del código es una habilidad esencial para cualquier desarrollador. Git ofrece un conjunto de herramientas poderosas para gestionar el código de forma eficiente y colaborativa. Al seguir estas prácticas y explorar las diferentes opciones que ofrece Git, puede mejorar significativamente el flujo de trabajo y la calidad de el código.

Corrección de un bug: Mientras trabajas en la sección de comentarios, descubres un error en la visualización de las imágenes. Creas una nueva rama desde la rama feature/comentarios para aislar la corrección: Bash git checkout -b bugfix/corregir-imagenes Corriges el error y realizas un commit: Bash git commit -m "Corregir visualización de imágenes"