You're facing stakeholder underestimation in test automation. How will you ensure effective QA processes?

To address stakeholder underestimation in test automation, educate them on its benefits through demos, reports, and ROI metrics. Show how automation reduces time-to-market, improves quality, and aligns with business goals. Start small with a pilot project to deliver quick wins. Highlight that automation complements manual testing and isn't a replacement. Build a scalable, easy-to-maintain framework that supports CI/CD. Engage stakeholders with regular updates and metrics, while minimizing test flakiness. Emphasize cost efficiency and long-term ROI to address concerns about upfront investment. Ensure collaboration with development teams for shared responsibility.

To handle stakeholder underestimation in test automation, I would highlight the long-term benefits, such as time savings and increased efficiency. I’d showcase quick wins with small automation projects and ensure a balanced approach between manual and automated testing. Engaging stakeholders in setting realistic expectations is key to aligning on coverage and timelines.

Para enfrentar a subestima??o das partes interessadas na automa??o de testes, é crucial educá-las sobre os benefícios dessa prática. Isso envolve comunicar de forma clara e eficaz como a automa??o de testes pode executar tarefas repetitivas com precis?o, liberando os testadores humanos para focarem em cenários mais complexos que exigem julgamento e análise detalhada. Ao destacar que a automa??o pode acelerar a detec??o de defeitos, reduzir o tempo de lan?amento no mercado e elevar a qualidade geral do produto, você ajuda a alinhar as expectativas das partes interessadas.

One thinkin I strongly agree stakeholders wants product on time but they don't know there is some process QA automation is one that which reduce human effort and error free products Because if they know about the outcomes they will strongly giving them examples with real time is best way too convincing.

Stakeholder underestimation in test automation can be a real headache. But hey, it's an opportunity to shine! To ensure effective QA processes, it's all about communication and proving value. Start by showcasing the ROI of automation. It's about saving time, money, and headaches in the long run. Use real-world examples to demonstrate how automation has prevented bugs and improved product quality. Make sure to involve stakeholders in the process, setting realistic expectations and celebrating wins together.

On this my point of view would be - just set up a basic automation testing framework and automate a few high priority scenarios without letting your stakeholders know and present it to them. Now, you can show them a clear picture of how the extension of automation will help them achieve a faster release cycle with lesser number of manpower and it would ultimately relieve pressure from the QAs as well. Performing the sanity and regression takes more time for every release and this hassle might deviate QAs from finding the edge cases and corner cases. So adding automation might help release a good quality product.

Automation many times can be expensive and can take more time in design and implementation that the manual or semi automatic testing, this are some reasons why the full automation is not the first approach, however a full automation can be a time saver, in the past I participated in the creation and implementation of a results analyzer (automated) to create a complete framework. This framework should get the test results to analyze and process the issues excluding the false positives and finally auto reporting, the intention of this framework is working with a few engineers to give a framework maintenance and analysis of inconclusive results, feeding and training the framework with a new data. This is hard to get and is not for all tests.

Alinhar os objetivos das partes interessadas com os benefícios da automa??o de testes é fundamental para transformar o ceticismo em apoio. Primeiro, identifique quais s?o suas principais metas, como redu??o de custos, aumento da qualidade do produto ou acelera??o dos ciclos de lan?amento. Em seguida, demonstre claramente como a automa??o de testes contribui para esses resultados. Por exemplo, destaque como a automa??o pode economizar custos ao reduzir a dependência de testes manuais, além de garantir uma cobertura de teste consistente e abrangente, resultando em um produto de maior qualidade e menos vulnerável a erros.

This is the one time cost and in future alot of benefits comes jn because less human effort and accurate results.For example hiring the senoir resource and setting up frame work is helps to reduce manual testing efforts

Mostrar o retorno sobre o investimento (ROI) é essencial para convencer as partes interessadas do valor da automa??o de testes. Demonstre como os custos iniciais s?o rapidamente compensados por benefícios de longo prazo, como a diminui??o do esfor?o manual e a redu??o das taxas de erro. Apresente casos concretos onde a automa??o reduziu significativamente o tempo necessário para testes de regress?o ou permitiu testes mais frequentes e detalhados no mesmo intervalo de tempo, resultando em um produto mais estável e confiável. Ao evidenciar esses ganhos tangíveis e mensuráveis, você fortalece o argumento de que a automa??o n?o é apenas um custo, mas um investimento estratégico que impulsiona a qualidade e a eficiência.

To receive funds for your automation project, create a list of areas where improvements can be made: E.g.: 1. Current number of man hours spent in a test cycle 2. Distribution of bugs over a period of the product test cycle (see how you can change this to speed up bug fixes) 3. Time taken by developers to debug or reproduce. Then, estimate how much automation can improve in all those areas in terms of time, efficiency, and costs; also, project how initial investment will save costs over time.

Implementar a automa??o de testes de forma gradual é uma estratégia eficaz para conquistar a confian?a das partes interessadas. Comece com a automa??o de um pequeno conjunto de testes que s?o demorados ou suscetíveis a erros humanos. à medida que esses testes demonstram seu valor, proporcionando feedback consistente e ágil, as partes interessadas poder?o observar os benefícios tangíveis da automa??o. Essa abordagem incremental permite que a equipe fa?a ajustes conforme necessário e aprenda com a experiência, criando uma base sólida para expandir os esfor?os de automa??o de maneira mais ampla à medida que a confian?a no processo aumenta.

Yes if start with small chunks and giving them demos is more reliable to way to which defines the overall automation more efficiently

Monitorar o progresso é crucial para o sucesso da automa??o de testes. Estabele?a indicadores-chave de desempenho (KPIs) claros, como a taxa de detec??o de defeitos e a porcentagem de cobertura de teste, para avaliar a eficácia dos testes automatizados. Realize revis?es regulares dessas métricas com as partes interessadas, demonstrando os avan?os alcan?ados e ajustando a estratégia conforme necessário. Essa abordagem transparente n?o apenas evidencia o valor da automa??o, mas também fortalece a confian?a das partes interessadas no processo, mostrando que os objetivos compartilhados est?o sendo atingidos de forma eficaz.