Navigating solar integration conflicts requires diplomacy, technical expertise, and focusing on shared goals. First, understand why opinions differ (technical, financial, aesthetic concerns). Facilitate open dialogue, actively listening to all stakeholders. Reiterate overarching project objectives to align priorities. Base decisions on data, including expert input for objectivity. Find common ground, building towards compromise and collaboration. Document decisions for transparency.

A combination of Agile, Waterfall and Lean management will take the team a long way. For rigid requirements such as deadlines a Waterfall approach should be followed here ownership (subject matter people) and delivery of tasks need to be followed on time and on budget. There is the case where feedback from the customer is ongoing during installation and construction (needs innovation and novel solutions ）or during operation (new requirement)in this flexibility is necessary based on iteration and most experienced. Finally, the lean approach to minimize waste wherever it may happen (performance, money, energy). If they agree on dividing the operation in this manner they can push through and no conflict should arise.

Aligning stakeholders on solar energy integration requires a strategic, data-driven approach. Start by identifying key concerns—costs (investors), reliability (operations), regulations (government), and savings (end users). Leverage case studies, cost-benefit analyses, and available incentives to demonstrate ROI. Address risks through PPAs, hybrid models, or BIPV solutions. Engage experts for technical, financial, and regulatory insights. Implement a phased roadmap: feasibility (2 months), pilot (6 months), and full rollout (12-18 months). Maintain transparency through regular updates, dashboards, and clear issue resolution. By focusing on shared benefits and proactive solutions, you can drive alignment and ensure successful implementation.

Pour garder une discussion saine, il est important que chaque participant.e puisse s'exprimer librement. Lorsqu'on est confronté à des opinions contraires, une posture à adopter peut être d'amener les parties à focaliser leur attention sur la pertinence des solutions. Par exemple orienter le débat autour d'une étude approfondie : de faisabilité, économique, environnementale, ... Puis amener les parties prenantes à baser leur réflexion sur les faits.

Listen to each stakeholder’s concerns and find common ground. Present data on solar energy benefits, including cost savings and efficiency. Highlight successful case studies to build confidence. Facilitate open discussions to address doubts and align goals. Focus on shared interests to drive a collaborative solution.