Navigating conflicting feedback on VR performance can be challenging but rewarding. Start by categorizing the feedback into themes—such as graphics, user experience, and technical issues—to identify common concerns. Engage with both sides by asking clarifying questions to understand their perspectives better. Use this insight to prioritize improvements that address the most significant pain points while maintaining an open dialogue with your team and users.

If the feedback is specifically about performance, you should analyze it with "Profiler" if you are using Unity You can use it to measure render time, CPU and GPU utilization, frame rate, memory consumption, and other metrics Also run stress tests and create load tests by placing a large number of objects, complex shaders, lighting and post-processing effects in a scene

The Most Important Things In VR is that it should run seamless.. The feedback can be categorized into internal and external factors… Internal feedbacks are those given by your peers, developers, testers and external are given by customers….. It’s always advisable to fix the internal feedbacks as your team is much more experienced in creating VR solutions, If you fix the internal feedbacks, I am sure you will have less external feedbacks… Sometimes there also a trade off b/w performance over feature or vice versa.. Discuss the possible solutions for all the feedbacks and then decide how those can be implemented in context of project needs

Navigating conflicting feedback on VR performance involves several steps. First, gather all the feedback and categorize it by themes or common issues. Then, engage directly with the stakeholders to clarify their perspectives and understand the reasoning behind their comments. Prioritize the feedback based on impact and feasibility, focusing on what aligns with your project goals.

To navigate conflicting feedback on VR performance, I categorize input by source, prioritize based on project goals, and quantify issues for objective assessment. Engaging stakeholders ensures alignment, while iterative prototyping tests solutions effectively. By transparently communicating trade-offs and focusing on user experience, I balance diverse perspectives to deliver a well-rounded, goal-driven outcome.