You're faced with automating test cases. How can you prioritize them without sacrificing quality?

By implementing the concepts of risk based testing, one should be able to prioritize what needs to be tested first in the order of priority. It is important to find the critical areas of the application, the test cases that are most vulnerable and the ones which are at the highest risk We all talk about "Quality First" approach and only with Risk Based Testing (RBT), this can be achieved

1.Prioritize test cases that have a significant impact on user experience and business operations. 2.Select test cases that cover features or functionalities that are used most often. 3.Perform regression testing for core functionalities 4.Choose test cases which helps in maintaining automation reliability

To prioritize automating test cases without sacrificing quality: 1. Focus on critical functionalities that impact user experience and business operations. 2. Prioritize test cases that cover frequently used features. 3. Automate repetitive and time-consuming tasks to save time and resources. 4. Ensure core functionalities are covered by automated regression tests. 5. Select stable test cases less likely to change frequently. 6. Evaluate the return on investment for automating each test case. 7. Use insights from manual testing to identify high-value automation candidates.

Risk Assessment involves identifying and evaluating potential problems that could affect a project or system. It means analyzing what could go wrong, how likely it is to happen, and what impact it might have. By assessing risks, you can prioritize which issues need attention, plan for potential problems, and take steps to minimize or manage their impact. This helps ensure that you can address challenges effectively and keep projects on track.

While assessing risk for automation we combine both functionality risk and business value. e.g if the functionality of checkout page for ecomm is at high risk because of multiple API calls and it also has high business value then we will pick up that scenario first for Automation.

Automatización de Pruebas de Software Basada en el Valor del Negocio es el uso de herramientas y técnicas para realizar pruebas automáticamente, con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad del software mientras se alinea con los objetivos estratégicos de la empresa Alineación Estratégica: Enfocar la automatización en pruebas que apoyen los objetivos clave de negocio, como acelerar el tiempo de comercialización y mejorar la calidad Selección de Pruebas: Priorizar la automatización de pruebas repetitivas y complejas que tienen un alto impacto en la calidad del software Medición del Valor: Evaluar el impacto de la automatización mediante métricas como reducción de tiempos de prueba

Bedenke auch die 80/20-Regel in beide Richtungen. Teste automatisiert nur, was Du ohne zus?tzliche Komplexit?t automatisieren kannst: Verlust der Single Source of Truth, Hoher Implementierungsaufwand.

Here, you can also conside; ? Usage Analytics: Use data analytics to identify the most frequently used features of your application. Automate test cases for these features first to ensure they are always functioning correctly. ? User Scenarios: Focus on common user scenarios and workflows. Ensuring these are robust can prevent major disruptions for the majority of users.

It's better to go too wide, before going too deep. It's natural for developers to want to squeeze out every line of code coverage as possible. But after 70-80% coverage you really start to see declining business value to additional coverage.

Considering the following; ? Stable Features: Focus on automating test cases for features that are stable and not undergoing frequent changes. This reduces the maintenance overhead and ensures reliability. ? Avoiding Volatile Areas: Postpone automating test cases for parts of the application that are still in active development or subject to frequent modifications.

El nivel? más avanzado son las pruebas end-to-end, las que simulan la experiencia de usuario paso a paso y verifican que el software funciona de principio a fin. Son las que más valor aportan, ya que garantizan que la aplicación funciona correctamente pero tambien son las más costosas de realizar, y se suelen dejar para el final y casos muy?concretos. Es decir,? hacer los test justos para validar que damos el servicio principal y el resto de funcionalidades probarlas desde las capas más bajas donde podemos identificar el punto exacto del error y? llegar a todas las casuísticas. Este nivel de pruebas es costoso de realizar, frágil, tarda en ejecutarse y requiere mucho mantenimiento.

Identify Stable Test Cases Focus On: Test cases that are consistent and reliable across different runs and environments. Why It Helps: Reduces maintenance efforts and minimizes false positives and negatives in test results. I believe that focusing on stable test cases, assessing historical stability, simplifying complexity, prioritizing quality, maintaining tests regularly, and using reliable frameworks helps ensure stable and effective test automation.

Prioritize features that have a low likelihood of modification in the near future, ensuring that automated tests remain valid and require minimal updates. Focus on Stable Interfaces, like automated tests for APIs that are stable and have consistent behavior over time. Work with product managers and stakeholders to identify features with stable and well-defined requirements.

-Make test case as simple as possible, avoid any steps that doesn’t need to be covered as part of test case or anything that is covered already in some other test case -Try not to make test case too complicated and test lot of things in same test as this might make test cases unstable even if one feature is failed -Where possible add rules to continue test on failure if needed to reach final step to avoid flakiness when test is dependent on unstable features -Use modern tools with capabilities to self heal might also be a good option -Making small reusable stable components will also help

Actually, I disagree that the counterpoint to "test complexity" is "frequency". All tests that are worth doing, are worth doing often regardless of simplicity. But you can run a higher *volume* of simple tests: A unit test of a single function is fast and simple, so it's easy to test every possible combination of arguments and behaviors. A complex test that takes an hour, however, can only be run with one or two versions at a time. That's why simple tests and complex tests must work together to "explore the whole space" of behavior. The issue that determines *frequency* is available resources. A test that takes hours to complete can still be run daily, but if the test strains your resources, then you might have to stick to weekend runs.

Begin with API automation to cover critical backend functionalities, Then UI automation to cover end-to-end scenarios and to validate the user interface and user experience.

Imprescindible los test?unitarios por cada tarea de un desarrollo,? es decir, se empieza a probar durante el desarrollo y se debe estimar y formar parte de los tiempos de este desarrollo estas pruebas. ?Cuánto tiempo dedico a las pruebas unitarias?.? Pues todo lo que puedas porque son los test más rápidos de ejecutar, menos costosos de desarrollar, más fáciles de mantener y muy robustos. Hay que procurar que estos test cubran la mayor parte de la aplicación y siempre realizarlos, no es optativo. Hecha la parte unitaria,?plantearse el siguiente nivel de pruebas: "test de contratos" y/o las pruebas de integración para comprobar que cada uno de los componentes se integra/comunica de manera correcta con elementos dependientes del sistema.

To prioritize automation test cases without sacrificing quality: 1. Risk-Based: Focus on high-risk areas, complex features, and areas with a history of defects. 2. Value: Prioritize core functionalities, high-impact customer features, and business-critical requirements. 3. Usage Frequency: Test critical paths and ensure key regression coverage. 4. Stability: Run stable and recently updated tests first. 5. Time Efficiency: Execute quick tests early and leverage parallel execution. 6. Maintainability: Prioritize reusable, maintainable tests and address coverage gaps. 7. Continuous Feedback: Integrate tests with CI/CD for immediate feedback. 8. Stakeholder Input: Collaborate with developers, QA, and users to identify priority areas.

Normally before we start automating, we create automation strategy. One of the major points leading to automation is quick turnaround along with ROI without compromising the testing quality.So in a suite of test cases I personally vouch for targeting those test case for automation as a priority which are business critical along with taking lot of manual effort.

? Automating the tests for high-risk areas first ? Automating tests that validate core functionalities which are directly linked to customer satisfaction ? Automating test cases that are stable and unlikely to change frequently ? Automating simple but repetitive tests ? Automating test cases that are time-consuming, require extensive data setup, have multiple steps, or need to be run on various configurations and platforms

Whenever automating features, it’s crucial to evaluate the Return on Investment (ROI) of each test case. Assess Criticality:Features that are central to business operations or user experience should be automated first. Evaluate Stability: Automate tests for stable areas where changes are infrequent. Categorize Tests: Organize test cases into categories such as unit tests, integration tests, and UI tests. Consider Usage Frequency: Prioritize automation of tests for features that are frequently used. Review Historical Data: Use historical defect data to prioritize test cases in these areas to prevent recurring problems. Balance Coverage: Ensure a balanced approach by covering functional, regression, performance, and security aspects.

Usually, we develop an automation strategy before we begin automating. A key factor in automation is achieving ROI quickly without sacrificing the caliber of the testing. Therefore, I personally attest to the fact that among a suite of test cases, I personally recommend prioritizing the automation of those that are both highly manual and crucial to the operation of the business.

To prioritize test cases for automation without sacrificing quality: Focus on High-Value Tests: Automate tests for critical business functions and high-risk areas prone to defects. Reusability: Prioritize tests that can be reused across modules or cycles. Frequency: Automate smoke and regression tests that run frequently. Stability: Choose stable features unlikely to change. Complexity & Time: Automate complex, time-consuming, or data-driven tests. Core Flows: Cover critical user paths. Feasibility: Evaluate technical ease and ROI. Independence: Automate standalone tests. History: Prioritize tests that detect critical defects. Stakeholder Input: Consider feedback on critical areas.

The most important aspect of including tests in your Continuous Integration pipeline is enabling contributions from outside your team. When the owners of an application don't have the time to enhance it, another team might step in and contribute to the app. But they can only do so safely if there's a thorough set of merge-blocking test cases that ensure new changes don't cause a regression in unrelated features. Once in place, however, CI tests also benefit anyone who isn't perfectly familiar with the code in question, which can include recent hires, junior developers, or even senior developers who haven't worked on it for a long time.

Incorporar testes automatizados em uma integra??o contínua (CI) é fundamental para uma automa??o eficaz. Escolho testes que possam ser acionados automaticamente com cada altera??o de código, garantindo feedback imediato sobre a integridade do aplicativo. Foco em testes de funcionalidades críticas que possam ser executados rapidamente para manter um ritmo de desenvolvimento ágil. A integra??o com CI ajuda a identificar defeitos precocemente, reduz o ciclo de feedback e assegura um nível constante de qualidade ao longo do desenvolvimento.

Pay Attention to High-Value Tests: Automate testing of crucial business processes and high-risk, defect-prone regions. Reusability: Give tests that can be applied to different modules or cycles priority. Automate regression and smoke tests that occur on a regular basis. Stability: Select aspects that are stable and unlikely to change. Complexity & Time: Automate tests that are data-driven, complex, or require a lot of time. Core Flows: Address essential user journeys. Feasibility: Assess ROI and technological simplicity. Independence: Make independent tests automatic. History: Give tests that identify important flaws top priority. Stakeholder input: Take into account opinions on important topics.