You're dealing with stakeholders downplaying regression testing. How can you emphasize its critical role?
When stakeholders underestimate regression testing, demonstrate its value clearly. Here's how:
How have you convinced others of the significance of regression testing?
You're dealing with stakeholders downplaying regression testing. How can you emphasize its critical role?
When stakeholders underestimate regression testing, demonstrate its value clearly. Here's how:
How have you convinced others of the significance of regression testing?
-
You can't make a stakeholder care about testing. You can make them aware of risk. I'd outline the risks that we are exposed to by not running rhd regression. They still say no? I'd now ask them to sign off the tests not being run. Risks on them not QA, when you do that people day "just run them". Ownership of risk is key.
-
I can understand the feeling that regression testing doesn’t seem thrilling. But imagine you’re composing a symphony and decide to add a few new instruments. Without checking how they blend with the existing ones, you might end up with a beautiful solo and a complete disaster when the full orchestra plays. Skipping it is like hitting play and crossing your fingers.
-
If we properly communicate the value of regression testing to stakeholders and provide real-world examples, it can prevent costly bugs and save time in the development process. Implementing regression testing helps catch bugs in the early phases of every new feature or change in the system, which affects both time and cost. Even if we are busy, it’s important not to miss the opportunity to raise awareness about the significance of testing with stakeholders
-
To help stakeholders see the value of regression testing, explain that it’s essential for making sure new changes don’t accidentally break existing features. Share examples or past cases where skipping these tests led to serious issues or user complaints, showing how it protects the product’s quality and keeps users happy. Highlight that regression testing actually saves time and money in the long run by catching issues early, preventing costly rework later. You can also suggest using automated tests to keep the process quick and efficient, framing it as a smart investment rather than extra work.
-
If regression testing seems “optional,” here’s why it’s vital: 1. Real-world examples show how bugs introduced by small updates, left untested, have caused costly issues impacting user trust. Regression testing catches these early. 2. The benefits are quantifiable too—data shows that finding bugs early can save 3-5x compared to fixing post-release, saves time and budget. 3. Continuous education is key. Through workshops, I aim to show stakeholders the long-term gains of thorough testing. “It worked last time” isn’t a guarantee—consistent testing protects quality and growth.
更多相关阅读内容
-
Test StrategyHow do you deal with conflicting or ambiguous test entry and exit criteria for different test levels?
-
Agile TestingHow do you handle complex or uncertain scenarios with specification by example tests?
-
Quality AssuranceWhat's the best way to create a comprehensive test plan for all requirements and scenarios?
-
Code ReviewWhat are some common unit testing pitfalls or anti-patterns to avoid?