Your team member keeps brushing off code review feedback. How do you tactfully address this recurring issue?
When a team member repeatedly brushes off code review comments, it's crucial to approach the issue constructively. To ensure your feedback is heard and implemented:
- Discuss the importance of code reviews for quality assurance and team learning during your next team meeting.
- Set clear expectations for how feedback should be addressed and establish a follow-up process.
- Offer one-on-one mentorship or pair programming sessions to help them understand and apply the suggestions.
How have you successfully handled such situations in your team?
Your team member keeps brushing off code review feedback. How do you tactfully address this recurring issue?
When a team member repeatedly brushes off code review comments, it's crucial to approach the issue constructively. To ensure your feedback is heard and implemented:
- Discuss the importance of code reviews for quality assurance and team learning during your next team meeting.
- Set clear expectations for how feedback should be addressed and establish a follow-up process.
- Offer one-on-one mentorship or pair programming sessions to help them understand and apply the suggestions.
How have you successfully handled such situations in your team?
-
To tactfully address a team member consistently brushing off code review feedback, start by having a private, respectful conversation. Emphasize the importance of code reviews as a learning and quality improvement tool, not a critique of their skills. Explain how feedback helps maintain code consistency, prevent bugs, and ensure team collaboration. Encourage them to view it as a growth opportunity and a chance to improve the project’s overall success. Ask if there are any barriers to implementing the feedback and offer support. Reinforce a culture of openness and learning, where everyone benefits from shared insights.
-
When a team member disregards code review feedback, I start by emphasizing the value of code reviews during a team meeting—highlighting their role in quality assurance and knowledge sharing. Setting clear expectations for how feedback should be addressed is key, along with a follow-up process to ensure changes are made. Offering one-on-one mentorship or pairing sessions also helps the team member better understand the feedback.
-
I'd start by trying to understand the underlying reasoning behind it. Often, the feedback may be deprioritized and not disregarded, due to a lack of time [urgent deadlines] or relevance. What worked well for me is, if the feedback is disregarded I create a tracking item [eg. JIRA ticket] for said changes & assign it to the person with a deadline, making sure that the changes get picked up them or someone else in the team. This makes sure that the overall code quality is not going down. As to the person involved, I would first try to fix it myself and see if it could be done in due time and quality. If yes, I would address this in a 1:1 with the above example of how to do it.
-
Escalate. It's not your job to ensure that feedback is incorporated, it's theirs. If they're not doing that, their management needs to know. We often fear escalation because we treat it as about winning. It's not, it's about clarity. If you think your feedback has value, and the other person doesn't, you might talk to them, but the reason you have a code review process is that management expects it'll result in better code, and it's not.
-
Fire people who don't cooperate with their colleagues. Code is created together, not alone. People who do not listen to others always cause harm to the company and their colleagues.
更多相关阅读内容
-
ProgrammingHow can you pair program with someone who has a different skill level?
-
ProgrammingYou’ve received feedback from your peers. What’s the best way to respond?
-
Agile MethodologiesHow do you pair program with different skill levels and backgrounds?
-
Extreme ProgrammingHow do you adapt and learn from failures and mistakes in extreme programming?